Literature DB >> 18317301

Correcting tumour SUV for enhanced bone marrow uptake: retrospective 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.

Boon-Keng Teo1, Shiva Badiee, Mohiuddin Hadi, Tuwin Lam, Lauran Johnson, Youngho Seo, Stephen L Bacharach, Bruce H Hasegawa, Benjamin L Franc.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The concentration of F-FDG in the bone marrow is usually low. One common cause of high uptake is due to bone marrow stimulating drugs administered in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. It has been hypothesized that the sequestration of F-FDG to the bone marrow may reduce the standardized uptake value (SUV) of a tumour. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying total F-FDG uptake in the bone marrow of patients with visibly enhanced bone marrow uptake and computing its effect on tumour SUV.
METHODS: Total F-FDG in bone marrow was measured in two groups of PET/CT studies: one (n=19) with visibly enhanced bone marrow, the other (n=5), a baseline group with 'normal' levels of uptake. To measure the F-FDG in bone marrow, the entire skeleton in the CT was segmented from surrounding tissue, and the resulting volume applied to the PET image. Using kinetic analysis we show that the predicted correction factor to tumour SUV is given by (1-q0/Q)/(1-q/Q), where Q is the injected dose, and q and q0 are enhanced and baseline bone marrow uptake (MBq).
RESULTS: The enhanced bone marrow uptake averaged 8.9+/-3.2% of injected dose (15.2% max) vs. 4.2+/-0.4% (4.6% max) at baseline. This resulted in a predicted artificial decrease in tumour SUV of up to 11.5% (4.9+/-4.3%, on average).
CONCLUSION: Enhanced bone marrow uptake is predicted to reduce tumour SUVs by as much as 11.5% in our patient group and is a potential confounding factor in using SUV for monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317301     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f44f99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  The distribution of FDG at PET examinations constitutes a relative mechanism: significant effects at activity quantification in patients with a high muscular uptake.

Authors:  Henry Lindholm; Ove Johansson; Cathrine Jonsson; Hans Jacobsson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Fatal hypoglycemia in malignant pheochromocytoma: direct glucose consumption as suggested by (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mouhammed Amir Habra; Rodolfo Núñez; Hubert Chuang; Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez; Thereasa Rich; Karen Kyle; Camilo Jimenez
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Role of PET quantitation in the monitoring of cancer response to treatment: Review of approaches and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Elizabeth S McDonald; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01

5.  FDG PET imaging in multiple myeloma: implications for response assessments in clinical trials.

Authors:  Suchitra Sundaram; James Driscoll; Mariano Fernandez-Ulloa; Marcos de Lima; Ehsan Malek
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-20

6.  Comprehensive analysis of the influence of G-CSF on the biodistribution of 18F-FDG in lymphoma patients: insights for PET/CT scheduling.

Authors:  Magno Oliveira; Charline Lasnon; Catherine Nganoa; Anne-Claire Gac; Gandhi Damaj; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.138

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.