| Literature DB >> 30704127 |
Reda Ben Mrid1, Najat Bouchmaa2, Youssef Bouargalne3, Btissam Ramdan4, Khalid Karrouchi5, Imad Kabach6, Miloud El Karbane7, Abderrazak Idir8, Abdelmajid Zyad9, Mohamed Nhiri10.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the antioxidant properties of aqueous and methanol extracts of needles and berries of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus (Joo) species, various antioxidant capacity assessment tests (free radical scavenging assays (DPPH• and ABTS•+ tests), ferrous ions (Fe2+) chelating activity and reducing power assay (FRAP) were conducted. In all of the tests, the extracts exhibited strong antioxidant activity. Furthermore, in-vitro cytotoxic activity assays of the methanolic extracts showed potent cytotoxic effects against two breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7), with no cytotoxicity towards normal cells (PBMCs). Reactive oxygen species generation was presumed to be a potential reason for the observed cytotoxic effects. According to all the above, and considering its appropriate composition of mineral elements and phenolic compounds, Joo could offer a beneficial and natural source of bioactive compounds that can be either used on the preventive side as it could potentially be used in the clinic without toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. Oxycedrus; antioxidant activities; cytotoxicity; human breast cancer; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30704127 PMCID: PMC6384603 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24030502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenolic compositions and concentrations of examined Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus extracts.
| Phenolic Compounds mg/100 g dw | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous | Methanolic | Aqueous | Methanolic | |
|
| ||||
|
| 8.68 ± 0.001 | 5.0 ± 0.001 | 11.4 ± 0.004 | 8.1 ± 003 |
|
| 17.5 ± 0.001 | 21.2 ± 0.001 | ND | ND |
|
| ||||
|
| ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 3398.1 ± 0.026 | 2942.7 ± 0.017 | 128.0 ± 0.010 | ND |
|
| ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 147.7 ± 0.009 | 416.6 ± 0.006 | 5.9 ± 0.003w | 2.9 ± 0.005 |
|
| ||||
|
| 278.8 ± 0.010 | 257.2 ± 0.006 | 147.0 ± 0.013 | 164.6 ± 0.009 |
|
| 64.5 ± 0.004 | 18.4 ± 0.003 | 13.8 ± 0.007 | 19.0 ± 0.001 |
|
| 1080.5 ± 0.025 | 160.6 ± 0.007 | 8.1 ± 0.015 | 60.0 ± 0.011 |
|
| ||||
|
| ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | 81.4 ± 0.007 | 4.3 ± 0.009 | 37.5 ± 0.006 |
ND: not detected.
The levels of mineral contents in needles and berries of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus.
| Mineral Content mg/kg dw | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| 20,188 ± 1046 | 4609 ± 164 |
|
| 7953 ± 188 | 2778 ± 89 |
|
| 4539 ± 250 | 3413 ± 109 |
|
| 2312 ± 133 | 2415 ± 219 |
|
| 1681 ± 170 | 1613 ± 43 |
|
| ||
|
| 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.04 |
|
| 285.7 ± 49.07 | 59.66 ± 2.55 |
|
| 79.91 ± 15.97 | 29.78 ± 0.57 |
|
| 97.47 ± 16.16 | 59.01 ± 2.59 |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.17 | ND |
|
| 1.94 ± 0.43 | 1.91 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.99 ± 0.36 | 1.28 ± 0.42 |
|
| ||
|
| ND | ND |
ND: not detected.
Total phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant activities in aqueous and methanolic extracts of needles and berries of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus.
| Plant Material | Extraction Solvent | Polyphenols (mg GAE/g dw) | Flavonoids (mg QE/g dw) | Antioxidant Properties (IC50 Values; mg/mL) | Reducing Power (mg AAE/g dw) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | ABTS | Metal Chelating Activity | |||||
|
| Water | 147.29 ± 6.76 a | 28.66 ± 0.97 a | 0.12 ± 0.01 a | 0.47 ± 0.04 a | 1.53 ± 0.20 a | 89.70 ± 4.58 a |
| Methanol | 292.52 ± 11.68 b | 54.58 ± 2.98 b | 0.05 ± 0.00 b | 0.12 ± 0.00 b | 1.59 ± 0.11 a | 139.14 ± 2.77 b | |
|
| Water | 28.11 ± 3.11 c | 3.20 ± 0.79 c | 0.96 ± 0.07 c | 1.61 ± 0.26 c | 0.96 ± 0.03 b | 257.99 ± 2.16 c |
| Methanol | 131.48 ± 4.58 d | 8.28 ± 0.74 d | 0.09 ± 0.00 ab | 0.30 ± 0.01 ab | 1.89 ± 0.20 c | 941.81 ± 43.21 d | |
Values are means ± standard deviation of at least six determinations. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within conditions according to Tukey’s multiple range Test.
IC50 values of cytotoxic activity against MDA-MB-468, MCF-7 and PBMCs and % of viability on PBMCs at different concentrations of the extract and CisP. Cells were treated with methanolic extracts of needles and berries from Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus.
| Sample Tested | IC50 of Cytotoxic Activity Against Tumor Cells | % of Viability in PBMCs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA-MB-468 | MCF-7 | PBMCs | Concentration (µg/mL) | |||
| 12.5 | 3.125 | 0.78125 | ||||
| 14.30 ± 3.3 a | 10.10 ± 1.40 a | >50 a | 91.34 ± 7.72 a | 110.40 ± 9.51 a | 126.82 ± 10.70 a | |
| 6.40 ± 1.1 b | 5.20 ± 2.00 b | 49 a | 60.40 ± 7.68 a | 106.30 ± 1.89 a | 118.59 ± 5.56 a | |
| CisP | 0.20 ± 0.0 c | 2.20 ± 0.40 c | 0.27 b | 16.08 ± 3.39 b | 30.08 ± 3.58 b | 37.96 ± 3.44 b |
Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation of three independents replicates. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within conditions according to two-way ANOVA multiple comparison range Test.
Figure 1Clonogenic assay performed on MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells treated with 1 µg/mL of Joo neeedles or berries extract or cisplatin (0.1 µg/mL) for 10 days. (A) Sample plate images from the clonogenic assay; (B) total number of colonies formed; (C) survival fraction. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation of three independents measurements. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.001) within conditions according to one-way ANOVA multiple comparison range Test.
Figure 2H2O2 content (A and B) and MDA content (C and D) in the MDA-MB-468 (A and C) and MCF-7 (B and D) cell lines after treatment with methanolic extracts of Joo needles (Joo N) and Joo berries (Joo B). Each value represents the mean of six replicates. Bars represent the standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p = 0.05.
Figure 3Activities of antioxidative enzymes; superoxide dismutase (SOD, A and B) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx, C and D) in the MDA-MB-468 (A and C) and MCF-7 (B and D) cell lines after treatment with methanolic extracts of Joo needles (Joo N) and Joo berries (Joo B). Each value represents the mean of six replicates. Bars represent the standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p = 0.05.
Figure 4Activities of glutathione reductase (GR, A and B) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR, C and D) in the MDA-MB-468 (A and C) and MCF-7 (B and D) cell lines after treatment with methanolic extracts of Joo needles (Joo N) and Joo berries (Joo B). Each value represents the mean of six replicates. Bars represent the standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p = 0.05.
Figure 5ICDH enzyme activity in the MDA-MB-468 (A) and MCF-7 (B) cell lines after treatment with methanolic extracts of Joo needles (Joo N) and Joo berries (Joo B). Each value represents the mean of six replicates. Bars represent the standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p = 0.05.