Literature DB >> 16741304

Effects of pegfilgrastim on normal biodistribution of 18F-FDG: preclinical and clinical studies.

Heather A Jacene1, Takayoshi Ishimori, James M Engles, Sophie Leboulleux, Vered Stearns, Richard L Wahl.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, on the normal biodistribution of (18)F-FDG in an animal model and in humans.
METHODS: Two groups of 12 rats received a single subcutaneous injection of either normal saline or pegfilgrastim. One, 7, 14, and 21 d after injection, biodistribution studies were performed 1 h after (18)F-FDG injection. Sixteen breast cancer patients underwent baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT and, approximately 1 wk after receiving 1 dose of docetaxel and adjunctive pegfilgrastim, follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT (scan 2). Standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL) were determined for several normal organs before and after therapy.
RESULTS: In rats, bone marrow (18)F-FDG uptake (standardized uptake value) was higher in the pegfilgrastim group 1 d after injection (mean +/- SD, 8.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2, P < 0.05), whereas (18)F-FDG uptake in blood was lower (0.41 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.01, P < 0.05). In patients, mean SUL was higher in bone marrow (4.49 +/- 1.50 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.22, P < 0.0001), spleen (3.29 +/- 0.83 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.23, P < 0.0001), and liver (1.45 +/- 0.25 vs. 1.31 +/- 0.23, P = 0.01) but lower in brain (4.18 +/- 0.76 vs. 5.14 +/- 1.44, P < 0.01) on scan 2 than on the baseline scan.
CONCLUSION: In both the animal model and humans, pegfilgrastim markedly increased bone marrow uptake of (18)F-FDG and reduced (18)F-FDG uptake in some normal tissues. These profound alterations in (18)F-FDG biodistribution induced by pegfilgrastim must be considered when one is evaluating quantitative (18)F-FDG PET scans for tumor response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16741304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  14 in total

1.  C11-acetate and F-18 FDG PET for men with prostate cancer bone metastases: relative findings and response to therapy.

Authors:  Evan Y Yu; Mark Muzi; Joy A Hackenbracht; Brian B Rezvani; Jeanne M Link; Robert Bruce Montgomery; Celestia S Higano; Janet F Eary; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Scalene muscle uptake: a potential pitfall in head and neck PET/CT.

Authors:  Heather A Jacene; Behnaz Goudarzi; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Optimizing the interval between G-CSF therapy and F-18 FDG PET imaging in children and young adults receiving chemotherapy for sarcoma.

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Susan E Sharp; Brian K Turpin; Bin Zhang; Michael J Gelfand
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-03

4.  Altered FDG uptake patterns in pediatric lymphoblastic lymphoma patients receiving induction chemotherapy that includes very high dose corticosteroids.

Authors:  Susan E Sharp; Michael J Gelfand; Michael J Absalon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

5.  The distribution of FDG at PET examinations constitutes a relative mechanism: significant effects at activity quantification in patients with a high muscular uptake.

Authors:  Henry Lindholm; Ove Johansson; Cathrine Jonsson; Hans Jacobsson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Systemic Immune Response to Vaccination on FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Mark Mingos; Stephanie Howard; Nicholas Giacalone; David Kozono; Heather Jacene
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-09

7.  TBCRC 008: early change in 18F-FDG uptake on PET predicts response to preoperative systemic therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Jeffrey P Leal; Matthew P Goetz; Zhe Zhang; Xian C Zhou; Lisa K Jacobs; Joyce Mhlanga; Joo H O; John Carpenter; Anna Maria Storniolo; Stanley Watkins; John H Fetting; Robert S Miller; Kostandinos Sideras; Stacie C Jeter; Bridget Walsh; Penny Powers; Jane Zorzi; Judy C Boughey; Nancy E Davidson; Lisa A Carey; Antonio C Wolff; Nagi Khouri; Edward Gabrielson; Richard L Wahl; Vered Stearns
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Dynamic and static approaches to quantifying 18F-FDG uptake for measuring cancer response to therapy, including the effect of granulocyte CSF.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Paul E Kinahan; Brenda F Kurland; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  FDG PET imaging in multiple myeloma: implications for response assessments in clinical trials.

Authors:  Suchitra Sundaram; James Driscoll; Mariano Fernandez-Ulloa; Marcos de Lima; Ehsan Malek
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-20

10.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.