Literature DB >> 30700529

Interference Effects of Deleterious and Beneficial Mutations in Large Asexual Populations.

Kavita Jain1.   

Abstract

Linked beneficial and deleterious mutations are known to decrease the fixation probability of a favorable mutation in large asexual populations. While the hindering effect of strongly deleterious mutations on adaptive evolution has been well studied, how weakly deleterious mutations, either in isolation or with superior beneficial mutations, influence the rate of adaptation has not been fully explored. When the selection against the deleterious mutations is weak, the beneficial mutant can fix in many genetic backgrounds, besides the one it arose on. Here, taking this factor into account, I obtain an accurate analytical expression for the fixation probability of a beneficial mutant in an asexual population at mutation-selection balance. I then exploit this result along with clonal interference theory to investigate the joint effect of linked beneficial and deleterious mutations on the rate of adaptation, and identify parameter regions where it is reduced due to interference by either beneficial or deleterious or both types of mutations. I also study the evolution of mutation rates in adapting asexual populations, and find that linked beneficial mutations have a stronger influence than the deleterious mutations on mutator fixation.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  clonal interference; direct selection; indirect selection; mutation rates

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30700529      PMCID: PMC6456326          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.301960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  39 in total

1.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Fixation of beneficial mutations in the presence of epistatic interactions.

Authors:  Paulo R A Campos
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Igor M Rouzine; Daniel J Balick; Oskar Hallatschek; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Clonal interference in large populations.

Authors:  Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The fixation probability of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Z Patwa; L M Wahl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  F Taddei; M Radman; J Maynard-Smith; B Toupance; P H Gouyon; B Godelle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mutation rate dynamics in a bacterial population reflect tension between adaptation and genetic load.

Authors:  Sébastien Wielgoss; Jeffrey E Barrick; Olivier Tenaillon; Michael J Wiser; W James Dittmar; Stéphane Cruveiller; Béatrice Chane-Woon-Ming; Claudine Médigue; Richard E Lenski; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Sign of selection on mutation rate modifiers depends on population size.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Raynes; C Scott Wylie; Paul D Sniegowski; Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; Daniel P Rice; Mark J Hickman; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; David Botstein; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of weak clonal interference on average fitness trajectories in the presence of macroscopic epistasis.

Authors:  Yipei Guo; Ariel Amir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Decreased recent adaptation at human mendelian disease genes as a possible consequence of interference between advantageous and deleterious variants.

Authors:  Chenlu Di; Jesus Murga Moreno; Diego F Salazar-Tortosa; M Elise Lauterbur; David Enard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Soft selective sweeps: Addressing new definitions, evaluating competing models, and interpreting empirical outliers.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Wolfgang Stephan; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.020

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.