Literature DB >> 33759131

Markov State Models to Elucidate Ligand Binding Mechanism.

Yunhui Ge1, Vincent A Voelz2.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations can now routinely access the microsecond timescale, making feasible direct sampling of ligand association events. While Markov State Model (MSM) approaches offer a useful framework for analyzing such trajectory data to gain insight into binding mechanisms, accurate modeling of ligand association pathways and kinetics must be done carefully. We describe methods and good practices for constructing MSMs of ligand binding from unbiased trajectory data and discuss how to use time-lagged independent component analysis (tICA) to build informative models, using as an example recent simulation work to model the binding of phenylalanine to the regulatory ACT domain dimer of phenylalanine hydroxylase. We describe a variety of methods for estimating association rates from MSMs and discuss how to distinguish between conformational selection and induced-fit mechanisms using MSMs. In addition, we review some examples of MSMs constructed to elucidate the mechanisms by which p53 transactivation domain (TAD) and related peptides bind the oncoprotein MDM2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allostery; Binding rates; Conformational selection; Dimensionality reduction; Induced-fit; Kinetic network models; Ligand association pathways; Molecular dynamics simulation; Protein–protein interactions; Time-lagged independent component analysis (tICA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33759131     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1209-5_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  74 in total

1.  Peptide Binding to a PDZ Domain by Electrostatic Steering via Nonnative Salt Bridges.

Authors:  Nicolas Blöchliger; Min Xu; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ignasi Buch; Toni Giorgino; Gianni De Fabritiis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Ron O Dror; Albert C Pan; Daniel H Arlow; David W Borhani; Paul Maragakis; Yibing Shan; Huafeng Xu; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quantitative Characterization of the Binding and Unbinding of Millimolar Drug Fragments with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Albert C Pan; Huafeng Xu; Timothy Palpant; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Efficient Atomistic Simulation of Pathways and Calculation of Rate Constants for a Protein-Peptide Binding Process: Application to the MDM2 Protein and an Intrinsically Disordered p53 Peptide.

Authors:  Matthew C Zwier; Adam J Pratt; Joshua L Adelman; Joseph W Kaus; Daniel M Zuckerman; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Simulations of the regulatory ACT domain of human phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) unveil its mechanism of phenylalanine binding.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Elias Borne; Shannon Stewart; Michael R Hansen; Emilia C Arturo; Eileen K Jaffe; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A role for both conformational selection and induced fit in ligand binding by the LAO protein.

Authors:  Daniel-Adriano Silva; Gregory R Bowman; Alejandro Sosa-Peinado; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Protein-peptide association kinetics beyond the seconds timescale from atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Fabian Paul; Christoph Wehmeyer; Esam T Abualrous; Hao Wu; Michael D Crabtree; Johannes Schöneberg; Jane Clarke; Christian Freund; Thomas R Weikl; Frank Noé
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Quantitatively characterizing the ligand binding mechanisms of choline binding protein using Markov state model analysis.

Authors:  Shuo Gu; Daniel-Adriano Silva; Luming Meng; Alexander Yue; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The pathway of ligand entry from the membrane bilayer to a lipid G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Nathaniel Stanley; Leonardo Pardo; Gianni De Fabritiis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimation of binding rates and affinities from multiensemble Markov models and ligand decoupling.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.