Literature DB >> 30684023

Single and multiple gene knockouts by CRISPR-Cas9 in maize.

Nicolas M Doll1, Laurine M Gilles1,2, Marie-France Gérentes1, Christelle Richard1, Jeremy Just1, Yannick Fierlej1,3, Virginia M G Borrelli4, Ghislaine Gendrot1, Gwyneth C Ingram1, Peter M Rogowsky1, Thomas Widiez5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The analysis of 93 mutant alleles in 18 genes demonstrated that CRISPR-Cas9 is a robust tool for targeted mutagenesis in maize, permitting efficient generation of single and multiple knockouts. CRISPR-Cas9 technology is a simple and efficient tool for targeted mutagenesis of the genome. It has been implemented in many plant species, including crops such as maize. Here we report single- and multiple-gene mutagenesis via stably transformed maize plants. Two different CRISPR-Cas9 vectors were used allowing the expression of multiple guide RNAs and different strategies to knockout either independent or paralogous genes. A total of 12 plasmids, representing 28 different single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), were generated to target 20 genes. For 18 of these genes, at least one mutant allele was obtained, while two genes were recalcitrant to sequence editing. 19% (16/83) of mutant plants showed biallelic mutations. Small insertions or deletions of less than ten nucleotides were most frequently observed, regardless of whether the gene was targeted by one or more sgRNAs. Deletions of defined regions located between the target sites of two guide RNAs were also reported although the exact deletion size was variable. Double and triple mutants were created in a single step, which is especially valuable for functional analysis of genes with strong genetic linkage. Off-target effects were theoretically limited due to rigorous sgRNA design and random experimental checks at three potential off-target sites did not reveal any editing. Sanger chromatograms allowed to unambiguously class the primary transformants; the majority (85%) were fully edited plants transmitting systematically all detected mutations to the next generation, generally following Mendelian segregation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Gene editing; Maize; Mutagenesis; SDN1; Zea mays

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30684023     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-019-02378-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  62 in total

1.  Efficient repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination between directly repeated sequences in the plant genome.

Authors:  Ralph Siebert; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Enhancing gene targeting with designed zinc finger nucleases.

Authors:  Marina Bibikova; Kelly Beumer; Jonathan K Trautman; Dana Carroll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Defective kernel mutants of maize. I. Genetic and lethality studies.

Authors:  M G Neuffer; W F Sheridan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings.

Authors:  Mitch McVey; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases.

Authors:  Matthew H Porteus; Dana Carroll
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Vipula K Shukla; Yannick Doyon; Jeffrey C Miller; Russell C DeKelver; Erica A Moehle; Sarah E Worden; Jon C Mitchell; Nicole L Arnold; Sunita Gopalan; Xiangdong Meng; Vivian M Choi; Jeremy M Rock; Ying-Ying Wu; George E Katibah; Gao Zhifang; David McCaskill; Matthew A Simpson; Beth Blakeslee; Scott A Greenwalt; Holly J Butler; Sarah J Hinkley; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease.

Authors:  Huirong Gao; Jeff Smith; Meizhu Yang; Spencer Jones; Vesna Djukanovic; Michael G Nicholson; Ande West; Dennis Bidney; S Carl Falco; Derek Jantz; L Alexander Lyznik
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize.

Authors:  Yuji Ishida; Yukoh Hiei; Toshihiko Komari
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 9.  The art and design of genetic screens: maize.

Authors:  Héctor Candela; Sarah Hake
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Sequence-indexed mutations in maize using the UniformMu transposon-tagging population.

Authors:  A Mark Settles; David R Holding; Bao Cai Tan; Susan P Latshaw; Juan Liu; Masaharu Suzuki; Li Li; Brent A O'Brien; Diego S Fajardo; Ewa Wroclawska; Chi-Wah Tseung; Jinsheng Lai; Charles T Hunter; Wayne T Avigne; John Baier; Joachim Messing; L Curtis Hannah; Karen E Koch; Philip W Becraft; Brian A Larkins; Donald R McCarty
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  General guidelines for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants.

Authors:  Musa Kavas; Ceyhun Kayihan; Ufuk Demirel; Emre Aksoy; Kubilay Yildirim; Bayram Ali Yerlikaya; Irmak Çalik; İlkay Sevgen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Function Analysis of the PR55/B Gene Related to Self-Incompatibility in Chinese Cabbage Using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Na-Ri Shin; Yun-Hee Shin; Han-Seul Kim; Young-Doo Park
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Transcriptomics at Maize Embryo/Endosperm Interfaces Identifies a Transcriptionally Distinct Endosperm Subdomain Adjacent to the Embryo Scutellum.

Authors:  Nicolas M Doll; Jeremy Just; Véronique Brunaud; José Caïus; Aurélie Grimault; Nathalie Depège-Fargeix; Eddi Esteban; Asher Pasha; Nicholas J Provart; Gwyneth C Ingram; Peter M Rogowsky; Thomas Widiez
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Back to the wild: mining maize (Zea mays L.) disease resistance using advanced breeding tools.

Authors:  Shabir Hussain Wani; Kajal Samantara; Ali Razzaq; Grihalakshmi Kakani; Pardeep Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  PEG-Delivered CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins System for Gene-Editing Screening of Maize Protoplasts.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ribeiro Arnt Sant'Ana; Clarissa Alves Caprestano; Rubens Onofre Nodari; Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Which Factors Affect the Occurrence of Off-Target Effects Caused by the Use of CRISPR/Cas: A Systematic Review in Plants.

Authors:  Dominik Modrzejewski; Frank Hartung; Heike Lehnert; Thorben Sprink; Christian Kohl; Jens Keilwagen; Ralf Wilhelm
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  The Functional Association of ACQOS/VICTR with Salt Stress Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana Was Confirmed by CRISPR-Mediated Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Sang-Tae Kim; Minkyung Choi; Su-Ji Bae; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Improved Transformation and Regeneration of Indica Rice: Disruption of SUB1A as a Test Case via CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Yuya Liang; Sudip Biswas; Backki Kim; Julia Bailey-Serres; Endang M Septiningsih
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Genome editing in cereal crops: an overview.

Authors:  Jerlie Mhay Matres; Julia Hilscher; Akash Datta; Victoria Armario-Nájera; Can Baysal; Wenshu He; Xin Huang; Changfu Zhu; Rana Valizadeh-Kamran; Kurniawan R Trijatmiko; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou; Eva Stoger; Inez H Slamet-Loedin
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Lipid anchoring and electrostatic interactions target NOT-LIKE-DAD to pollen endo-plasma membrane.

Authors:  Laurine M Gilles; Andrea R M Calhau; Veronica La Padula; Nathanaël M A Jacquier; Claire Lionnet; Jean-Pierre Martinant; Peter M Rogowsky; Thomas Widiez
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.