BACKGROUND: The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) is a probability-based, nationally representative survey conducted routinely to gather information about the American public's cancer-related beliefs and behaviors, including the use of cancer-related information. HINTS was created to produce national estimates and has lacked the ability to create accurate and precise state and regional estimates. The motivation for this current work was to create state- and regional-level estimates using a national sample (HINTS) through standard calibration methods. Health estimates at a local level can inform policy decisions that better target the cancer needs within a community. Local-level data allow researchers an opportunity to examine local populations in finer detail without additional costly data collection. METHODS: By combining seven cycles of HINTS data from 2012 to 2018 and then raking the previously created person-level weights, we were able to create tables and maps of HINTS subnational survey estimates for key outcomes that have small variances and little potential bias. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This paper describes the methods used to harmonize and aggregate data across cycles, create state- and regional-level estimates from the pooled data, and produce survey weights for the pooled datasets. It demonstrates both the opportunities and the challenges of pooled data analysis.
BACKGROUND: The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) is a probability-based, nationally representative survey conducted routinely to gather information about the American public's cancer-related beliefs and behaviors, including the use of cancer-related information. HINTS was created to produce national estimates and has lacked the ability to create accurate and precise state and regional estimates. The motivation for this current work was to create state- and regional-level estimates using a national sample (HINTS) through standard calibration methods. Health estimates at a local level can inform policy decisions that better target the cancer needs within a community. Local-level data allow researchers an opportunity to examine local populations in finer detail without additional costly data collection. METHODS: By combining seven cycles of HINTS data from 2012 to 2018 and then raking the previously created person-level weights, we were able to create tables and maps of HINTS subnational survey estimates for key outcomes that have small variances and little potential bias. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This paper describes the methods used to harmonize and aggregate data across cycles, create state- and regional-level estimates from the pooled data, and produce survey weights for the pooled datasets. It demonstrates both the opportunities and the challenges of pooled data analysis.
Authors: Jennifer D Parker; Makram Talih; Donald J Malec; Vladislav Beresovsky; Margaret Carroll; Joe F Gonzalez; Brady E Hamilton; Deborah D Ingram; Kenneth Kochanek; Frances McCarty; Chris Moriarity; Iris Shimizu; Alexander Strashny; Brian W Ward Journal: Vital Health Stat 2 Date: 2017-08
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Ronaldo Iachan; Lewis Berman; Tonja M Kyle; Kelly J Martin; Yangyang Deng; Davia N Moyse; Deirdre Middleton; Audie A Atienza Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sonia A Cunningham; Robert Yu; Tina Shih; Sharon Giordano; Lorna H McNeill; Ruth Rechis; Susan K Peterson; Paul Cinciripini; Lewis Foxhall; Ernest Hawk; Sanjay Shete Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Nadine J Barrett; Elisa M Rodriguez; Ronaldo Iachan; Terry Hyslop; Kearston L Ingraham; Gem M Le; Kelly Martin; Rodney C Haring; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Deborah O Erwin; Laura J Fish; Deirdre Middleton; Robert A Hiatt; Steven R Patierno; Urmimala Sarkar; Elizabeth A Gage-Bouchard Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ronaldo Iachan; Carol Pierannunzi; Kristie Healey; Kurt J Greenlund; Machell Town Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Victoria G Skolnick; Terisa Davis; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196