Literature DB >> 30697462

FDG PET imaging in multiple myeloma: implications for response assessments in clinical trials.

Suchitra Sundaram1, James Driscoll2,3, Mariano Fernandez-Ulloa4, Marcos de Lima1, Ehsan Malek1.   

Abstract

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is an effective modality to assess disease burden, detect extra-medullary disease and monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This modality of imaging is incorporated in the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria that are widely used in MM clinical trials. Interpretative pitfalls are commonly encountered in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies and proper interpretation requires knowledge of the normal physiologic distribution of the tracer affecting available 18F-FDG for tumor tissue uptake. We describe a series of MM patients who exhibited a deep response to treatment, based on clinical features, serum markers and bone marrow (BM) biopsy. However, these patients seemed to have new lesions on post-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT images which could be interpreted as progressive disease according to the IMWG criteria. Sequestration phenomenon, which is the disappearance of 18F-FDG sequestration by myeloma-infiltrated marrow after successful anti-myeloma therapy, could lead to unmasking of new 18F-FDG-avid lesions on post-therapy PET/CT due to higher 18F-FDG bioavailability to residual tumor tissue. Clinical correlation, awareness of the 18F-FDG sequestration in myeloma infiltrated BM and its impact on other 18F-FDG avid areas in the body are necessary to avoid potential pitfalls in end-of-treatment imaging interpretation. While considering patients for clinical trials, clinicians should be mindful of this sequestration phenomenon in the interpretation of post-therapy PET/CT imaging in MM patients with initially heavily infiltrated marrow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG PET imaging; clinical trials; multiple myeloma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30697462      PMCID: PMC6334211     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  19 in total

Review 1.  Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine.

Authors:  G J Cook; M N Maisey; I Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10

2.  Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; R Edward Coleman; Milton J Guiberteau; Manuel L Brown; Henry D Royal; Barry A Siegel; David W Townsend; Lincoln L Berland; J Anthony Parker; Karl Hubner; Michael G Stabin; George Zubal; Marc Kachelriess; Valerie Cronin; Scott Holbrook
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Alan D Waxman; Allesandro D'Agnolo; Cindy M Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Brian Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Joan Blade; Paul Richardson; Robert Orlowski; David Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Antonio Palumbo; Jeffrey Zonder; Heinz Ludwig; David Vesole; Orhan Sezer; Nikhil C Munshi; Jesus San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation.

Authors:  Elena Zamagni; Francesca Patriarca; Cristina Nanni; Beatrice Zannetti; Emanuela Englaro; Annalisa Pezzi; Paola Tacchetti; Silvia Buttignol; Giulia Perrone; Annamaria Brioli; Lucia Pantani; Carolina Terragna; Francesca Carobolante; Michele Baccarani; Renato Fanin; Stefano Fanti; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Effects of pegfilgrastim on normal biodistribution of 18F-FDG: preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Heather A Jacene; Takayoshi Ishimori; James M Engles; Sophie Leboulleux; Vered Stearns; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Decreased brain FDG uptake in patients with extensive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lesions.

Authors:  Kohei Hanaoka; Makoto Hosono; Taro Shimono; Kimio Usami; Yoshihiro Komeya; Norio Tsuchiya; Yuzuru Yamazoe; Kazunari Ishii; Youichi Tatsumi; Mitsugu Sumita
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Correcting tumour SUV for enhanced bone marrow uptake: retrospective 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.

Authors:  Boon-Keng Teo; Shiva Badiee; Mohiuddin Hadi; Tuwin Lam; Lauran Johnson; Youngho Seo; Stephen L Bacharach; Bruce H Hasegawa; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  MRI and PET/MRI in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Marius E Mayerhoefer; Stephen J Archibald; Christina Messiou; Anton Staudenherz; Dominik Berzaczy; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.