Arusha Acharyya1, Yunhui Ge2, Haifan Wu3, William F DeGrado3, Vincent A Voelz2, Feng Gai1. 1. Department of Chemistry , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States. 2. Department of Chemistry , Temple University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19122 , United States. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry , University of California , San Francisco , California 94158 , United States.
Abstract
One of the fundamental events in protein folding is α-helix formation, which involves sequential development of a series of helical hydrogen bonds between the backbone C═O group of residues i and the -NH group of residues i + 4. While we now know a great deal about α-helix folding dynamics, a key question that remains to be answered is where the productive helical nucleation event occurs. Statistically, a helical nucleus (or the first helical hydrogen-bond) can form anywhere within the peptide sequence in question; however, the one that leads to productive folding may only form at a preferred location. This consideration is based on the fact that the α-helical structure is inherently asymmetric, due to the specific alignment of the helical hydrogen bonds. While this hypothesis is plausible, validating it is challenging because there is not an experimental observable that can be used to directly pinpoint the location of the productive nucleation process. Therefore, in this study we combine several techniques, including peptide cross-linking, laser-induced temperature-jump infrared spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations, to tackle this challenge. Taken together, our experimental and simulation results support an α-helix folding mechanism wherein the productive nucleus is formed at the N-terminus, which propagates toward the C-terminal end of the peptide to yield the folded structure. In addition, our results show that incorporation of a cross-linker can lead to formation of differently folded conformations, underscoring the need for all-atom simulations to quantitatively assess the proposed cross-linking design.
One of the fundamental events in protein folding is α-helix formation, which involves sequential development of a series of helical hydrogen bonds between the backbone C═O group of residues i and the -n class="Chemical">NH group of residues i + 4. While we now know a great deal about α-helix folding dynamics, a key question that remains to be answered is where the productive helical nucleation event occurs. Statistically, a helical nucleus (or the first helical hydrogen-bond) can form anywhere within the peptide sequence in question; however, the one that leads to productive folding may only form at a preferred location. This consideration is based on the fact that the α-helical structure is inherently asymmetric, due to the specific alignment of the helical hydrogen bonds. While this hypothesis is plausible, validating it is challenging because there is not an experimental observable that can be used to directly pinpoint the location of the productive nucleation process. Therefore, in this study we combine several techniques, including peptide cross-linking, laser-induced temperature-jump infrared spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations, to tackle this challenge. Taken together, our experimental and simulation results support an α-helix folding mechanism wherein the productive nucleus is formed at the N-terminus, which propagates toward the C-terminal end of the peptide to yield the folded structure. In addition, our results show that incorporation of a cross-linker can lead to formation of differently folded conformations, underscoring the need for all-atom simulations to quantitatively assess the proposed cross-linking design.
Authors: Cheng-Yen Huang; Zelleka Getahun; Yongjin Zhu; Jason W Klemke; William F DeGrado; Feng Gai Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-02-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Md Shafiqul Islam; Samuel L Junod; Si Zhang; Zakey Yusuf Buuh; Yifu Guan; Mi Zhao; Kishan H Kaneria; Parmila Kafley; Carson Cohen; Robert Maloney; Zhigang Lyu; Vincent A Voelz; Weidong Yang; Rongsheng E Wang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 14.919