D-dimer/troponin ratio in the differential diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate useful cardiac biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) with troponin elevation from acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
METHODS: A total of 771 consecutive NSTEMI patients with D-dimer measurements and 90 patients with troponin-I (TnI) elevation out of 233 APE patients were enrolled, and cardiac biomarkers were compared.
RESULTS: D-dimer elevation was noted in 382 patients with NSTEMI (49.5%), and TnI elevation was noted 90 out of 233 APE patients (38.6%). Unnecessary coronary angiography was performed in 10 patients (11.1%) among 90 APE patients with TnI elevation. D-dimer was significantly elevated in APE than in NSTEMI (9.9 ± 11.6 mg/L vs. 1.8 ± 4.3 mg/L, p < 0.001), whereas TnI was significantly elevated in NSTEMI (22.4 ± 41.5 ng/mL vs. 0.7 ± 1.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001). D-dimer/TnI ratio was significantly higher in APE than in NSTEMI (50.6 ± 85.3 vs. 1.6 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). On receiver operation characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value for differentiating APE from NSTEMI was 1.12 mg/L for D-dimer (sensitivity 81.1%, specificity 70.2%), 0.72 ng/mL for TnI (sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 78.9%), and 1.82 for D-dimer/TnI ratio (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 86.6%).
CONCLUSION: D-dimer/TnI ratio would be a simple and useful parameter for differentiating APE with cardiac troponin elevation from NSTEMI. Optimal cardiovascular imaging to identify APE should be considered in patients with D-dimer/ TnI ratio > 1.82 before performing coronary angiography to avoid unnecessary invasive procedure.

INTRODUCTION

Acute chest pain and/or dyspnea are frequently encountered clinical symptoms at emergency room, and acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among these patients [1]. To select appropriate therapeutic strategy or to minimize the mortality and morbidity, the prompt and accurate identification of the life-threatening diseases such as APE or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) would be essential. Because substantial numbers of patients with APE present with dyspnea, chest pain, and electrocardiographic changes, as well as elevation of cardiac biomarkers which are quietly mimic for those of ACS [2,3], the differential diagnosis between APE with troponin elevation and ACS without ST elevation on electrocardiography such as acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is often difficult.

Several cardiac biomarkers have been proposed and used for rapid evaluation and differential diagnosis of the patients with acute chest pain or dyspnea at emergency setting [4,5]. D-dimer, a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, is the most useful biomarker in diagnosing or ruling out APE with its proven high sensitivity [2,6-8]. However, many other conditions including acute NSTEMI may result in the elevation of serum D-dimer level, because serum D-dimer level is specific for fibrin, not for APE [9-11]. Cardiac troponins are most useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute NSTEMI, but other life-threatening conditions, such as APE and aortic dissection, may also result in the elevation of troponin levels [12,13]. For these reasons, the differential diagnosis between APE and acute NSTEMI becomes more difficult, and thus unnecessary coronary angiography (CAG) is performed in some cases of APE.

Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate useful cardiac biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of APE from acute NSTEMI and to investigate the incidence of unnecessary CAG in patients with APE.

METHODS

Study design and subjects

The present study is a single center retrospective observational study, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hospital (IRB No. 2015-05-092). The waiver of informed consent is applied for the retrospective analysis study in our institution.

From 2012 to 2013, a total of 233 consecutive patients with APE and 828 patients with acute NSTEMI were identified. After exclusion of 143 patients without troponin-I (TnI) elevation, a total of 90 APE patients (68.2 ± 15.4 years, 29 males) with TnI elevation were enrolled. After exclusion of 57 patients without measurement of D-dimer, a total of 771 patients (66.3 ± 12.9 years, 521 males) with acute NSTEMI were finally enrolled in the present study.

Diagnosis of APE and NSTEMI

APE was confirmed by demonstrating the presence of contrast filling defects in pulmonary arteries on helical computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). CTPA images were obtained with a commercially available helical CT scanner (Sensation Cardiac 64, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany; Light Speed QX/I, GE Medical systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) according to the standardized APE protocol of our institution. The APE protocol requires injection of contrast material at rates of 4 mL/sec, total 70 to 80 mL of contrast agents, a section thickness of 3 mm or less, and the use of bolus tracking software for optimal opacification of pulmonary arteries.

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed according to the consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/World Heart Federation Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction [14]. Acute NSTEMI was defined as acute MI without ST segment elevation on electrocardiography at presentation. Infarct-related arteries were identified using a combination of electrocardiographic findings, left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography, and coronary angiographic findings.

Echocardiographic examination

Echocardiographic examination was performed as soon as possible after diagnosis of APE by CTPA for the risk stratification or clinical decision making of therapeutic strategy. Echocardiographic demonstration of right ventricular (RV) free wall hypokinesia or akinesia in patients with APE was considered as RV dysfunction. RV enlargement, defined by the ratio of RV to LV size more than 1 in apical 4 chamber view without obvious causes, accompanied by pulmonary hypertension in patients with APE was also considered as RV dysfunction in the present study [15].

Measurement of biomarkers

D-dimer, TnI, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured as cardiac biomarkers. D-dimer was measured with immunoturbidimetric assay using CA-7000 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), and the reference value is < 0.5 mg/L. TnI was measured using electrochemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay method using Dimension RxL-Max (Siemens), and the reference value is < 0.05 ng/mL. NT-proBNP was measured using an electrochemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay method for NT-proBNP with an Elecsys 2010 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The analytic range of the NT-proBNP assay extends from 5 to 35,000 pg/mL. The reference value varies according to age and gender, and < 88 pg/mL for men and < 153 pg/mL for women in our institution. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured by the immunoturbidimetric CRP-Latex (II) assay using an Olympus 5431 autoanalyzer (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA) with reference range of < 0.5 mg/dL.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS for Windows version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and percentage for categorical data. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences of categorical values, and independent t test was used to compare the differences of continuous variables between the groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers for differentiating APE from NSTEMI. A p value less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics

Baseline characteristics of the patients with APE and NSTEMI are summarized in Table 1. Female was predominant in APE, whereas male was predominant in acute NSTEMI. Dyspnea was more common presentation in APE, whereas chest pain was more common in acute NSTEMI. Blood pressures were significantly lower and the incidence of hypotension significantly higher in APE than in NSTEMI. Immobilization and previous history of venous thromboembolism were common predisposing conditions in APE, whereas smoking was common in NSTEMI.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical characteristics of the patients

Characteristic	APE (n = 90)	NSTEMI (n = 771)	p value
Age, yr	68.2 ± 15.4	66.3 ± 12.9	0.201
Female sex	61 (67.8)	250 (32.4)	< 0.001
SBP, mmHg	114.4 ± 23.0	126.6 ± 23.5	< 0.001
DBP, mmHg	70.2 ± 15.5	79.1 ± 14.9	< 0.001
Heart rate, beats/min	90.1 ± 17.5	81.2 ± 18.9	< 0.001
Clinical presentation
Dyspnea	65 (72.2)	155 (20.1)	< 0.001
Chest pain	22 (24.4)	602 (78.1)	< 0.001
Hypotension	13 (14.4)	41 (5.3)	0.001
Symptom to ER time, hr	40.2 ± 30.0	21.6 ± 21.4	< 0.001
Predisposing conditions
Hypertension	46 (51.1)	420 (54.5)	0.577
Smoking	20 (22.2)	425 (55.1)	< 0.001
Hypercholesterolemia	16 (17.8)	157 (20.3)	0.562
Diabetes	18 (20.0)	229 (29.7)	0.064
Previous VTE	7 (7.8)	12 (1.6)	< 0.001
Immobilization	30 (33.3)	28 (3.6)	< 0.001
Obesity	19 (21.1)	137 (17.8)	0.436

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

APE, acute pulmonary embolism; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ER, emergency room; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Electrocardiographic findings

Electrocardiographic findings between the groups are summarized in Table 2. Tachycardia, ST elevation in lead aVR, T wave inversion in leads V1-3, and right bundle branch block were more common in APE, whereas ST depression was more common in NSTEMI.

Table 2.

Electrocardiographic findings of the patients

Variable	APE (n = 90)	NSTEMI (n = 771)	p value
HR > 100 beats/min	28 (31.1)	116 (15.1)	< 0.001
Atrial fibrillation	6 (6.7)	40 (5.2)	0.555
ST depression > 1 mm	6 (6.7)	140 (18.2)	0.006
ST elevation > 1 mm in aVR	26 (28.9)	126 (16.3)	0.003
T-wave inversion in V1-3	39 (43.3)	183 (23.7)	< 0.001
Incomplete or complete RBBB	16 (17.8)	57 (7.4)	0.001
LBBB	0	19 (2.5)	0.132

Values are presented as number (%).

APE, acute pulmonary embolism; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; HR, heart rate; RBBB, right bundle branch block; LBBB, left bundle branch block.

Echocardiographic findings

Echocardiographic findings between of the groups are summarized in Table 3. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension were significantly smaller in APE group than in NSTEMI group. LV ejection fraction was significantly lower in NSTEMI group than in APE group. RV systolic pressure was significantly higher and RV dysfunction was significantly prevalent in APE group than in NSTEMI group, whereas LV dysfunction was significantly frequent in NSTEMI group than in APE group.

Table 3.

Echocardiographic findings of the patients

Variable	APE (n = 90)	NSTEMI (n = 771)	p value
LVEDD, mm	42.7 ± 7.0	50.5 ± 6.5	< 0.001
LVESD, mm	27.9 ± 5.8	35.2 ± 11.0	< 0.001
LVEF, %	61.9 ± 10.9	55.0 ± 12.6	< 0.001
E, cm/sec	51.8 ± 15.6	92.4 ± 127.4	< 0.001
A, cm/e	76.5 ± 17.8	111.3 ± 156.1	< 0.001
DT, msec	204.3 ± 100.9	212.5 ± 71.3	0.554
RVSP, mmHg	56.3 ± 17.1	36.7 ± 11.4	< 0.001
RV dysfunction	76 (84.4)	33 (4.3)	< 0.001
LV dysfunction	9 (10.3)	226 (30.5)	< 0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

APE, acute pulmonary embolism; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; E, early diastolic velocity of mitral inflow; A, late diastolic velocity of mitral inflow; DT, deceleration time of mitral inflow; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; RV, right ventricular; LV, left ventricular.

Cardiac biomarkers

The comparisons of cardiac biomarkers between the groups are summarized in Table 4. D-dimer elevation was noted in all patients with APE and in 382 patients with NSTEMI (49.5%). The level of D-dimer was significantly elevated in APE group than in NSTEMI group, whereas cardiac TnI was significantly elevated in NSTEMI group than in APE group. D-dimer/TnI ratio was significantly higher in APE group than in NSTEMI group (Fig. 1). The level of NT-proBNP and hsCRP were not different between the groups.

Table 4.

Cardiac biomarkers of the patients

Variable	APE (n = 90)	NSTEMI (n = 771)	p value
NT-proBNP, pg/mL	4,010.8 ± 4,073.2	3,723.1 ± 9,847.1	0.784
TnI, ng/mL	0.7 ± 1.4	22.4 ± 41.5	< 0.001
D-dimer, mg/L	9.9 ± 11.6	1.8 ± 4.3	< 0.001
D-dimer/TnI ratio	50.6 ± 85.3	1.6 ± 5.7	< 0.001
hsCRP, mg/dL	3.5 ± 4.4	2.1 ± 4.2	0.114

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

APE, acute pulmonary embolism; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-Btype natriuretic peptide; TnI, troponin-I; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Figure 1.

Comparisons of biomarkers between acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). (A) D-dimer, (B) troponin-I, and (C) D-dimer/troponin-I.

ROC curve analysis

ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off value and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating APE from NSTEMI. The optimal cut-off value was 1.12 mg/L for D-dimer (AUC 0.860, sensitivity 81.1%, specificity 70.2%), 0.72 ng/mL for TnI (AUC 0.875, sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 78.9%), and 1.82 for D-dimer/TnI ratio (AUC 0.951, sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 86.6%) (Fig. 2). D-dimer/TnI ratio showed better sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between APE and NSTEMI than either D-dimer or TnI.

Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for differential diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Unnecessary CAG and its clinical impacts

Unnecessary CAG was performed in 10 out of 90 patients with APE (11.1%) because initial clinical diagnosis at emergency room was acute NSTEMI. All of them had RV dysfunction on echocardiography, and four of them were hypotensive at the time of presentation. Thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was applied to six of them and followed by intravenous heparinization. Although all of them recovered from APE and successfully discharged, two of them experienced large puncture site hematoma after the administration of thrombolytic therapy.

In-hospital mortality and biomarkers

During hospitalization, five patients in APE (5.6%) and 25 patients in NSTEMI (3.2%) were died, and in-hospital mortality was not different between the groups (p = 0.258).

Overall, the level of TnI and D-dimer and D-dimer/TnI ratio were not different between the dead and the survived (22.2 ± 42.1 ng/mL vs. 20.0±39.8 ng/mL, p = 0.780; 4.7 ± 8.0 mg/L vs. 2.6 ± 6.0 mg/L, p = 0.056; 5.5 ± 8.3 vs. 6.8 ± 33.3, p = 0.487, respectively). Only the level of NT-proBNP was significantly elevated in the dead than in the survived (8,442.0 ± 10,652.8 pg/mL vs. 3,583.7 ± 9,324.9 pg/mL, p = 0.005).

In APE group, the level of TnI and NT-proBNP were significantly elevated in the dead than in the survived (2.2 ± 2.5 ng/mL vs. 0.6 ± 1.3 ng/mL, p = 0.01; 8,678.4 ± 4,439.0 pg/mL vs. 3,736.3±3,907.4 pg/mL, p = 0.008, respectively), whereas D-dimer/TnI ratio was significantly lower in the dead than in the survived (12.2 ± 11.7 vs. 52.9 ± 87.2, p < 0.001). The level of D-dimer was not different between the dead and the survived (15.9 ± 14.8 vs. 9.6 ± 11.4 mg/L, p = 0.237).

In NSTEMI group, the level of NT-proBNP and D-dimer/TnI ratio were significantly higher in the dead than in the survived (8,394.7 ± 11,568.3 pg/mL vs. 3,566.5 ± 9,754.6 pg/mL, p = 0.016; 4.1 ± 7.0 vs. 1.5 ± 5.6, p = 0.024, respectively). However, the levels of TnI and D-dimer were not different between the dead and the survived (26.2 ± 45.2 ng/mL vs. 22.2 ± 41.4 ng/mL, p = 0.668; 2.5 ± 3.1 mg/L vs. 1.8 ± 4.3 mg/L, p = 0.273, respectively).

DISCUSSION

The authors investigated useful cardiac biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of APE from acute NSTEMI and the incidence of unnecessary CAG in patients with APE, and the results of the present study demonstrated several clinically important findings. Firstly, D-dimer/Tni ratio is a simple, but very sensitive and specific parameter for differentiating APE with troponin elevation from NSTEMI. Secondly, unnecessary CAG is performed not infrequently in patients with APE (11.1%), because acute NSTEMI was the initial clinical diagnosis in patients with chest pain and/or dyspnea and troponin elevation. Thirdly, unnecessary CAG is associated with bleeding complications in patients with APE who require thrombolytic therapy.

Although the prompt diagnosis and adequate therapy is essential in reducing mortality and complications, APE is sometimes misdiagnosed as acute NSTEMI in emergency room because of their similarities in clinical presentation [2,3]. In the present study, 10 out of 90 APE patients were also initially misdiagnosed as acute NSTEMI, and thus unnecessary CAG was performed. All of them had RV dysfunction and four of them were hypotensive, and thus they can be classified as intermediate-high or high risk group of APE. Because in-hospital death is usually developed in first few hours after admission, these misdiagnoses of APE may result in increased mortality even though no deaths were developed in the present study fortunately. Furthermore, unnecessary CAG was associated with bleeding complications after thrombolytic therapy in the present study. Therefore, the authors want to investigate simple biomarker based approach to reduce the misdiagnosis of APE from acute NSTEMI.

The level of D-dimer can be elevated in a wide variety of clinical conditions associated with simultaneous activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and these include inflammation, bleeding, trauma, surgery, and necrosis [3,9-11]. In the present study, 382 patients (49.5%) with acute NSTEMI also showed D-dimer elevation. Because acute NSTEMI is also a condition of acute thrombosis, it is expected that D-dimer level is elevated in patients with acute NSTEMI. For these reasons, the positive predictive value of D-dimer testing is low, and thus D-dimer testing is not useful for the confirm diagnosis of APE [16]. The major clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing is that a normal D-dimer level can usually exclude the possibility of APE because of its high negative predictive value. Despite of low positive predictive value, some studies have suggested that D-dimer testing is useful in the differential diagnosis of APE from acute MI. In the study of Sakamoto et al. [11], D-dimer level > 5.0 g/mL is helpful for differentiating APE from acute MI with acceptable specificity of 90%, but the sensitivity of D-dimer testing was only 68%. The authors also evaluated the usefulness of D-dimer testing in differentiating APE from acute NSTEMI. The optimal cut-off value of D-dimer for differentiating APE from NSTEMI was 1.12 mg/L, and the sensitivity was 81.1%, and specificity was 70.2% in the present study. As in the study of Sakamoto et al. [11], our study also demonstrated that D-dimer testing has limitation in the differential diagnosis of APE from acute NSTEMI because of its low sensitivity.

Cardiac troponins are most useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute MI [12,13], but APE may also results in the elevation of troponin levels, especially in patients with RV dysfunction on imaging study or severe APE [3,17,18]. In the present study, TnI elevation was observed in 90 out of 233 APE patients (38.6%), and TnI elevation in APE was associated with RV dysfunction on echocardiography; RV dysfunction was demonstrated 77 (84.4%) out of 90 APE patients with TnI elevation. Although the role of cardiac troponins in identifying high risk group of APE has been well evaluated, the role of troponin testing in differential diagnosis of APE from acute NSTEMI has never been studied. In the present study, the optimal cut-off value of TnI for differentiating APE from acute NSTEMI of TnI was 0.72 ng/mL. The level of TnI < 0.72 ng/mL usually favors the diagnosis of APE rather than acute NSTEMI with the sensitivity of 80.6% and specificity of 78.9%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which demonstrated the role of troponin testing in the differential diagnosis of APE with troponin elevation from acute NSTEMI.

In the present study, the usefulness of D-dimer/TnI ratio in the differential diagnosis of APE with troponin elevation from acute NSTEMI was firstly evaluated, because the authors hypothesized that the difference of D-dimer/TnI ratio between APE and acute NSTEMI would become much greater than the difference of either D-dimer or TnI alone. D-dimer/TnI ratio was significantly higher in APE than in NSTEMI (50.6 ± 85.3 vs. 1.6 ± 5.7, p < 0.001), and the D-dimer/TnI ratio of > 1.82 can significantly differentiate APE with troponin elevation from acute NSTEMI (AUC 0.951, sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 86.6%). D-dimer/Tni ratio > 1.82 showed better sensitivity and specificity than D-dimer or TnI alone in differentiating APE with troponin elevation from acute NSTEMI. From these results, the authors propose that optimal cardiovascular imaging for the identification of APE should be considered in patients with acute chest pain or dyspnea and D-dimer/TnI ratio > 1.82 before considering acute NSTEMI and performing CAG. This simple approach may avoid the risk of unnecessary invasive procedure.

NT-proBNP is a useful cardiac biomarker for the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea whether it is cardiac or non-cardiac origin [19]. However, the level of NT-proBNP was not different between APE with troponin elevation and acute NSTEMI in the present study. Because both APE with troponin elevation and acute NSTEMI are acutely stressful conditions for heart and natriuretic peptide is released from cardiac myocytes due to hemodynamic stress, the level of NT-proBNP may not be significantly different in both conditions. Although NT-proBNP seemed not to be an useful biomarker in the differential diagnosis of APE from NSTEMI, recent meta-analyses confirmed that NT-proBNP is a useful prognostic marker for APE [20,21].

The present study has several limitations. First, the study was a single-center, retrospective observational study, and thus the present study has all limitations of retrospective study including selection bias. Second, although the blood samplings for cardiac biomarkers were taken as soon as possible after hospitalization, the timing of blood samplings might be different among the patients, and the results of biomarker levels might be affected. Also, the time difference from symptom onset to hospitalization of each patient was not considered in the present study, but it may also affect the results of biomarker level. Third, chest CTA was not performed in patients with acute NSTEMI, and thus the presence of combined APE cannot be excluded.

Despite of these limitations, the result of the present study demonstrated that D-dimer/TnI ratio is a simple, sensitive, and specific parameter for distinguishing APE from NSTEMI. Optimal cardiovascular imaging to identify APE should be considered in patients with acute dyspnea or chest pain and D-dimer/TnI ratio > 1.82 before considering NSTEMI and performing CAG. This simple approach may be helpful in avoiding the risk of unnecessary invasive procedure and also helpful for patients to get optimal treatments without delay. Prospective studies with larger number of subjects will be needed to confirm the results of the present study.

1. Unnecessary coronary angiography (CAG) is not infrequently performed in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) patients with troponin elevation because of clinical similarities with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

2. Unnecessary CAG is associated with bleeding complications in patients with APE who require thrombolytic therapy.

3. The measurement of D-dimer/troponin-I ratio would be a simple and useful parameter for differentiating APE with cardiac troponin elevation from NSTEMI in acute clinical settings and thus would be helpful in avoiding unnecessary CAG.