| Literature DB >> 30682780 |
Hsu-Chih Tai1, I-Shiang Tzeng2, Yen-Ching Liang3, Hsiu-Hui Liao4, Chun-Hsien Su5, Woon-Man Kung6,7,8.
Abstract
This study aimed to establish a friendly environment of active living and healthy eating for citizens while promoting and increasing knowledge of healthy exercise. Acquisition of physical activity skills and citizens' lifestyle changes result in reduction in rates of obesity and deaths related to underlying metabolism syndrome. This study used a non-experimental cross-sectional design to survey residents living in Taiwan's rural Miaoli County. The inclusion criterion was positive screening for metabolic syndrome. In total, 2068 participants were recruited, and 1886 questionnaires (91.2%) were completed. An organization-spreading strategy and home convenient Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability tactic were applied to the assessment, promotion, evaluation, and planning of the project via an obesity-causing environmental scan, oriental synergy aerobics, acupuncture points massage, guide books, broadcasting, town-based "shape-it-station", and a vending cart created to facilitate the acquisition of healthy foods. After the intervention, results revealed that health condition, regular exercise habits, diet behavior, metabolic syndrome cognition, and body weight became better than before. Appropriate promotion of healthy cities through public health measures may effectively reduce the threat of death due to metabolic syndrome, which in turn reduces overall, and represents successful control of a typical non-communicable disease.Entities:
Keywords: exercise; healthy eating; metabolic syndrome; weight loss
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30682780 PMCID: PMC6388379 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Response rate of 18 townships in Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability (LOHAS) program in Miaoli County, Taiwan.
| Township | Pre-Test | Post-Test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | Response Rate |
| % | Response Rate | |
| Miaoli | 296 | 14.3 | 100.0 | 236 | 12.5 | 79.7 |
| Yuanli | 160 | 7.7 | 100.0 | 126 | 6.7 | 78.8 |
| Tongxiao | 159 | 7.7 | 100.0 | 158 | 8.4 | 99.4 |
| Zhunan | 148 | 7.2 | 100.0 | 146 | 7.7 | 98.6 |
| Toufen | 243 | 11.8 | 100.0 | 177 | 9.4 | 72.8 |
| Houlong | 107 | 5.2 | 100.0 | 107 | 5.7 | 100.0 |
| Zhuolan | 48 | 2.3 | 100.0 | 48 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
| Dahu | 78 | 3.8 | 100.0 | 77 | 4.1 | 98.7 |
| Gongguan | 84 | 4.1 | 100.0 | 82 | 4.3 | 97.6 |
| Tongluo | 97 | 4.7 | 100.0 | 96 | 5.1 | 99.0 |
| Nanzhuang | 46 | 2.2 | 100.0 | 46 | 2.4 | 100.0 |
| Touwu | 114 | 5.5 | 100.0 | 114 | 6.1 | 100.0 |
| Sanyi | 104 | 5.0 | 100.0 | 89 | 4.7 | 85.6 |
| Xihu | 104 | 5.0 | 100.0 | 104 | 5.5 | 100.0 |
| Zaoqiao | 85 | 4.1 | 100.0 | 85 | 4.5 | 100.0 |
| Sanwan | 48 | 2.3 | 100.0 | 48 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
| Shitan | 80 | 3.9 | 100.0 | 79 | 4.2 | 98.8 |
| Tai’an | 67 | 3.2 | 100.0 | 67 | 3.6 | 100.0 |
| Total | 2068 | 100 | 100.0 | 1886 | 100 | 91.2 |
Summary of educational sessions in the participant group in Miaoli County, Taiwan.
| Sessions | Objectives | A Summary of Topics and Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy eating | To increase awareness of the benefits of healthy eating | -Set one day per month as “vegetable and fruit healthy day”: media broadcasting promotion movie on the same day |
| Regular exercise | To increase exercise capacity gradually | -Provide healthy recreational sports map: set the flash board for the length and calorie expenditure of regular walking |
| Healthy weight loss | To prevent the risk of metabolic syndrome | -Evaluation by questionnaire (cause of overweight environmental assessment, exercise and eat healthy investigation) and weight scale |
Figure 1Study design.
Comparison of the scores of healthy eating behaviors among the subjects of different social demographic characteristics of the LOHAS program in Miaoli County, Taiwan.
| Characteristics | Category |
| Mean | SD | t/F | Post Hoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male (1) | 561 | 72.49 | 15.81 | −0.02 | |
| Female (2) | 1415 | 72.50 | 16.20 | |||
| Age | 20–29 (1) | 112 | 71.72 | 12.82 | 2.81* | (7) > (3), (4), (5) |
| 30–39 (2) | 319 | 73.64 | 11.40 | |||
| 40–49 (3) | 391 | 71.81 | 15.59 | |||
| 50–59 (4) | 398 | 71.90 | 16.20 | |||
| 60–69 (5) | 354 | 71.79 | 18.32 | |||
| 70–79 (6) | 275 | 72.55 | 19.54 | |||
| 80–89 (7) | 77 | 79.07 | 11.79 | |||
| Birthplace | Weinan (1) | 691 | 71.73 | 16.46 | 2.67 * | (3) > (1), (2), (4) |
| Hakka (2) | 1137 | 72.89 | 15.96 | |||
| Aboriginal (3) | 62 | 77.03 | 11.92 | |||
| Other provinces (4) | 70 | 70.70 | 17.85 | |||
| Education level | Elementary school or under level (1) | 564 | 73.01 | 17.44 | 2.51 * | (5) > (3) |
| Junior high school (2) | 274 | 73.52 | 15.29 | |||
| High school (3) | 337 | 70.74 | 17.05 | |||
| College (4) | 622 | 72.01 | 14.68 | |||
| Graduate institute (5) | 157 | 74.96 | 14.37 | |||
| Marital status | Celibate (1) | 224 | 72.38 | 13.55 | 0.26 | |
| Married (2) | 1560 | 72.36 | 16.40 | |||
| Separated/Divorced (3) | 41 | 71.21 | 14.62 | |||
| Widowed (4) | 144 | 73.40 | 16.48 | |||
| Religion | None (1) | 563 | 73.75 | 14.09 | 2.38 | |
| Taoism (2) | 730 | 72.42 | 16.07 | |||
| Buddhism (3) | 506 | 71.05 | 18.43 | |||
| I-Kuan Tao (4) | 36 | 73.55 | 12.93 | |||
| Christian/Catholic (5) | 102 | 74.60 | 11.92 | |||
| Working situation | None (housekeeper) (1) | 710 | 73.72 | 16.00 | 1.69 | |
| Unemployed (2) | 43 | 69.96 | 16.79 | |||
| Retired (3) | 219 | 71.37 | 20.03 | |||
| Part time (4) | 68 | 72.53 | 16.21 | |||
| Full time (5) | 891 | 72.14 | 14.54 | |||
| Occupational class | Public service (1) | 190 | 70.17 | 16.72 | 4.52 *** | (2) > (4) |
| Teach (2) | 457 | 73.90 | 14.06 | |||
| Agriculture (3) | 77 | 74.28 | 13.86 | |||
| Craft (4) | 121 | 68.60 | 15.91 | |||
| Business (5) | 47 | 69.26 | 15.31 | |||
| Freelance (6) | 99 | 69.24 | 16.50 |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Comparison of scores before and after the LOHAS program in Miaoli County, Taiwan.
| Index |
| Before | After | Paired T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolic syndrome cognition | 1612 | 56.80 ± 26.77 | 73.37 ± 23.95 | 23.12 *** |
| Exercise index score | 1747 | 36.89 ± 26.44 | 41.01 ± 24.78 | 4.80 *** |
| Diet behavior standard score | 1741 | 72.31 ± 16.24 | 75.64 ± 14.85 | 6.35 *** |
| Health condition standard score | 1827 | 63.43 ± 12.75 | 64.17 ± 12.98 | 1.76 |
Different compliances in the 4 variables resulted in some participants lost to follow-up during the program. *** p < 0.001.
Regular exercise measures in cross-tabulation.
| Intervention | Pre-Test | Post-Test | Chi-Square | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | No | Yes | ||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||
| Regular exercise measures | 710 | 50.6 | 694 | 49.4 | 645 | 45.9 | 759 | 54.1 | 6.09 * |
Value of Chi-square obtained by comparing % in the variable values using McNemar’s test. * p < 0.05.