Literature DB >> 30689930

Effects of temperament at feedlot arrival and breed type on growth efficiency, feeding behavior, and carcass value in finishing heifers.

Cameron A Olson1, Gordon E Carstens1, Andy D Herring1, Daniel S Hale1, William C Kayser1, Rhonda K Miller1.   

Abstract

Objectives were to evaluate the effects of temperament at feedlot arrival and breed type on productivity, feed efficiency, feeding behavior, and carcass quality traits in finishing beef heifers, and to examine interactions between temperament and breed type. Heifers (Angus, Braford, Brangus, and Simbrah, N = 411, BW = 280 kg) were fed a high-grain diet (ME = 3.0 Mcal/kg DM) in pens equipped with electronic feed bunks. Quality grade (QG), yield grade (YG), and Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) force values (day 1 and 14 postmortem) were evaluated. Relative exit velocity (REV) at feedlot arrival was used as a covariate in mixed models to assess the effects of temperament and interactions with breed type, with means compared at ±1 SD from the mean initial REV. Calm heifers (mean REV minus 1 SD) had 4% greater (P < 0.001) initial BW, 12% greater (P < 0.001) ADG, 8% greater (P < 0.001) DMI, and 4% greater (P < 0.02) G:F than heifers with excitable temperaments (mean REV plus 1 SD). A temperament × breed interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for residual feed intake (RFI). Braford heifers had a more (P < 0.05) negative REV covariate slope (-1.49 ± 0.65) than the other breeds, such that excitable Braford heifers had lower (P < 0.05) RFI than the other breeds with excitable temperaments. Temperament × breed interactions were observed (P < 0.001) for DMI per BW0.75 and bunk visit (BV) duration. Braford heifers had more (P < 0.05) negative REV covariate slopes for both traits than Angus, Brangus, and Simbrah heifers such that excitable Braford heifers consumed less (P < 0.05) DMI per BW0.75 and had less BV duration compared to excitable Angus and Brangus heifers. Calm heifers had 9% greater (P < 0.01) meal duration, and consumed meals that were 22% longer (P < 0.001) and 17% larger (P < 0.001) compared to excitable heifers. Calm heifers had 12% more (P < 0.001) BV events per meal then excitable heifers. Carcasses from calm heifers were 4% heavier (P < 0.05) and had 7% greater (P = 0.05) backfat (BF) depth and tended to have 4% greater (P = 0.07) USDA YG than carcasses from excitable heifers. Additionally, loin steaks from calm heifers had 8% lower (P < 0.05) WBS force than steaks from excitable heifers. Based on a carcass grid with discounts and premiums for HCW, QG, YG, and tenderness, calm heifers returned $62 more (P < 0.01) revenue per animal than excitable heifers. These results demonstrate that heifers with divergent phenotypes for temperament on feedlot arrival differ in their performance, feed efficiency, and feeding behavior patterns, as well as carcass quality and revenue.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef heifers; carcass traits; feed efficiency; feeding behavior; temperament; tenderness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30689930      PMCID: PMC6447274          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness.

Authors:  M F Miller; M A Carr; C B Ramsey; K L Crockett; L C Hoover
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.

Authors:  J J Crowley; M McGee; D A Kenny; D H Crews; R D Evans; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Validation of a system for monitoring feeding behavior in beef cattle.

Authors:  E D M Mendes; G E Carstens; L O Tedeschi; W E Pinchak; T H Friend
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits.

Authors:  L M Cafe; D L Robinson; D M Ferguson; B L McIntyre; G H Geesink; P L Greenwood
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Technical note: Exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls.

Authors:  K O Curley; J C Paschal; T H Welsh; R D Randel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Associations between response to handling and growth and meat quality in frequently handled Bos taurus beef cattle.

Authors:  S P Turner; E A Navajas; J J Hyslop; D W Ross; R I Richardson; N Prieto; M Bell; M C Jack; R Roehe
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; J A Basarab; M A Price; E K Okine; A Ammoura; S Guercio; C Hansen; C Li; B Benkel; B Murdoch; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; D H Crews; J A Basarab; M A Price; E K Okine; Z Wang; C Li; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of breed composition on phenotypic residual feed intake and growth in Angus, Brahman, and Angus x Brahman crossbred cattle.

Authors:  M A Elzo; D G Riley; G R Hansen; D D Johnson; R O Myer; S W Coleman; C C Chase; J G Wasdin; J D Driver
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Relationship of various incoming cattle traits with feedlot performance and carcass traits.

Authors:  C D Reinhardt; W D Busby; L R Corah
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential haptoglobin responsiveness to a Mannheimia haemolytica challenge altered immunologic, physiologic, and behavior responses in beef steers.

Authors:  Lauren R Wottlin; Gordon E Carstens; William C Kayser; William E Pinchak; Jennifer M Thomson; Valerie Copié; Galen P O'Shea-Stone
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Efficacy of statistical process control procedures to identify deviations in continuously measured physiologic and behavioral variables in beef steers experimentally challenged with Mannheimia haemolytica.

Authors:  William C Kayser; Gordon E Carstens; Ira L Parsons; Kevin E Washburn; Sara D Lawhon; William E Pinchak; Eric Chevaux; Andrew L Skidmore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Differential haptoglobin responsiveness to a Mannheimia haemolytica challenge altered immunologic, physiologic, and behavior responses in beef steers.

Authors:  Lauren R Wottlin; Gordon E Carstens; William C Kayser; William E Pinchak; Jennifer M Thomson; Valerie Copié; Galen P O'Shea-Stone
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  The Effect of Stress on Reproduction and Reproductive Technologies in Beef Cattle-A Review.

Authors:  Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Sonia S Pérez-Garnelo; Arantxa Villagrá; Natividad Pérez-Villalobos; Susana Astiz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effect of Different Finishing Strategies and Steer Temperament on Animal Welfare and Instrumental Meat Tenderness.

Authors:  Marcia Del Campo; Xavier Manteca; Juan Manuel Soares de Lima; Gustavo Brito; Pilar Hernández; Carlos Sañudo; Fabio Montossi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.