| Literature DB >> 30696046 |
Siphokazi Moloinyane1, Felix Nchu2.
Abstract
Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi are being explored for the management of phytophagous insect pests. The effects of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales) inoculation of grape plants on the infestation level of P. ficus, tissue nutrient contents, and growth and volatile constituents of potted grape plants were assessed. Grapevine plants were individually inoculated with a suspension of 1 × 10⁸ conidia mL-1 of B. bassiana by drenching before experimentally infesting each of them with thirty adult females of P. ficus. At four weeks post-treatment, the fungus was re-isolated from leaves of 50% of the fungus-exposed plants. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in all the plant growth parameters measured in the fungus-treated and control plants. Plant tissue analysis revealed markedly higher contents of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) in the leaf tissue of plants exposed to the B. bassiana relative to the control. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses showed that a significantly (X² = 5.1; p < 0.02) higher number of known anti-insect volatile compounds (nine) were present among fungus treated plants compared to the control plants (five). Naphthalene, which is toxic to insects and humans, was detected only in the volatiles of the fungus-exposed plants. B. bassiana did not have any significant effect on total polyphenol, alkaloid, and flavonoids. Overall, treatment with fungus did not inhibit the infestation by P. ficus. In conclusion, these findings shed light on some of the mechanisms involved in endophytic fungus-plant-insect interactions.Entities:
Keywords: Beauveria bassiana; Planococcus ficus; endophytes; grapevine; volatiles
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30696046 PMCID: PMC6409710 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11020072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Mean growth ±SE of V. vinifera exposed to B. bassiana inoculum and control treatment for four weeks under greenhouse conditions.
| Treatment | Plant Height | Leaf Count | Number of Shoots | Dry Weight Roots (g) | Dry Weight Shoots (g) | Wet Weight Roots (g) | Wet Weight Shoots (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fungus | 97 ± 9a | 30 ± 3a | 3 ± 0.2a | 8 ± 0.6a | 66 ± 49a | 35 ± 3a | 31 ± 3a |
| Control | 101 ± 7a | 25 ± 4a | 3 ± 0.3a | 8 ± 0.9a | 17 ± 2a | 33 ± 2a | 33 ± 4a |
a: Means followed by same lowercase letter in a column (Table 1) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) following comparison of fungus and control treatments using Tukey’s test.
Tissue nutrients contents (Mean ± SE) in shoots of V. vinifera plants exposed to control and B. bassiana inoculum for four weeks under greenhouse conditions. Nitrogen = N, phosphorus = P, potassium = K, calcium = Ca, magnesium = Mg, sodium = Na, manganese = Mn, iron = Fe, copper = Cu, zinc = Z, and boron = B.
| Treatment | Quantity (mg/kg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Na | Mn | Fe | Cu | Zn | B | |
| Control | 23,433 ± 912a | 5900 ± 717a | 27,583 ± 1200a | 13,266 ± 939b | 2866 ± 158b | 6624 ± 337a | 47 ± 4a | 321 ± 65a | 4 ± 0.2a | 60 ± 3a | 26 ± 1a |
| Fungus | 23,500 ± 657a | 4500 ± 265a | 27,450 ± 987a | 16,633 ± 544a | 3316 ± 47a | 8446 ± 760a | 49 ± 3a | 243 ± 13a | 5 ± 0.1a | 68 ± 2a | 27 ± 0.5a |
a,b: Means followed by same lowercase letter in a column (Table 2) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) following comparison of fungus and control treatments using Tukey’s test.
Mean number of Planococcus ficus (immature [larvae] and adult females) on the control and the Beauveria bassiana-inoculated plants at four weeks after the commencement of experiment under greenhouse conditions (6 replicates per treatment).
| Treatment | Mean No. of Insects | |
|---|---|---|
| Immature | Adult | |
| Fungus | 27 ± 4 | 19 ± 1.3 |
| Control | 31 ± 5 | 18 ± 2.2 |
Secondary metabolite contents in shoots of grapevine following exposure to B. bassiana inoculum and control treatment.
| Treatment | Polyphenol | Flavonols | Alkaloids |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8 ± 0.5 | 3 ± 0.3 | N.D. |
| Fungus | 8 ± 0.5 | 3 ± 0.3 | N.D. |
N.D.: Not detected.
Volatile organic compounds with a match quality of at least 90% present in fungal treatment and control shoots of grapevine.
| Control | Fungus |
|---|---|
| 1,2–Benzenedicarboxylic acid * | 1–Hexanol |
| 1–Hexanol | 2–Heptenal |
| 1–Octadecene * | 2–Hexen–1–ol |
| 2–Furancarboxaldehyde * | 2–Hexenoic acid * |
| 2–Heptenal | 3–Hexen–1–ol |
| 2–Hexen–1–ol | 3–Hexenoic acid |
| 3–Hexen–1–ol | 6–Methyl–5–Hepten–2–one |
| 3–Hexenoic acid | alpha.–Terpinolene * |
| 6–Methyl–5–Hepten–2–one | Benzaldehyde |
| Benzaldehyde | Benzene * |
| Benzeneethanol | Benzeneethanol |
| Benzoic acid * | Benzofuranone * |
| Benzyl alcohol * | beta–Pinene |
| beta–Pinene | Butanoic acid * |
| CIS–3–Hexenol | CIS–3–Hexenol |
| CIS–3–Hexenyl Caproate * | CIS–3–Hexenyl alpha. Methyl butyrate * |
| CIS–3–Hexenyl ISO–Butyrate * | CIS–3–hexenyl Valerate * |
| Citral | Citral |
| Cyclododecane * | Cyclohexasiloxane |
| Cyclohexadecane * | Cyclooctatetraene * |
| Cyclohexasiloxane | Cyclopentasiloxane * |
| Decanal * | Cyclotetrasiloxane * |
| Dodecanoic acid | delta–cadinene * |
| Farnesene * | E–3–hexenyl hexanoate * |
| gamma–Bisabolene * | Ethyl phthalate * |
| gamma–Terpinene | Ethylidenecyclohexane * |
| Geraniol | Farnesyl acetone * |
| Geranylacetone | gamma–Terpinene |
| Heptadecanoic acid * | Geranial * |
| Hexadecanoic acid * | Geraniol |
| Hexanal | Geranylacetone |
| Limonene | Heptadecene * |
| Linoleic acid * | Hexanal |
| Muskolactone * | Limonene |
| Myrcene | m–Cymene * |
| Myristic acid * | Myrcene |
| Octadecanoic acid * | Naphthalene * |
| Octanal | Nerolidol * |
| Oleic acid * | Octanal |
| p–Cymene * | Pentanoic acid * |
| Pentadecanoic acid * | Phenylethyl alcohol* |
| Pentenal * | Styrene |
| Squalene * | Tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane |
| Styrene | Trans 2–Hexenoic acid * |
| Tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane | Trans,Trans–2,4–Heptadienal * |
| Thiosulfuric acid * | Trans–beta–Ocimene * |
| Trans–2–Hexenal * | |
| Trans–Geraniol * | |
| Z–3–hexenyl 2–methylbutanoate * |
*: A compound in Table 5 that was only detected in either the control or fungus treated plant(s).
Selected well-known and published anti-insect volatiles that were also detected in Vitis vinifera in this study and their relative area ratios following gas chromatography-linked mass spectrometry analysis of control and fungus-treated plants.
| Anti-Insect Compound | Reference | Area Ratio | Area Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benzaldehyde | Paulraj et al. [ | 0.23 ± 0.1a | 0.24 ± 0.04a |
| Limonene | Hebeish et al. [ | 4.5 ± 1.2a | 2.4 ± 1.3a |
| Geraniol | Maia and Moore [ | 0.19 ± 0.04a | 0.29 ± 0.05a |
| Geranylacetone | Maia and Moore [ | - | 0.52 ± 0.1a |
| gamma-Terpinene | Wang et al. [ | - | 1.48 ± 0.4a |
| beta-Pinene | Dambolena et al. [ | 0.94 ± 0.21a | 0.41 ± 0.25a |
| Napthelene | Daisy et al. [ | - | 0.23 ± 0.02a |
| M-Cymene | Chang et al. [ | - | 0.5 ± 0.1a |
| Citral | Oyedele et al [ | 0.03 ± 0.03a | 0.06 ± 0.06a |
| No. of compounds | 5 | 9 * |
* Denotes significantly higher (DF = 1; X2 = 5.1 and p = 0.02) number of compounds present following Pearson Chi square test in Table 6. a: Means followed by same lowercase letter in a column (Table 6) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) following comparison of fungus and control treatments using Tukey’s test.