Elan J Golan1, Robert Tisherman1,2, Kevin Byrne1, Theresa Diermeier1,3, Ravi Vaswani1, Volker Musahl4,5. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Building, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. 2. Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Building, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. musahlv@upmc.edu. 5. Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. musahlv@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the setting of rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a resurgence of interest in knee's anterolateral complex (ALC). Reconstruction or augmentation of the ALC with procedures such as a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been proposed to reduce rotatory knee instability in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The current review investigates the recent literature surrounding the role of the ALC in preventing rotatory knee instability. RECENT FINDINGS: The knee's anterolateral complex (ALC) is a complex structure composed of the superficial and deep portions of the iliotibial band, the capsulo-osseous layer, and the anterolateral capsule. Distally, these various layers merge to form a single functional unit which imparts stability to the lateral knee. While the iliotibial band and the capsule-osseous layer have been shown to be primary restraints to rotatory motion after ACL injury, the biomechanical role of the anterolateral capsule remains unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral capsule and the anterolateral thickening of this capsule act as a sheet of fibrous tissue which does not resist motion around the knee as other longitudinally oriented ligaments do. Augmentation of the ALC, with LET, has been performed globally for over 30 years. This procedure can decrease rotatory knee instability, but long-term studies have found little difference in patient-reported outcomes, osteoarthritis, or ACL reconstruction failure with the addition of LET. Further research is needed to clarify indications for the clinical use of ALC-based procedures.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the setting of rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a resurgence of interest in knee's anterolateral complex (ALC). Reconstruction or augmentation of the ALC with procedures such as a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been proposed to reduce rotatory knee instability in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The current review investigates the recent literature surrounding the role of the ALC in preventing rotatory knee instability. RECENT FINDINGS: The knee's anterolateral complex (ALC) is a complex structure composed of the superficial and deep portions of the iliotibial band, the capsulo-osseous layer, and the anterolateral capsule. Distally, these various layers merge to form a single functional unit which imparts stability to the lateral knee. While the iliotibial band and the capsule-osseous layer have been shown to be primary restraints to rotatory motion after ACL injury, the biomechanical role of the anterolateral capsule remains unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral capsule and the anterolateral thickening of this capsule act as a sheet of fibrous tissue which does not resist motion around the knee as other longitudinally oriented ligaments do. Augmentation of the ALC, with LET, has been performed globally for over 30 years. This procedure can decrease rotatory knee instability, but long-term studies have found little difference in patient-reported outcomes, osteoarthritis, or ACL reconstruction failure with the addition of LET. Further research is needed to clarify indications for the clinical use of ALC-based procedures.
Authors: Fernando Cury Rezende; Vinicius Ynoe de Moraes; Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco; Marcus Vinícius Luzo; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; João Carlos Belloti Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kevin M Bell; Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Sebastian Irarrazaval; Daniel Guenther; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Richard E Debski Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Christopher E Hewison; Michael N Tran; Nicole Kaniki; Alliya Remtulla; Dianne Bryant; Alan M Getgood Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Camilo Partezani Helito; Carlos do Amaral; Yuri da Cunha Nakamichi; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Renato José Mendonça Natalino; José Ricardo Pécora; Tulio Pereira Cardoso; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2016-12-22
Authors: Stefano Zaffagnini; Cecilia Signorelli; Alberto Grassi; Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Darren de Sa; David Sundemo; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl; Jon Karlsson; Andrew Sheean; Jeremy M Burnham; Jayson Lian; Clair Smith; Adam Popchak; Elmar Herbst; Thomas Pfeiffer; Paulo Araujo; Alicia Oostdyk; Daniel Guenther; Bruno Ohashi; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Federico Raggi; Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Haukur Bjoernsson; Mattias Ahlden; Neel Desai Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2018-12-18
Authors: Armin Runer; Dietmar Dammerer; Christoph Kranewitter; Johannes M Giesinger; Benjamin Henninger; Michael T Hirschmann; Michael C Liebensteiner Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 4.342