Literature DB >> 36157386

The Effects of Standardised versus Individualised Aerobic Exercise Prescription on Fitness-Fatness Index in Sedentary Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Michael J Kirton1, Mitchel T Burnley1, Joyce S Ramos1, Ryan Weatherwax2, Lance C Dalleck3.   

Abstract

A poor Fitness Fatness Index (FFI) is associated with type 2 diabetes incidence, other chronic conditions (Alzheimer's, cancer, and cardiovascular disease) and all-cause mortality. Recent investigations have proposed that an individualised exercise prescription based on ventilatory thresholds is more effective than a standardised prescription in improving cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a key mediator of FFI. Thus, the aim of the current study was to determine the effectiveness of individualised versus standardised exercise prescription on FFI in sedentary adults. Thirty-eight sedentary individuals were randomised to 12-weeks of: (1) individualised exercise training using ventilatory thresholds (n = 19) or (2) standardised exercise training using a percentage of heart rate reserve (n = 19). A convenience sample was also recruited as a control group (n=8). Participants completed CRF exercise training three days per week, for 12-weeks on a motorised treadmill. FFI was calculated as CRF in metabolic equivalents (METs), divided by fatness determined by waist to height ratio (WtHR). A graded exercise test was used to measure CRF, and anthropometric measures (height and waist circumference) were assessed to ascertain WtHR. There was a difference in FFI change between study groups, whilst controlling for baseline FFI, F (2, 42) = 19.382 p < .001, partial η2 = 0.480. The magnitude of FFI increase from baseline was significantly higher in the individualised (+15%) compared to the standardised (+10%) (p = 0.028) and control group (+4%) (p = <.001). The main finding of the present study is that individualised exercise prescription had the greatest effect on improving FFI in sedentary adults compared to a standardised prescription. Therefore, an individualised based exercise prescription should be considered a viable and practical method of improving FFI in sedentary adults. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HRR; Ventilatory threshold; central obesity; epidemiology; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36157386      PMCID: PMC9459763          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   4.017


  37 in total

1.  Differences in adaptations to 1 year of aerobic endurance training: individual patterns of nonresponse.

Authors:  F Scharhag-Rosenberger; S Walitzek; W Kindermann; T Meyer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Magnitude and time course of changes in maximal oxygen uptake in response to distinct regimens of chronic interval training in sedentary women.

Authors:  Todd A Astorino; Matthew M Schubert; Elyse Palumbo; Douglas Stirling; David W McMillan; Christina Cooper; Jackie Godinez; Donovan Martinez; Rachael Gallant
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of high-intensity exercise training on body composition, abdominal fat loss, and cardiorespiratory fitness in middle-aged Korean females.

Authors:  Man-Gyoon Lee; Kyung-Shin Park; Do-Ung Kim; Soon-Mi Choi; Hyoung-Jun Kim
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.665

4.  Low Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is a Risk Factor for Death: Exercise Intervention May Lower Mortality?

Authors:  Jari A Laukkanen; Urho M Kujala
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Fitness Fatness Index and Alzheimer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Emily Frith; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.487

6.  High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training.

Authors:  Theresa N Mann; Robert P Lamberts; Michael I Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Predictive Validity of a Fitness Fatness Index in Predicting Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.

Authors:  Meghan K Edwards; Ovuokerie Addoh; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Fitness vs. fatness on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vaughn W Barry; Meghan Baruth; Michael W Beets; J Larry Durstine; Jihong Liu; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 9.  High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in the Prevention/Management of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Syed R Hussain; Andrea Macaluso; Stephen J Pearson
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  The prevalence of adverse cardiometabolic responses to exercise training with evidence-based practice is low.

Authors:  Lance C Dalleck; Gary P Van Guilder; Tara B Richardson; Chantal A Vella
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.