INTRODUCTION:High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient strategy shown to induce various cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations. Little is known about the optimal tolerable combination of intensity and volume necessary for adaptations, especially in clinical populations. OBJECTIVES: In a randomized controlled pilot design, we evaluated the effects of two types of interval training protocols, varying in intensity and interval duration, on clinical outcomes in overweight/obese men. METHODS:Twenty-five men [body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg · m(2)] completed baseline body composition measures: fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM) and percent body fat (%BF) and fasting blood glucose, lipids and insulin (IN). A graded exercise cycling test was completed for peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and power output (PO). Participants were randomly assigned to high-intensity short interval (1MIN-HIIT), high-intensity interval (2MIN-HIIT) or control groups. 1MIN-HIIT and 2MIN-HIIT completed 3 weeks of cycling interval training, 3 days/week, consisting of either 10 × 1 min bouts at 90% PO with 1 min rests (1MIN-HIIT) or 5 × 2 min bouts with 1 min rests at undulating intensities (80%-100%) (2MIN-HIIT). RESULTS: There were no significant training effects on FM (Δ1.06 ± 1.25 kg) or %BF (Δ1.13% ± 1.88%), compared to CON. Increases in LM were not significant but increased by 1.7 kg and 2.1 kg for 1MIN and 2MIN-HIIT groups, respectively. Increases in VO2peak were also not significant for 1MIN (3.4 ml·kg(-1) · min(-1)) or 2MIN groups (2.7 ml · kg(-1) · min(-1)). IN sensitivity (HOMA-IR) improved for both training groups (Δ-2.78 ± 3.48 units; p < 0.05) compared to CON. CONCLUSION: HIIT may be an effective short-term strategy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and IN sensitivity in overweight males.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient strategy shown to induce various cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations. Little is known about the optimal tolerable combination of intensity and volume necessary for adaptations, especially in clinical populations. OBJECTIVES:In a randomized controlled pilot design, we evaluated the effects of two types of interval training protocols, varying in intensity and interval duration, on clinical outcomes in overweight/obesemen. METHODS: Twenty-five men [body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg · m(2)] completed baseline body composition measures: fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM) and percent body fat (%BF) and fasting blood glucose, lipids and insulin (IN). A graded exercise cycling test was completed for peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and power output (PO). Participants were randomly assigned to high-intensity short interval (1MIN-HIIT), high-intensity interval (2MIN-HIIT) or control groups. 1MIN-HIIT and 2MIN-HIIT completed 3 weeks of cycling interval training, 3 days/week, consisting of either 10 × 1 min bouts at 90% PO with 1 min rests (1MIN-HIIT) or 5 × 2 min bouts with 1 min rests at undulating intensities (80%-100%) (2MIN-HIIT). RESULTS: There were no significant training effects on FM (Δ1.06 ± 1.25 kg) or %BF (Δ1.13% ± 1.88%), compared to CON. Increases in LM were not significant but increased by 1.7 kg and 2.1 kg for 1MIN and 2MIN-HIIT groups, respectively. Increases in VO2peak were also not significant for 1MIN (3.4 ml·kg(-1) · min(-1)) or 2MIN groups (2.7 ml · kg(-1) · min(-1)). IN sensitivity (HOMA-IR) improved for both training groups (Δ-2.78 ± 3.48 units; p < 0.05) compared to CON. CONCLUSION: HIIT may be an effective short-term strategy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and IN sensitivity in overweight males.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exercise; VO2peak; body weight; insulin; lifestyle; metabolism; percent body fat
Authors: J R Skleryk; L G Karagounis; J A Hawley; M J Sharman; P B Laursen; G Watson Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Jonathan P Little; Jenna B Gillen; Michael E Percival; Adeel Safdar; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Zubin Punthakee; Mary E Jung; Martin J Gibala Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-08-25
Authors: Jennifer C Richards; Tyler K Johnson; Jessica N Kuzma; Mark C Lonac; Melani M Schweder; Wyatt F Voyles; Christopher Bell Journal: J Physiol Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Lauren E Skelly; Patricia C Andrews; Jenna B Gillen; Brian J Martin; Michael E Percival; Martin J Gibala Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Kyuwan Lee; Irene Kang; Wendy J Mack; Joanne Mortimer; Fred Sattler; George Salem; Janice Lu; Christina M Dieli-Conwright Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ricardo Borges Viana; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Carlos Alexandre Vieira; Paulo Gentil Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Katie R Hirsch; Casey E Greenwalt; Hannah E Cabre; Lacey M Gould; Gabrielle J Brewer; Malia N M Blue; Arny A Ferrando; Kim M Huffman; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Eric D Ryan; Abbie E Smith-Ryan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Mark A Weaver; Anthony J Viera; Morris Weinberger; Malia N M Blue; Katie R Hirsch Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2021-07-16