LiQiang Su1, JinMei Fu2, ShunLi Sun2, GuangGao Zhao3, Wei Cheng4, ChuanChuan Dou5, MingHui Quan6. 1. School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. 2. Jiangxi Research Institute of Sports Science, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. 3. Department of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. 4. Department of Endocrinology, Yangpu Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China. 5. College of Humanities, Jiang Xi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. 6. School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adults with overweight and obesity. METHODS: Twenty-two articles were included by searching six databases, the total number of subjects was 620 in these articles. Outcomes were synthesised using a random-effects meta-analysis of the Standardized mean difference (SMD) in CVD risk factors. RESULTS: HIIT and MICT resulted in statistically significant reductions in Weight, BMI, fat%, total cholesterol(TC), and improvement in VO2max. Compared with MICT, subgroup of durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.444, 95% CI:0.037~0.851,P = 0.032), subgroup of energy expenditure of HIIT equal to MICT can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.399, 95% CI:0.106~0.692,P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HIIT appears to provide similar benefits to MICT for improving body composition, VO2maxand TC, but HIIT spent less time than MICT by 9.7 min on one session. HIIT is superior to MICT in improving cardiopulmonary fitness when durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min or energy expenditure of HIIT same as MICT. PROSPERO ID: CRD42016045835.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adults with overweight and obesity. METHODS: Twenty-two articles were included by searching six databases, the total number of subjects was 620 in these articles. Outcomes were synthesised using a random-effects meta-analysis of the Standardized mean difference (SMD) in CVD risk factors. RESULTS: HIIT and MICT resulted in statistically significant reductions in Weight, BMI, fat%, total cholesterol(TC), and improvement in VO2max. Compared with MICT, subgroup of durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.444, 95% CI:0.037~0.851,P = 0.032), subgroup of energy expenditure of HIIT equal to MICT can significantly increase VO2max (SMD = 0.399, 95% CI:0.106~0.692,P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HIIT appears to provide similar benefits to MICT for improving body composition, VO2maxand TC, but HIIT spent less time than MICT by 9.7 min on one session. HIIT is superior to MICT in improving cardiopulmonary fitness when durations of HIIT training interval ≥2 min or energy expenditure of HIIT same as MICT. PROSPERO ID: CRD42016045835.
Authors: Romeo B Batacan; Mitch J Duncan; Vincent J Dalbo; Patrick S Tucker; Andrew S Fenning Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Jonathan P Little; Mary E Jung; Amy E Wright; Wendi Wright; Ralph J F Manders Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Martin J Gibala; Jonathan P Little; Martin van Essen; Geoffrey P Wilkin; Kirsten A Burgomaster; Adeel Safdar; Sandeep Raha; Mark A Tarnopolsky Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-07-06 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Arnt Erik Tjønna; Sang Jun Lee; Øivind Rognmo; Tomas O Stølen; Anja Bye; Per Magnus Haram; Jan Pål Loennechen; Qusai Y Al-Share; Eirik Skogvoll; Stig A Slørdahl; Ole J Kemi; Sonia M Najjar; Ulrik Wisløff Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jaime Gallo-Villegas; Leonardo A Castro-Valencia; Laura Pérez; Daniel Restrepo; Oscar Guerrero; Sergio Cardona; Yeliana L Sánchez; Manuela Yepes-Calderón; Luis H Valbuena; Miguel Peña; Andrés F Milán; Maria C Trillos-Almanza; Sergio Granados; Juan C Aristizabal; Mauricio Estrada-Castrillón; Raúl Narvaez-Sanchez; Jorge Osorio; Daniel C Aguirre-Acevedo; Juan C Calderón Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Michael J Kirton; Mitchel T Burnley; Joyce S Ramos; Ryan Weatherwax; Lance C Dalleck Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.017
Authors: Danilo A Massini; Flávio H Nedog; Thiago P de Oliveira; Tiago A F Almeida; Caroline A A Santana; Cassiano M Neiva; Anderson G Macedo; Eliane A Castro; Mário C Espada; Fernando J Santos; Dalton M Pessôa Filho Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-06-17
Authors: Andrea D'Amuri; Juana Maria Sanz; Eleonora Capatti; Francesca Di Vece; Filippo Vaccari; Stefano Lazzer; Giovanni Zuliani; Edoardo Dalla Nora; Angelina Passaro Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2021-07-20