Yoshiaki Abe1, Kentaro Narita2, Hiroki Kobayashi2, Akihiro Kitadate2, Daisuke Miura2, Masami Takeuchi2, Eri O'uchi3, Toshihiro O'uchi3, Kosei Matsue2. 1. Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Centre, 929 Higashi-chou, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan. yoshiakiabe1018@gmail.com. 2. Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Centre, 929 Higashi-chou, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Kameda Medical Centre, Kamogawa, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and clonal circulating plasma cell (CPC) quantification are emerging tools for multiple myeloma (MM) prognostication that have been validated in recent studies. This study investigated the value of PET/CT coupled with CPC quantification for MM prognostication that may contribute to future risk-adapted treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prognostic relevance of a combination of pretreatment PET/CT findings and CPC levels in 163 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM receiving novel agents during induction therapies. RESULTS: High-risk PET/CT findings and elevated CPC levels were defined by the presence of >3 focal lesions with or without extramedullary disease and CPCs ≥0.10% of the total mononuclear cells evaluated, respectively. Subsequently, patients were divided into three groups: PET-CPC stage I included patients with no high-risk PET/CT findings and low CPC levels; stage III included patients with high-risk PET/CT findings and high CPC levels; and stage II included the remaining patients. The three groups of patients differed significantly in terms of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median PFS: not reached [NR] and 36.4 and 15.9 months, and median OS: NR, NR, and 40.4 months for stages I, II, and III, respectively; P < 0.001 for both PFS and OS). This system discriminated both PFS and OS even among younger (age < 75 years) or older (≥ 75 years) patients, patients with Revised International Staging System stage II or III, and patients with or without high-risk cytogenetic characteristics. In the multivariate analysis, the PET-CPC staging system remained prognostic for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: The PET-CPC staging system predicted survival outcomes independently of established risk factors in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment combined with CPC quantification may improve the prognostication of MM and facilitate the development of novel risk-adapted approaches for MM.
PURPOSE: Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and clonal circulating plasma cell (CPC) quantification are emerging tools for multiple myeloma (MM) prognostication that have been validated in recent studies. This study investigated the value of PET/CT coupled with CPC quantification for MM prognostication that may contribute to future risk-adapted treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prognostic relevance of a combination of pretreatment PET/CT findings and CPC levels in 163 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM receiving novel agents during induction therapies. RESULTS: High-risk PET/CT findings and elevated CPC levels were defined by the presence of >3 focal lesions with or without extramedullary disease and CPCs ≥0.10% of the total mononuclear cells evaluated, respectively. Subsequently, patients were divided into three groups: PET-CPC stage I included patients with no high-risk PET/CT findings and low CPC levels; stage III included patients with high-risk PET/CT findings and high CPC levels; and stage II included the remaining patients. The three groups of patients differed significantly in terms of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median PFS: not reached [NR] and 36.4 and 15.9 months, and median OS: NR, NR, and 40.4 months for stages I, II, and III, respectively; P < 0.001 for both PFS and OS). This system discriminated both PFS and OS even among younger (age < 75 years) or older (≥ 75 years) patients, patients with Revised International Staging System stage II or III, and patients with or without high-risk cytogenetic characteristics. In the multivariate analysis, the PET-CPC staging system remained prognostic for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: The PET-CPC staging system predicted survival outcomes independently of established risk factors in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment combined with CPC quantification may improve the prognostication of MM and facilitate the development of novel risk-adapted approaches for MM.
Authors: Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Thomas E Witzig; David Dingli; Michal J Tracz; Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Angela Dispenzieri; Philip R Greipp; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar Journal: Blood Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: F M Ross; A H Ibrahim; A Vilain-Holmes; M O Winfield; L Chiecchio; R K M Protheroe; P Strike; J L Gunasekera; A Jones; C J Harrison; G J Morgan; N C P Cross Journal: Leukemia Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: David Dingli; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philip R Greipp; Mark R Litzow; Dennis A Gastineau; Thomas E Witzig; Morie A Gertz Journal: Blood Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ambuj Kumar; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Axel Glasmacher; Benjamin Djulbegovic Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Elaine M Hurt; Adrian Wiestner; Andreas Rosenwald; A L Shaffer; Elias Campo; Tom Grogan; P Leif Bergsagel; W Michael Kuehl; Louis M Staudt Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Josh Lauring; Abde M Abukhdeir; Hiroyuki Konishi; Joseph P Garay; John P Gustin; Qiuju Wang; Robert J Arceci; William Matsui; Ben Ho Park Journal: Blood Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: María A Vasco-Mogorrón; José A Campillo; Adela Periago; Valentin Cabañas; Mercedes Berenguer; María C García-Garay; Lourdes Gimeno; María F Soto-Ramírez; María D Martínez-Hernández; Manuel Muro; Alfredo Minguela Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 6.166