Literature DB >> 30688756

Assessing Fine-Grained Speech Discrimination in Young Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Zhao Ellen Peng1, Christi Hess, Jenny R Saffran, Jan R Edwards, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Children of 2 to 3 years old with cochlear implants can perform consonant discriminations using fine-grained acoustic cues.
BACKGROUND: Children born with severe-to-profound deafness are provided with early cochlear implantation (<2 yr) to maximize oral communication outcomes. Little is known regarding their abilities to discriminate consonant contrasts for accurately identifying speech sounds.
METHODS: Using a Reaching for Sound paradigm to collect behavioral responses, consonant contrast discrimination was measured in 13 children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs; aged 28-37 mo), and 13 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) children. Four contrast pairs were tested: 1) place + voicing, 2) place, 3) voicing, and 4) reduced voice-onset-time cue. Using standard processing strategies, electrodograms showing pulsatile stimulation patterns were created retrospectively to assess the spectral-temporal cues delivered through the clinical speech processors.
RESULTS: As a group, children with BiCIs were able to discriminate all consonant contrasts at a level that was above chance, but their performance was poorer than NH children. Larger individual variability in discrimination performance was found in children with BiCIs. Stepwise regression revealed that, in the place contrast, chronological age was correlated with improved discrimination performance among children with BiCIs.
CONCLUSION: Children with BiCIs were able to discriminate consonant contrasts using fine-grained spectral-temporal cues above chance level but more poorly than their NH peers. Electrodogram analysis confirmed the access to spectral-temporal cues in the consonant contrasts through clinical speech processors. However, the cue saliency might not have be enough for children with BiCIs to achieve the same discrimination accuracy as NH children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30688756      PMCID: PMC6420493          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  19 in total

1.  Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcel R Giezen; Paola Escudero; Anne Baker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Cochlear implants: the view from the brain.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Julie Arenberg Bierer; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.

Authors:  P J Blamey; J Z Sarant; L E Paatsch; J G Barry; C P Bow; R J Wales; M Wright; C Psarros; K Rattigan; R Tooher
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amanda Caldwell; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John K Niparko; Emily A Tobey; Donna J Thal; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Nancy E Fink
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  G M O'Donoghue; T P Nikolopoulos; S M Archbold; M Tait
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob Oleson; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst; J Bruce Tomblin; Haihong Ji; Karen I Kirk; Bob McMurray; Marlan Hanson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reaching for sound measures: an ecologically valid estimate of spatial hearing in 2- to 3-year-old children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Erica Ehlers; Christi Hess; Samantha Harris
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants.

Authors:  R E Eilers; W R Wilson; J M Moore
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Danielle M Bentley; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.