C Barrett Bowling1,2, Heather E Whitson1,2,3, Theodore M Johnson4,5. 1. Durham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Duke Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC. 4. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Decatur, Georgia. 5. Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To address the underrepresentation of older adults in clinical research, the National Institutes of Health will require investigators to include individuals across the lifespan. As investigators from other fields endeavor to recruit participants who are more representative of the patient population, geriatricians may have the opportunity to influence a broad range of research studies in older adults. Our aims were to elicit challenges to inclusion of older adults in clinical research and to develop a preliminary framework for communicating these challenges to non-geriatrics-trained researchers. DESIGN: Communication framework development. SETTING: Academic hospital and Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Nongeriatrician researchers and staff, aging research experts. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews were used to elicit challenges nongeriatrician investigators and research staff experience when conducting research that includes older adults and then solicit experienced aging researchers' responses to these challenges. RESULTS: Challenges described by nongeriatrician investigators included lack of knowledge, rigid study structures, and a disease-focused approach. Responses from our geriatrics experts included communicating practical advice for avoiding common pitfalls. Our resulting framework is the 5Ts: Target Population, Team, Tools, Time, and Tips to Accommodate. This tool complements the 5Ms (Mind, Mobility, Medications, Multicomplexity, and Matters Most to Me) model for geriatric care and emphasizes representation of the Target Population, building research Teams that include aging expertise, incorporating appropriate Tools for function and patient-reported outcomes, anticipating Time for longer study visits, and accommodating common needs with practical Tips. Limitations include convenience sampling and lack of formal qualitative thematic analysis. CONCLUSION: Communicating with nongeriatrician researchers using the 5Ts may offer a practical approach to avoiding barriers to inclusion of older adults in research and complements an existing framework for communicating the value of geriatric medicine. Next steps in developing the 5Ts will be to include additional stakeholders (eg, national samples of nongeriatrician investigators, older adults and their families) and evaluating the impact of its implementation. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:342-346, 2019. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To address the underrepresentation of older adults in clinical research, the National Institutes of Health will require investigators to include individuals across the lifespan. As investigators from other fields endeavor to recruit participants who are more representative of the patient population, geriatricians may have the opportunity to influence a broad range of research studies in older adults. Our aims were to elicit challenges to inclusion of older adults in clinical research and to develop a preliminary framework for communicating these challenges to non-geriatrics-trained researchers. DESIGN: Communication framework development. SETTING: Academic hospital and Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Nongeriatrician researchers and staff, aging research experts. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews were used to elicit challenges nongeriatrician investigators and research staff experience when conducting research that includes older adults and then solicit experienced aging researchers' responses to these challenges. RESULTS: Challenges described by nongeriatrician investigators included lack of knowledge, rigid study structures, and a disease-focused approach. Responses from our geriatrics experts included communicating practical advice for avoiding common pitfalls. Our resulting framework is the 5Ts: Target Population, Team, Tools, Time, and Tips to Accommodate. This tool complements the 5Ms (Mind, Mobility, Medications, Multicomplexity, and Matters Most to Me) model for geriatric care and emphasizes representation of the Target Population, building research Teams that include aging expertise, incorporating appropriate Tools for function and patient-reported outcomes, anticipating Time for longer study visits, and accommodating common needs with practical Tips. Limitations include convenience sampling and lack of formal qualitative thematic analysis. CONCLUSION: Communicating with nongeriatrician researchers using the 5Ts may offer a practical approach to avoiding barriers to inclusion of older adults in research and complements an existing framework for communicating the value of geriatric medicine. Next steps in developing the 5Ts will be to include additional stakeholders (eg, national samples of nongeriatrician investigators, older adults and their families) and evaluating the impact of its implementation. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:342-346, 2019. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
5Ts; communication framework; geriatrics research; inclusion of older adults
Authors: Donna M Zulman; Jeremy B Sussman; Xisui Chen; Christine T Cigolle; Caroline S Blaum; Rodney A Hayward Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; James S Kaufman; Kenneth E Covinsky; C Seth Landefeld; Lynne V McFarland; Eric B Larson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Karen Barnett; Stewart W Mercer; Michael Norbury; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Darina V Petrovsky; Lan N Ðoàn; Maria Loizos; Rachel O'Conor; Micah Prochaska; Mazie Tsang; Rachel Hopman-Droste; Tara C Klinedinst; Aarti Mathur; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Odette van der Willik; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2022-01-07
Authors: Katherine M Hunold; Elizabeth M Goldberg; Jeffrey M Caterino; Ula Hwang; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Manish N Shah; Tony Rosen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 3.451