Literature DB >> 11811460

Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness.

M F Miller1, M A Carr, C B Ramsey, K L Crockett, L C Hoover.   

Abstract

In the present study, a national consumer evaluation was conducted for beef tenderness on USDA Select strip loin steaks of known Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) force values, ranging from tough (> 5.7 kg) to tender (< 3.0 kg), and to assess the monetary value that consumers place on tenderness by determining the average price a consumer would pay for a steak in three tenderness categories. Three supermarkets in each of five metropolitan areas (Baltimore, MD/Washington D.C.; Chicago, IL; Dallas/Fort Worth, TX; Los Angeles, CA; and Lubbock, TX) were selected to represent a wide range of income, education, and ethnicity at each city. Five trained research teams traveled to the cities to collect data during the same 10-d period. Consumers (n = 734; minimum of 15 consumers/panel, three panels/store, three stores/city, five cities) were asked to evaluate samples from each tenderness classification (tender, intermediate, or tough) for overall and tenderness acceptability, overall quality, beef flavor, juiciness, tenderness, how much they would pay for the steak ($17.14, 14.28, or 10.98/kg), if they would pay more than current market price if guaranteed tender, and to estimate the number of meals in a 2-wk period that included beef. The consumers were 52% light beef users, consuming 0 to 8 meals containing beef in 2 wk, 41% heavy beef users (greater than 12 meals/2 wk), and 6% moderate beef users (9 to 12 meals/2 wk). Consumer tenderness acceptability increased as WBS values decreased (P < 0.05). The transition in consumer perception from tender to tough beef occurred between 4.3 and 4.9 kg of WBS based on > or = 86% consumer acceptability. Consumer acceptability for tenderness decreased from 86% at 4.3 kg for a "slightly tender" rating to 59% at 4.9 kg for a "slightly tough" rating. Data from the present study suggested that consumer WBS tenderness values of < 3.0, 3.4, 4.0, 4.3, and > 4.9 kg would result in 100, 99, 94, 86, and 25% customer satisfaction for beef tenderness, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of the consumers would purchase steaks if the retailer guaranteed them to be tender. The retail steak value differences found in this study would result in the opportunity for a premium to be paid for a guaranteed tender (< 3.0 kg WBS value) carcass of $76.26 vs the toughest (> 5.7 kg) classification. A premium of $66.96 could be paid to the tender classification carcasses vs the tough (> 4.9 kg) classification carcasses, and a premium of $36.58 could be paid for the tender classification carcasses vs the intermediate (> 3.0 to < 4.6 kg) classification carcasses. Results from the present study show that consumers can segregate differences in beef tenderness and that consumers are willing to pay more for more-tender beef.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11811460     DOI: 10.2527/2001.79123062x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  43 in total

1.  Effect of carcass fat and conformation class on consumer perception of various grilled beef muscles.

Authors:  Dominika Guzek; Dominika Głąbska; Krystyna Gutkowska; Agnieszka Wierzbicka
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Feeding distillers grains to cattle may affect beef tenderness early postmortem.

Authors:  Felipe A Ribeiro; Katherine I Domenech-Pérez; Carmen J Contreras-Castillo; Kellen Hart; Nicolas J Herrera; Chris R Calkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effects of ultimate pH and color on sensory traits of pork loin chops cooked to a medium-rare degree of doneness.

Authors:  Elaine Lee Richardson; Brandon Fields; Anna C Dilger; Dustin Dee Boler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Palatability of beef chuck, loin, and round muscles from three USDA quality grades.

Authors:  Kara M Nyquist; Travis G O'Quinn; Lindsey N Drey; Loni W Lucherk; J C Brooks; Mark F Miller; Jerrad F Legako
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Physical, chemical and sensorial parameters for lambs of different groups, slaughtered at different weights.

Authors:  Aline Vieira Landim; Marlos Castanheira; Maria Clorinda Soares Fioravanti; Aline Pacheco; Maximiliano Tadeu Memória Cardoso; Helder Louvandini; Concepta McManus
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Effect of Brahman genetics on myofibrillar protein degradation, collagen crosslinking, and tenderness of the longissimus lumborum.

Authors:  K J Phelps; D D Johnson; M A Elzo; C B Paulk; J M Gonzalez
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Wet bone-in ageing and effect on beef quality technological parameters.

Authors:  Francesca Crivelli; Erica Tirloni; Cristian Bernardi; Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi; Simone Stella
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.701

8.  Efficacy of reverse micellar extracted fruit bromelain in meat tenderization.

Authors:  Ram Saran Chaurasiya; P Z Sakhare; N Bhaskar; H Umesh Hebbar
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.701

9.  Influence of vacuum-ageing duration of whole beef on retail shelf life of steaks packaged with oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) active film under high O2.

Authors:  Djamel Djenane; José Antonio Beltrán; Javier Camo; Pedro Roncalés
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 2.701

10.  Effects of temperament at feedlot arrival and breed type on growth efficiency, feeding behavior, and carcass value in finishing heifers.

Authors:  Cameron A Olson; Gordon E Carstens; Andy D Herring; Daniel S Hale; William C Kayser; Rhonda K Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.