INTRODUCTION: Acute aortic dissection (AAD), acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are all emergent diseases with acute chest pain. However, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose these diseases by symptoms, ECG changes and/or cardiac biomarkers, especially immediately after onset. Because these diseases are all thrombogenic diseases, we considered that D-dimer could be helpful to differentiate these diseases. The purpose of this research was to define the D-dimer value for discrimination between AAD, PE and AMI. METHODS: Plasma D-dimer values of a consecutive series of 35 AAD, 22 PE and 206 AMI patients on admission were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The D-dimer values of patients with AAD (32.9 ± 66.7 g/ml, p<0.001) and PE (28.5 ± 23.6 g/ ml, p<0.001) were significantly higher than those of AMI patients (2.1 ± 3.7 g/ml). A cutoff value of 5.0 g/ ml was effective in distinguishing AAD and PE from AMI, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the possibility that D-dimer could enable faster diagnosis and treatment of AAD, PE and AMI patients. We expect that the D-dimer test will be used more often for screening patients with possible AAD, PE or AMI in the emergency room. We would recommend contrast computed tomography first, not coronary angiography, in a patient with a D-dimer level higher than 5.0 g/ml using our diagnostic kit.
INTRODUCTION: Acute aortic dissection (AAD), acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are all emergent diseases with acute chest pain. However, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose these diseases by symptoms, ECG changes and/or cardiac biomarkers, especially immediately after onset. Because these diseases are all thrombogenic diseases, we considered that D-dimer could be helpful to differentiate these diseases. The purpose of this research was to define the D-dimer value for discrimination between AAD, PE and AMI. METHODS: Plasma D-dimer values of a consecutive series of 35 AAD, 22 PE and 206 AMI patients on admission were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The D-dimer values of patients with AAD (32.9 ± 66.7 g/ml, p<0.001) and PE (28.5 ± 23.6 g/ ml, p<0.001) were significantly higher than those of AMI patients (2.1 ± 3.7 g/ml). A cutoff value of 5.0 g/ ml was effective in distinguishing AAD and PE from AMI, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the possibility that D-dimer could enable faster diagnosis and treatment of AAD, PE and AMI patients. We expect that the D-dimer test will be used more often for screening patients with possible AAD, PE or AMI in the emergency room. We would recommend contrast computed tomography first, not coronary angiography, in a patient with a D-dimer level higher than 5.0 g/ml using our diagnostic kit.
Authors: Renata da Silva Pereira; Etiane Tatsch; Guilherme Vargas Bochi; Helena Kober; Thiago Duarte; Greice Franciele Feyh dos Santos Montagner; José Edson Paz da Silva; Marta Maria Medeiros Frescura Duarte; Ivana Beatrice Mânica da Cruz; Rafael Noal Moresco Journal: Inflammation Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Jong Yoon Kim; Kye Hun Kim; Jae Yeong Cho; Doo Sun Sim; Hyun Ju Yoon; Nam Sik Yoon; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 2.884