| Literature DB >> 30701722 |
Akash Swamy1,2, Gustav Burström3,4, Jarich W Spliethoff2, Drazenko Babic2, Christian Reich2, Joanneke Groen2, Erik Edström3,4, Adrian Elmi Terander3,4, John M Racadio5, Jenny Dankelman1, Benno H W Hendriks1,2.
Abstract
Safe and accurate placement of screws remains a critical issue in open and minimally invasive spine surgery. We propose to use diffuse reflectance (DR) spectroscopy as a sensing technology at the tip of a surgical instrument to ensure a safe path of the instrument through the cancellous bone of the vertebrae. This approach could potentially reduce the rate of cortical bone breaches, thereby resulting in fewer neural and vascular injuries during spinal fusion surgery. In our study, DR spectra in the wavelength ranges of 400 to 1600 nm were acquired from cancellous and cortical bone from three human cadavers. First, it was investigated whether these spectra can be used to distinguish between the two bone types based on fat, water, and blood content along with photon scattering. Subsequently, the penetration of the bone by an optical probe was simulated using the Monte-Carlo (MC) method, to study if the changes in fat content along the probe path would still enable distinction between the bone types. Finally, the simulation findings were validated via an experimental insertion of an optical screw probe into the vertebra aided by x-ray image guidance. The DR spectra indicate that the amount of fat, blood, and photon scattering is significantly higher in cancellous bone than in cortical bone (p < 0.01), which allows distinction between the bone types. The MC simulations showed a change in fat content more than 1 mm before the optical probe came in contact with the cortical bone. The experimental insertion of the optical screw probe gave similar results. This study shows that spectral tissue sensing, based on DR spectroscopy at the instrument tip, is a promising technology to identify the transition zone from cancellous to cortical vertebral bone. The technology therefore has the potential to improve the safety and accuracy of spinal screw placement procedures.Entities:
Keywords: Monte-Carlo; bone detection; optical sensing; reflectance spectroscopy; screw placement; spine surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30701722 PMCID: PMC6985697 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.017002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1(a) Schematic of the general experimental setup used to perform DR spectra measurements. (b) Bare optical probe used for cross-section experiment. (c) Optical screw probe used for image-guided insertion.
Fig. 2(a) Axial view of vertebra with grey scale images indicating cortical bone walls at various regions and (b) glass stencil with holes placed on top of a vertebra for spatial optical mapping.
Fig. 3(a) Cylindrical grid system used to model a tissue layer in MC simulations. (b) Modeling insertion of optical probe by recording the reflectance spectra of top tissue layer (in red) followed by tissue layer removal in steps.
Fig. 4Distribution of optical properties across cancellous and cortical vertebral bone types.
Optical properties summary data across vertebral bone type.
| Vertebral bone type | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Optical properties | Cancellous bone ( | Cortical bone ( | |
| Median | Median | ||
| Blood (%) | 4.2 | 2.1 | |
| Fat (%) | 17.4 | 3.2 | |
| Water (%) | 31.7 | 53.1 | 0.0115 |
| Scattering ( | 10.5 | 5.0 | |
Optical properties summary data across vertebral body regions.
| Optical properties | Vertebral body regions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner ( | Outer ( | ||
| Median | Median | ||
| Blood (%) | 4.0 | 2.8 | 0.04 |
| Fat (%) | 21.0 | 20.0 | 0.79 |
| Water (%) | 31.4 | 30.1 | 0.85 |
| Scattering ( | 9.9 | 9.7 | 0.95 |
Fig. 5Distribution of optical properties across vertebral body regions.
Fig. 6Distribution of cortical thickness across various vertebral regions.
Cortical thickness central tendencies across various vertebral regions.
| Vertebral region | Number of data points ( | Median (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal canal region | 201 | 1.5 |
| Anterior region | 171 | 2.8 |
| Pedicle region | 42 | 2.0 |
| Lamina region | 213 | 1.5 |
Fig. 7(a–c) Typical experimentally measured and MC simulated spectra of cancellous, cortical and surrounding tissue. (d–f) Wavelength-dependent absorption and scattering coefficients of the three tissue types.
Quantitative comparison of measured and simulated spectra based on fat content.
| Tissue type | Measured fat (%) | Simulation fat (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Cancellous bone | 34 | 35 |
| Cortical bone | 0 | 0 |
| Surrounding tissue | 26 | 29 |
Fig. 8Comparison between simulated and measured probe insertion. (a) Simulated changes in DR spectra during the transition of the modeled optical probe from cancellous bone to cortical bone. (b) Corresponding drop in simulated fat content. (c) X-ray image showing optical screw probe in cancellous bone. (d) Drop in measured fat content as the optical screw probe approaches cortical bone. (e) X-ray image showing the tip of optical screw probe in contact with cortical bone.