Literature DB >> 35183948

State and regional estimates using seven cycles of pooled nationally representative HINTS data.

Lee Harding1, Ronaldo Iachan1, Kelly Martin1, Yangyang Deng1, Deirdre Middleton2, Richard Moser3, Kelly Blake3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) is a probability-based, nationally representative survey conducted routinely to gather information about the American public's cancer-related beliefs and behaviors, including the use of cancer-related information. HINTS was created to produce national estimates and has lacked the ability to create accurate and precise state and regional estimates. The motivation for this current work was to create state- and regional-level estimates using a national sample (HINTS) through standard calibration methods. Health estimates at a local level can inform policy decisions that better target the cancer needs within a community. Local-level data allow researchers an opportunity to examine local populations in finer detail without additional costly data collection.
METHODS: By combining seven cycles of HINTS data from 2012 to 2018 and then raking the previously created person-level weights, we were able to create tables and maps of HINTS subnational survey estimates for key outcomes that have small variances and little potential bias. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: This paper describes the methods used to harmonize and aggregate data across cycles, create state- and regional-level estimates from the pooled data, and produce survey weights for the pooled datasets. It demonstrates both the opportunities and the challenges of pooled data analysis.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer epidemiology; Pooled data; Regional estimates; Survey weights

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35183948      PMCID: PMC9383055          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   5.379


  15 in total

1.  Americans' Trust in Health Information Sources: Trends and Sociodemographic Predictors.

Authors:  Devlon N Jackson; Emily B Peterson; Kelly D Blake; Kisha Coa; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2019-07-23

2.  National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.

Authors:  Jennifer D Parker; Makram Talih; Donald J Malec; Vladislav Beresovsky; Margaret Carroll; Joe F Gonzalez; Brady E Hamilton; Deborah D Ingram; Kenneth Kochanek; Frances McCarty; Chris Moriarity; Iris Shimizu; Alexander Strashny; Brian W Ward
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2017-08

3.  Prevalence of e-Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Hongying Dai; Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

6.  Weighting Nonprobability and Probability Sample Surveys in Describing Cancer Catchment Areas.

Authors:  Ronaldo Iachan; Lewis Berman; Tonja M Kyle; Kelly J Martin; Yangyang Deng; Davia N Moyse; Deirdre Middleton; Audie A Atienza
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.

Authors:  Sonia A Cunningham; Robert Yu; Tina Shih; Sharon Giordano; Lorna H McNeill; Ruth Rechis; Susan K Peterson; Paul Cinciripini; Lewis Foxhall; Ernest Hawk; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

Authors:  Nadine J Barrett; Elisa M Rodriguez; Ronaldo Iachan; Terry Hyslop; Kearston L Ingraham; Gem M Le; Kelly Martin; Rodney C Haring; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Deborah O Erwin; Laura J Fish; Deirdre Middleton; Robert A Hiatt; Steven R Patierno; Urmimala Sarkar; Elizabeth A Gage-Bouchard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  National weighting of data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Authors:  Ronaldo Iachan; Carol Pierannunzi; Kristie Healey; Kurt J Greenlund; Machell Town
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Victoria G Skolnick; Terisa Davis; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.