Literature DB >> 17032804

Technical note: Exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls.

K O Curley1, J C Paschal, T H Welsh, R D Randel.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) to compare temperament assessments, using multiple techniques and over repeated observations, to gauge temperament over the long-term and 2) to evaluate the relationship of the temperament appraisals with serum concentrations of cortisol (CS). Measures of temperament were gathered over 3 repeated observations (60-d interval) of yearling, fall-born Brahman bulls (initial BW = 320 +/- 4 kg; n = 66). Temperament assessments included exit velocity (EV), which was the rate at which the bulls exited the squeeze chute and traversed a fixed distance (1.83 m); pen scores (PEN; 1 = quiet to 5 = excited), ascertained from animal behavior while penned in small groups (n = 5); and chute scores (CHUTE; 1 = quiet to 5 = excited), determined from behavioral responses to restraint on the weigh scale. Temperament measures obtained during the initial data collection (d 0) were all positively correlated (r > or = 0.35, P < 0.005) with one another. Additionally, PEN (r = 0.29, P < 0.05) and EV (r = 0.26, P < 0.05) were positively correlated with CS, whereas CHUTE was not (r = 0.09, P = 0.46). All serial EV measures were positively correlated (r > 0.31, P < 0.02). All PEN were positively correlated (r > 0.31, P < 0.01), whereas serial measures of CHUTE were not (P > 0.3). Exit velocity was positively correlated with CS within d 0 (r = 0.26, P = 0.04) and 120 (r = 0.44, P < 0.01). The EV data obtained at d 0 were transformed into a discrete variable, EV ranking (EV RANK; 1 to 3 scale), in which 1 equated to <1 SD below the mean and 3 equated to >1 SD above the mean. Mean EV (P < 0.01) decreased from d 0 (2.82 +/- 0.07 m/sec) to 120 (2.11 +/- 0.10 m/sec). Time also influenced (P < 0.01) CS; mean CS decreased between d 0 (14.6 +/- 0.7 ng/mL) and 120 (11.1 +/- 0.8 ng/mL). Measures of EV can be a valuable tool for the assessment of cattle temperament and a possible predictor of temperament and stress responsiveness to future animal handling events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032804     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

1.  Differential haptoglobin responsiveness to a Mannheimia haemolytica challenge altered immunologic, physiologic, and behavior responses in beef steers.

Authors:  Lauren R Wottlin; Gordon E Carstens; William C Kayser; William E Pinchak; Jennifer M Thomson; Valerie Copié; Galen P O'Shea-Stone
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Evaluation of tropically adapted straightbred and crossbred beef cattle: Cortisol concentration and measures of temperament at weaning and transport.

Authors:  C C Chase; R D Randel; D G Riley; S W Coleman; W A Phillips
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Influence of prenatal transportation stress-induced differential DNA methylation on the physiological control of behavior and stress response in suckling Brahman bull calves.

Authors:  Brittni P Littlejohn; Deborah M Price; Don A Neuendorff; Jeffery A Carroll; Rhonda C Vann; Penny K Riggs; David G Riley; Charles R Long; Ronald D Randel; Thomas H Welsh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Feed efficiency of tropically adapted cattle when fed in winter or spring in a temperate location.

Authors:  Sam W Coleman; Chad C Chase; William A Phillips; David Greg Riley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Temperament influences mitochondrial capacity in skeletal muscle from 8 through 18 mo of age in Brahman heifers.

Authors:  Randi N Owen; Christine M Latham; Charles R Long; Ronald D Randel; Thomas H Welsh; Sarah H White-Springer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of temperament at feedlot arrival and breed type on growth efficiency, feeding behavior, and carcass value in finishing heifers.

Authors:  Cameron A Olson; Gordon E Carstens; Andy D Herring; Daniel S Hale; William C Kayser; Rhonda K Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Differential haptoglobin responsiveness to a Mannheimia haemolytica challenge altered immunologic, physiologic, and behavior responses in beef steers.

Authors:  Lauren R Wottlin; Gordon E Carstens; William C Kayser; William E Pinchak; Jennifer M Thomson; Valerie Copié; Galen P O'Shea-Stone
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Temperament type specific metabolite profiles of the prefrontal cortex and serum in cattle.

Authors:  Bodo Brand; Frieder Hadlich; Bettina Brandt; Nicolas Schauer; Katharina L Graunke; Jan Langbein; Dirk Repsilber; Siriluk Ponsuksili; Manfred Schwerin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of Finishing Diet and Lairage Time on Steers Welfare in Uruguay.

Authors:  Marcia Del Campo Gigena; Juan Manuel Soares de Lima; Gustavo Brito; Xavier Manteca; Pilar Hernández; Fabio Montossi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Forage and breed effects on behavior and temperament of pregnant beef heifers.

Authors:  Angela R Mays; Michael L Looper; Benjamin C Williamson; Kenneth P Coffey; Wayne K Coblentz; Glen E Aiken; Charles F Rosenkrans
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.