Literature DB >> 17485707

Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study.

Michele Cavo1, Patrizia Tosi, Elena Zamagni, Claudia Cellini, Paola Tacchetti, Francesca Patriarca, Francesco Di Raimondo, Ettore Volpe, Sonia Ronconi, Delia Cangini, Franco Narni, Affra Carubelli, Luciano Masini, Lucio Catalano, Mauro Fiacchini, Antonio de Vivo, Alessandro Gozzetti, Antonio Lazzaro, Sante Tura, Michele Baccarani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective, randomized study of single (arm A) versus double (arm B) autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 321 patients were enrolled onto the study and were randomly assigned to receive either a single course of high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 (arm A) or melphalan at 200 mg/m2 followed, after 3 to 6 months, by melphalan at 120 mg/m2 and busulfan at 12 mg/kilogram (arm B).
RESULTS: As compared with assignment to the single-transplantation group (n = 163 patients), random assignment to receive double ASCT (n = 158 patients) significantly increased the probability to attain at least a near complete response (nCR; 33% v 47%, respectively; P = .008), prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) duration of 18 months (median, 24 v 42 months, respectively; P < .001), and significantly extended event-free survival (EFS; median, 23 v 35 months, respectively; P = .001). Administration of a second transplantation and of novel agents for treating sequential relapses in up to 50% of patients randomly assigned to receive a single ASCT likely contributed to prolong the survival duration of the whole group, whose 7-year rate (46%) was similar to that of the double-transplantation group (43%; P = .90). Transplantation-related mortality was 3% in arm A and 4% in arm B (P = .70).
CONCLUSION: In comparison with a single ASCT as up-front therapy for newly diagnosed MM, double ASCT effected superior CR or nCR rate, RFS, and EFS, but failed to significantly prolong overall survival. Benefits offered by double ASCT were particularly evident among patients who failed at least nCR after one autotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485707     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  85 in total

1.  Long-Term Follow-up of CALGB (Alliance) 100001: Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah A Holstein; Vera J Suman; Kouros Owzar; Katelyn Santo; Don M Benson; Thomas C Shea; Thomas Martin; Margarida Silverman; Luis Isola; Ravi Vij; Bruce D Cheson; Charles Linker; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; Philip L McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Arsenic trioxide with ascorbic acid and high-dose melphalan: results of a phase II randomized trial.

Authors:  Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Rima M Saliba; Yago Nieto; Gaurav Parikh; Matteo Pelosini; Fatima B Khan; Roy B Jones; Chitra Hosing; Floralyn Mendoza; Donna M Weber; Michael Wang; Uday Popat; Amin Alousi; Paolo Anderlini; Richard E Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  First line vs delayed transplantation in myeloma: Certainties and controversies.

Authors:  Annamaria Brioli
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

4.  Total marrow irradiation: a new ablative regimen as part of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George Somlo; Ricardo Spielberger; Paul Frankel; Chatchada Karanes; Amrita Krishnan; Pablo Parker; Leslie Popplewell; Firoozeh Sahebi; Neil Kogut; David Snyder; An Liu; Timothy Schultheiss; Stephen Forman; Jeffrey Y C Wong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Long-term follow-up of a comparison of nonmyeloablative allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma.

Authors:  Luisa Giaccone; Barry Storer; Francesca Patriarca; Marcello Rotta; Roberto Sorasio; Bernardino Allione; Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca; Moreno Festuccia; Lucia Brunello; Paola Omedè; Sara Bringhen; Massimo Aglietta; Alessandro Levis; Nicola Mordini; Andrea Gallamini; Renato Fanin; Massimo Massaia; Antonio Palumbo; Giovannino Ciccone; Rainer Storb; Ted A Gooley; Mario Boccadoro; Benedetto Bruno
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 8.  The role of pre-transplant induction regimens and autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of novel targeted agents.

Authors:  Francesca Gay; Federica Cavallo; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 10.  Treatment of myeloma: cure vs control.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.