BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Graph theory analysis of brain connectivity data is a promising tool for studying the function of the healthy and diseased brain. The consistency of resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) connectivity measures across multiple scanner types is an important factor in designing multi-institutional research studies and has important implications for the potential use of this technique in a heterogeneous clinical setting. We sought to quantitatively study the interscanner variability of rsfMRI graph theory metrics obtained from healthy volunteers scanned on three different scanner platforms. METHODS: In this prospective Institutional Review Board approved study, 9 healthy volunteers were enrolled for brain MRI on three 3T scanners (Magnetom Prisma, Skyra, and Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in three separate scan sessions within approximately 1 week. Standard preprocessing of rsfMRI was performed with SPM12. Subject scans were normalized to Montreal Neurologic Institute (MNI) space, and connectivity of 116 regions-of-interests based on the automated anatomic labeling (AAL) atlas was calculated using Conn toolbox. Whole-network graph theory metrics were calculated using Brain Connectivity Toolbox, and intraclass correlation (ICC) across three scan sessions was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 25 rsfMRI exams were completed in 9 subjects with a median-intersession time of 3 days. Among all three sessions, there was good to excellent agreement in characteristic path length and global efficiency (ICC: .79, .79) and good agreement in the transitivity, local efficiency, and clustering coefficient (ICC = .72, .69, .62). CONCLUSIONS: There was high consistency of graph theory metrics of rsfMRI connectivity networks among healthy volunteers scanned on three different generation 3T MRI scanners.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Graph theory analysis of brain connectivity data is a promising tool for studying the function of the healthy and diseased brain. The consistency of resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) connectivity measures across multiple scanner types is an important factor in designing multi-institutional research studies and has important implications for the potential use of this technique in a heterogeneous clinical setting. We sought to quantitatively study the interscanner variability of rsfMRI graph theory metrics obtained from healthy volunteers scanned on three different scanner platforms. METHODS: In this prospective Institutional Review Board approved study, 9 healthy volunteers were enrolled for brain MRI on three 3T scanners (Magnetom Prisma, Skyra, and Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in three separate scan sessions within approximately 1 week. Standard preprocessing of rsfMRI was performed with SPM12. Subject scans were normalized to Montreal Neurologic Institute (MNI) space, and connectivity of 116 regions-of-interests based on the automated anatomic labeling (AAL) atlas was calculated using Conn toolbox. Whole-network graph theory metrics were calculated using Brain Connectivity Toolbox, and intraclass correlation (ICC) across three scan sessions was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 25 rsfMRI exams were completed in 9 subjects with a median-intersession time of 3 days. Among all three sessions, there was good to excellent agreement in characteristic path length and global efficiency (ICC: .79, .79) and good agreement in the transitivity, local efficiency, and clustering coefficient (ICC = .72, .69, .62). CONCLUSIONS: There was high consistency of graph theory metrics of rsfMRI connectivity networks among healthy volunteers scanned on three different generation 3T MRI scanners.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Karla L Miller; Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Matthew Webster; Christian F Beckmann; Thomas E Nichols; Joseph D Ramsey; Mark W Woolrich Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Urs Braun; Michael M Plichta; Christine Esslinger; Carina Sauer; Leila Haddad; Oliver Grimm; Daniela Mier; Sebastian Mohnke; Andreas Heinz; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter; Nina Seiferth; Peter Kirsch; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Christine C Guo; Florian Kurth; Juan Zhou; Emeran A Mayer; Simon B Eickhoff; Joel H Kramer; William W Seeley Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 6.556