Blockade of the PD-1 axis alone is not sufficient to activate HIV-1 virion production from CD4+ T cells of individuals on suppressive ART.

Blockade of the programmed cell death protein/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is now commonly used for cancer immunotherapy and has therapeutic potential in chronic viral infections including HIV-1. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade could augment HIV-1-specific immune responses and reverse HIV-1 latency, but the latter effect has not been clearly shown. We tested the ability of the human anti-PD-L1 mAb BMS-936559 and the human anti-PD-1 mAb nivolumab to increase HIV-1 virion production ex vivo from different peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations obtained from donors on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). Fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), CD8-depleted PBMC, total CD4+ T cells, and resting CD4+ T cells were purified from whole blood of HIV-1-infected donors and cultured in varying concentrations of BMS-936559 (20, 5, or 1.25μg/mL) or nivolumab (5 or 1.25μg/mL), with or without anti-CD3/CD28 stimulatory antibodies. Culture supernatants were assayed for virion HIV-1 RNA by qRT-PCR. Ex vivo exposure to BMS-936559 or nivolumab, with or without anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, did not consistently increase HIV-1 virion production from blood mononuclear cell populations. Modest (2-fold) increases in virus production were observed in a subset of donors and in some cell types but were not reproducible in longitudinal samples. Cell surface expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 were not associated with changes in virus production. Ex vivo blockade of the PD-1 axis alone has limited effects on HIV-1 latency.

Introduction

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV-1 infection because of a persistent reservoir of cells carrying intact proviruses that are capable of infectious virus production, leading to virus replication, spread and rebound viremia if ART is stopped [1-8]. The “shock and kill” strategy for an HIV-1 cure aims to deplete the HIV-1 reservoir by reversing latency and promoting the death of infected cells, either by viral cytopathic effect or by immune-mediated killing [9]. Immune checkpoint blockade is a strategy that has been investigated for its potential to enhance HIV-1-specific immunity [10], and promote proviral expression (i.e., provide a “kick”) by activation of infected CD4+ T cells. Generally, immune checkpoints regulate the immune system to promote self-tolerance and limit inflammation to minimize collateral tissue damage [10,11]. In chronic HIV-1 infection, immune checkpoint expression is increased both in individuals with uncontrolled viremia and in those on ART with suppression of viremia [12,13], and is associated with more rapid HIV-1 disease progression [14] and shorter time to viral rebound following ART cessation [15]. This important role of immune checkpoint expression is further supported by ex vivo studies using human cells and in vivo studies in both animal models and humans demonstrating that HIV-1-specific immune function is augmented by blockade of immune checkpoints [10,16-19].

The FDA has approved monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for the treatment of cancer that block the immune checkpoints cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or one of its two natural ligands, PD-L1. Ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 mAb, was FDA approved in 2011 for treatment of metastatic melanoma after it was shown to improve overall survival [20]. However, the associated toxicities with ipilimumab are likely too severe to be used in HIV-1-infected individuals on ART who are otherwise healthy [10,21].

Multiple therapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have been approved by the FDA. Nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 mAb, is approved for treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), Hodgkin lymphoma, advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell cancer, and urothelial cancer. Other antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis include pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), durvalumab (anti-PD-L1), avelumab (anti-PD-L1), and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1). PD-1 blockade has led to improved survival and lower rates of high-grade toxicities in advanced melanoma compared to CTLA-4 blockade [22,23]. Limited case reports suggest that blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis may also promote anti-HIV immune responses in HIV-1 infected patients [18,24-26]. PD-L1 blockade with BMS-936559 was also shown to be generally well-tolerated in HIV-1-infected participants and resulted in increased HIV-1 gag-specific polyfunctional CD8+ T cell responses [16]. These preliminary data suggest that blockade of the PD-1 axis has a potential role in immune control of HIV-1.

To address the possibility that immune checkpoint blockade can reverse HIV-1 latency, the effects of anti-PD-L1 (BMS-936559) or anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) mAb on virus production were assessed ex vivo with different cell populations from HIV-1-infected individuals on long-term suppressive ART. Cultured cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of BMS-936559 or nivolumab, with or without anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, followed by measurement of virion release into the cell culture supernatants. Cell viability and PD-1/PD-L1 expression were also measured and examined for associations with HIV-1 production.

Results

Donor characteristics

Experiments were performed with blood samples drawn from 16 chronically HIV-1-infected volunteers on suppressive ART with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies (cp)/mL (Table 1). A subset of donors had samples drawn at multiple, longitudinal time points to assess the reproducibility of observed ex vivo responses.

Table 1

Donor characteristics.

Donor	Race	Sex	Age	Duration of Infection(est years)	Duration of Viremia Suppression(years)	Nadir CD4+ T Cell Count(cells/mm3)	Current CD4+ T Cell Count(cells/mm3)	Plasma HIV-1 RNA(cp/mL by Single Copy Assay)	HIV-1 DNA(cp/106 PBMC)
O5	AA	F	59	16	15	13	930	0.7	62
E1	CA	M	46	5	4	355	634	10.7	205
K4	CA	M	47	19	6	212	980	< 0.4	150
W1	CA	M	56	13	7	93	1210	1.3	594
B3	AA	F	56	23–25	12–14	410	1373–1505	1.0–1.7	761
W7	AA	F	52	18–20	2–4	435	792–1042	1.7–10	529
D1	AA	M	52	15–17	6–8	18	412–564	< 0.6–8.5	473
E4	CA	F	47	20–22	3–5	272	461–507	< 0.7	133
E5	AA	F	61	15–17	8–10	512	784–1033	< 0.6 - < 0.7	793
T1	CA	M	61	19–21	13–15	88	630–650	14	144
A3	AA	M	42	6	1	323	605	2	513
C5	CA	M	40	6–8	6–7	185	699–805	< 0.6	26
F6	AA	M	59	21	17	314	1023	15.8	849
K5	CA	M	60	24–26	9–10	80	410–759	2–3.8	310
M1	AA	M	42	19	1	210	524	10	448
R1	AA	M	60	17	16	576	898	< 0.7	36
Medians			54	16.5	6.5	242	824	1.68	379

Rows in white, dark grey, or light grey are donors whose cells were used in experiments with nivolumab, BMS-936559, or both, respectively. Ranges of values are given for donors on whom longitudinal sampling was performed. AA, African American; CA, Caucasian American; M, male; F, female.

Blockade with anti-PD-L1 mAb (BMS-936559)

The effects of BMS-936559, a fully human IgG4 anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody [27], on HIV-1 production were determined for PBMC, total CD4+ T cells, and/or resting CD4+ T cells, all derived from fresh whole blood. Resting CD4+ T cells were CD69negCD25negHLA-DRneg. Cells were incubated with either (1) BMS-936559 at concentrations that reflect therapeutic plasma concentrations (1.25, 5, and 20μg/mL) [27], (2) an isotype control antibody, (3) media alone (no-Ab control), or (4) anti-CD3/CD28 antibody-coated beads (Dynabeads, Invitrogen). Following seven days of culture, virion production was measured as HIV-1 RNA in cell-free supernatant using qRT-PCR [28]. Cell viability was measured using CellTiter-Fluor (Promega).

Experiments with BMS-936559 were performed with cells from 12 donors (Table 1). The median age of donors was 53 years (range 40–61). Donors had a median duration of infection of 18.6 years (range 6.0–24.4) and a median duration of suppressed viremia (<50 cp/mL) of 7.7 years (range 1.4–17.4). The median nadir CD4 was 293 cells/mm3 (range 18–576) and the median current CD4 was 729 cells/mm3 (range 461–1373). The median residual plasma viremia, measured by the single-copy assay [29], was 1.6 cp/mL (range <0.4–15.8). Some donors had insufficient cell yields from large volume phlebotomy (180mL whole blood) to assay all cell types simultaneously, so priority was given to PBMC, total and resting CD4+ T cells, in descending order. Flow cytometry staining was performed to assess the purity of the isolated cell subsets. Isolated total CD4+ T cells had a median 96% frequency of CD4+ T cells (range 93.2–98.3); resting CD4+ T cells had a median 96.9% frequency of CD4+ T cells (range 92.8–98.8) and a median 0.0% frequency of HLA-DR+ T cells (0.0–0.2).

For statistical analyses, virion production below the assay limit of detection (30 cp/mL culture supernatant) was considered non-detectable and set at 0 cp/mL. Cell viability was normalized to the no-Ab control for each cell population within each donor. Donor D1 had high levels of spontaneous virion production in the no-Ab and isotype controls (up to 15,290 cp/mL) and was excluded from analyses. The raw data for virion production is tabulated in S1 Table. Median HIV-1 RNA levels in supernatants from medium control cells for the other 11 donors was 50 cp/mL. Anti-CD3/CD28 treatment led to statistically significant increases in virion production from each cell population compared to isotype controls (PBMC: median 1746 cp/mL, p<0.01; total CD4+ T cells: median 18,773 cp/mL, p<0.01; resting CD4+ T cells: median 886 cp/mL, p<0.01; by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) (Fig 1A, S1 Fig). Anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation also increased cell viability for total CD4+ and resting CD4+ T cell types (total CD4+ T cells: median 3.9-fold increase, p = 0.02; resting CD4+ T cells: median 3.3-fold increase, p = 0.03; by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) (Fig 1B). No significant increases in cell viability of PBMC were observed following anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation. Across all donors, none of the concentrations of BMS-936559 resulted in statistically significant differences in virion production or cell viability compared to the isotype control for each cell population (Fig 1).

Fig 1

Virion production and cell viability in response to BMS-936559.

Median HIV-1 virion production across all donors after 7 days of stimulation with BMS-936559 (Fig 1A). Median fold-change in cell viability across all donors from no-Ab control after 7 day treatment with BMS-936559 (Fig 1B). * = multiplicity adjusted, p<0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. NAC = no-Ab control; IC = isotype control; 3/28 = anti-CD3/CD28. Error bars = Interquartlie range (IQR).

Despite the lack of a statistically significant overall virologic response to BMS-936559, we investigated whether cell types or certain BMS-936559 concentrations were associated with increased virus production (i.e., virus activation), defined as 2-fold greater HIV-1 RNA (cp/mL) in supernatants from cells treated with BMS-936559 compared to isotype control. If the isotype control led to virion production below the assay limit of detection (30 cp/mL of culture supernatant), then a response was defined as twice the limit of detection (>60 cp/mL). So defined, virus activation responses were observed for at least one concentration of BMS-936559 in at least one cell population from 7 of 11 donors. More specifically, virus activation responses were observed in PBMC from 4 of 11 donors (median 706 cp/mL for conditions producing virus activation), in total CD4+ T cells from 4 of 10 donors (median 81 cp/mL), and in resting CD4+ T cells from 1 of 8 donors (74 cp/mL). If responses were defined using a more stringent criteria of 3-fold increase in supernatant HIV-1 RNA compared to isotype control and >90 cp/mL, then virus activation was observed in PBMC from 4 of 11 donors (median 706 cp/mL), in total CD4+ T cells from 2 of 10 donors (median 7004 cp/mL), and in resting CD4+ T cells from 0 of 8 donors. Across all donors, the frequency of virus activation was not significantly different among the different cell types or across different BMS-936559 concentrations (p>0.05 by chi-squared test). HIV DNA frequency did not correlate with virus reactivation (p>0.05 by Mann-Whitney test).

To determine if virus activation responses to BMS-936559 were longitudinally reproducible, five donors (B3, W7, E5, C5, and K5) who showed >2-fold virus activation in one or more cell types had subsequent experiments performed with new blood draws using at least one of the cell populations that initially had responded to BMS-936559. The intervals between phlebotomies ranged from 3–26 months (median 15 months). Of the five donors with repeat experiments performed, only K5 had a reproducible response (S1 Fig). The first experiment with K5 showed 2,353 cp/mL of HIV-1 RNA in supernatants from total CD4+ T cells incubated with 20μg/mL BMS-936559. The second experiment with cells from this donor showed 683 cp/mL of HIV-1 RNA in supernatants from total CD4+ T cells incubated with 20 ug/mL of BMS-936559, as well as additional responses with 1.25 and 5 μg/mL BMS-936559 (391 and 62 HIV-1 RNA cp/mL, respectively). A third experiment with total CD4+ T cells from this donor did not show virus activation above isotype control at any BMS-936559 concentration. The proportions of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression varied by 0.6 to 7.2-fold amongst CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells across time points. These findings indicate that virus activation responses from BMS-936559 are infrequent, variable, and generally not reproducible in longitudinal samples.

Although virologic responses to BMS-936559 were not significant or reproducible, we hypothesized that blockade of PD-L1 alone may be insufficient to activate virus production and would require stimulation once the inhibitory effect of PD-L1 was removed. The PD-1 axis is known to suppress T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, so PD-1 axis blockade may increase HIV-1 latency reversal in T cells that are stimulated via the TCR [30,31]. To investigate this possibility, additional experiments were performed using cells from three donors who showed >2-fold virus activation responses to BMS-936559 (Donors W7, C5, K5). For each donor, the same cell populations that responded to BMS-936559 previously without additional stimulation were studied. Cells were stimulated using anti-CD3/CD28 antibody-coated beads (1 bead per cell) and cultured alone, with BMS-936559 at varying concentrations (1.25, 5, and 20 μg/mL), or with an isotype control. Virion production and cell viability were measured following seven days of culture, as described above, and were normalized relative to stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 alone. None of the concentrations of BMS-936559 in anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated cells resulted in statistically significant increases in virion production or cell viability compared to isotype control (S3 Table).

Blockade with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab)

The ability of PD-1 blockade using nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 anti-PD-1 mAb [23,32-40], to activate virus production was also evaluated ex vivo. The experimental methods were similar to above, except with modification of the cell types tested. Of the different cell populations assessed for virus activation responses to BMS-936559, PBMC and total CD4+ T cells had the greatest proportion of responses across donors. The greater response rates in PBMC may be caused by PD-L1 expression on antigen-presenting cells [41] and the greater response rates in total CD4+ T cells may be caused by the presence of activated CD4+ T cells [42,43]. Since blockade of the PD-1 axis can improve HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cell function [10], CD8-depleted PBMC were also evaluated for virus activation in response to nivolumab. The limited cell yields from large volume phlebotomies (180mL) did not permit assessment of all four cell populations, so resting CD4+ T cells were excluded from experiments with nivolumab because they had the fewest virus activation responses to BMS-936559.

Virus activation by nivolumab was assessed by culturing cells with either media alone, with nivolumab at varying concentrations that reflect therapeutic plasma concentrations (5 or 20 μg/mL) [32,40], or with isotype control, with or without anti-CD3/CD28 antibody-coated beads. Following seven days of treatment, virion production and cell viability were measured, as described above. The raw data for virion production is included in S3 Table. Ex vivo responses to nivolumab were evaluated in ten donors. Of these donors, the median age was 54.5 years (range 46–61). The median estimated duration of HIV-1 infection was 18.3 years (range 5.7–25.9) and the median duration of suppressed viremia (<50 cp/mL) was 8.2 years (range 4.5–15.8). Median nadir CD4 was 242 cells/mm3 (range 13–512) and the median current CD4 was 955 cells/mm3 (range 507–1426). The median residual plasma viremia was 1.1 cp/mL (range <0.4 to 10.7) (Table 1).

Anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation alone led to significant increases in virion production relative to isotype control alone (0–11 cp/mL) for each cell population (Fig 2A, PBMC: median supernatant HIV-1 RNA 728 cp/mL, p<0.01; CD8-depleted PBMC: median 2,907 cp/mL, p = 0.02; total CD4+ T cells: median 10,233 cp/mL, p<0.01; by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) and increased cell viability compared to isotype control in PBMC and total CD4+ T cells (PBMC: median 1.3-fold increase, p<0.01; total CD4+ T cells: median 2.5-fold increase, p<0.01; by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test). By contrast, incubation with nivolumab did not significantly increase virion production (Fig 2A) or cell viability (Fig 2B) across donors compared to isotype control for each of the cell populations tested (p>0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test).

Fig 2

Virion production and cell viability in response to nivolumab.

Median virion production across all donors in response to nivolumab (Fig 2A). Median-fold difference in cell viability across all donors in response to nivolumab or anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation compared to isotype control (Fig 2B). Median virion production in response to nivolumab in cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 (Fig 2C). Median cell viability in response to nivolumab in cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 (Fig 2D). NAC = no-Ab control; IC = isotype control; 3/28 = anti-CD3/CD28; nivo = nivolumab. Error bars = IQR.

In additional analyses, virus activation responses were defined as a 2-fold or greater increase in virion production from cells treated with nivolumab relative to cells treated with isotype control. As above, if the isotype control had virion production below the assay limit of detection (30 cp/mL) then a response was defined as twice the limit of detection (>60 cp/mL). For cells treated with nivolumab alone, 2-fold virus activation responses were observed for at least one concentration of nivolumab in at least one cell population from 3 of 9 donors. Responses were observed in PBMC from 2 of 9 donors (median 234 cp/mL in conditions with virologic responses), in CD8-depleted PBMC from 3 of 7 donors (median 248 cp/mL), and in total CD4+ T cells from 2 of 9 donors (median 185 cp/mL). When virologic responses were defined using stricter criteria of 3-fold increased virion production compared to isotype control and >90 cp/mL, virus activation was observed in PBMC from 1 of 9 donors (332 cp/mL), in CD8-depleted PBMC from 3 of 7 donors (median 299 cp/mL), and in total CD4+ T cells from 2 of 9 donors (median 185 cp/mL). Across all donors, no significant differences in virus activation responses were found between cell populations or among the different nivolumab concentrations (p>0.05 by Fisher’s exact test). HIV DNA level did not correlate with reactivation responses (p>0.05 by Mann-Whitney test). No difference in the frequencies of virus activation responses were observed between incubation with BMS-936559 alone and nivolumab alone (p>0.05 by Fisher’s exact test).

For analysis of experiments in which cells were treated with a combination of anti-CD3/CD28 and nivolumab, the virion production and cell viability levels were normalized relative to the anti-CD3/CD28 only treatment condition. No significant differences in virion production or viability were found in response to nivolumab as compared to isotype control in the anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated cells (p>0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) (Fig 2C and Fig 2D).

Immunophenotyping

The immunophenotype of PBMC was characterized using flow cytometry to measure the frequency of PD-1 and PD-L1 surface expression on CD3+CD4+ cells and CD3+CD4neg (CD8+) cells (S4 Table). PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were detectable on CD4+ T cells and CD4neg (CD8+) T cells in all donors. For the BMS-936559 experiments, the median PD-1 expression on CD8+ T-cells was 29.9% (range 19.3–42.5), median PD-1 expression on CD4+ T-cells was 46.1% (range 26.0–66.4), median PD-L1 expression on CD8+ T-cells was 26.71% (7.2–49.7), median PD-L1 expression on CD4+ T-cells was 31.1% (16.9–60.6). For the nivolumab experiments, the median PD-1 expression on CD8+ T-cells was 24.7% (range 11.7–30.1), median PD-1 expression on CD4+ T-cells was 35.2% (range 13.7–54.0), median PD-L1 expression on CD8+ T-cells was 5.3% (1.6–24.0), median PD-L1 expression on CD4+ T-cells was 15.9% (2.6–42.7). These values are consistent with previously reported values for HIV-infected individuals on ART [13,41,44-49].

Flow cytometry studies were completed in 3 batches along with health donor cells in each batch. The PD-1 expression range on CD8+ T-cells range was 32.4–44.9%, PD-1 expression range on CD4+ T-cells was 25.5–40.3%, PD-L1 expression range on CD8+ T-cells was 3.6–30.4%, PD-L1 expression range on CD4+ T-cells was 11.4–35.6%.

For nivolumab, virus reactivation responses, by either the 2-fold or 3-fold increase definitions, correlated with baseline PD-1 expression on CD4+ T-cells (P = 0.047), PD-L1 expression on CD8+ T-cells (P = 0.024), and PD-L1 expression on CD4+ T-cells (P = 0.047) by the Mann-Whitney test. For BMS-936559, virus reactivation responses, by the 3-fold increase in virion production definition, correlated with PD-1 expression on CD4+ T-cells (P = 0.0303) by Mann-Whitney test. These correlations became insignificant after the Bonferroni correction.

Discussion

Immune checkpoint blockade can promote anti-HIV-1 immunity [10,16-19] but may also possess the desired property of proviral activation (i.e., latency reversal). CD4+ T cells expressing immune checkpoint markers (PD-1, TIGIT, LAG3) are enriched for HIV-1-infected cells and correlate with the number of HIV-1 infected cells in individuals receiving ART [13,44,45,50-52]. Therefore, immune checkpoint blockade could impact the HIV-1 reservoir by destabilizing proviral latency and enhancing proviral expression. This concept was demonstrated in viremic and aviremic SIV-infected rhesus macaques wherein in vivo checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 antibody induced transient increases in SIV viremia [53,54]. Observed responses were associated with CD4+ T cell proliferation [53], suggesting that PD-1 blockade promoted T cell activation that led to latency reversal. By contrast, other in vivo macaque studies showed no change in viremia when disrupting the PD-1 axis [55,56].

Preliminary ex vivo human studies have reported that PD-1 blockade can increase virion production in CD4+ T cells from HIV-1-infected viremic donors [57] and in CD4+ T cells with allogeneic cell or cytokine stimulation (IL-7, IL-15) from donors on suppressive ART [58]. A number of case studies of HIV-1-infected individuals with NSCLC or malignant melanoma who were treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) reported changes in HIV-1 RNA or DNA [17-19,59]. By contrast, other studies investigating immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of cancer in HIV-1-infected individuals have not observed changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA and only inconsistent changes in HIV-1 DNA [17-19,24,26,59]. No changes in residual viremia or cell-associated HIV-1 RNA were observed in HIV-1-infected participants on effective ART without concomitant malignancy in a phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose study of BMS-936559 [16]. Results from this clinical trial did not reveal any changes in residual viremia or cell-associated HIV-1 DNA or RNA in 6 of 6 patients treated with 0.3 mg/kg BMS-936559, although there was evidence of improved HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cell function in 2 of 6 participants [16]. The dose in this study was lower than the lowest evaluated doses in phase I clinical studies for cancer [27] and may have been too low to increase virus production.

In the current ex vivo study, BMS-936559 and nivolumab were evaluated at concentrations that reflect therapeutic plasma concentrations and are associated with PD-L1 and PD-1 receptor occupancy of ≥70%, respectively [27,32,40,60]. We conducted analyses in which virus activation was defined as 2-fold increases in HIV-1 RNA compared to cells treated with isotype control. So defined, virus activation responses in at least one cell type were observed in 7 of 11 donors incubated with BMS-936559 and in 3 of 9 donors with cells treated with nivolumab. However, responses were inconsistent, occurring in varying cell types and at different antibody concentrations. Responses also did not correlate with HIV DNA levels. Baseline PD-1 and PD-L1 expression correlated with virus production, although these results should be re-evaluated in future studies given the small sample size of this study.

Recent studies have shown that the PD-1 axis suppresses CD28 signaling [30] and that effective PD-1 targeted therapy for restoration of CD8+ T cell function requires CD28 co-stimulation [31]. Yet, in our study ex vivo virologic responses to PD-1/L1 blockade were not increased by TCR/CD28 stimulation. It is possible that the stimulation used in this study via anti-CD3/28 coated beads was too potent to observe an augmented response with PD-1/L1 blockade as compared to prior studies, that used allogeneic cell or cytokine stimulation (IL-7, IL-15) [57,58].

The absence of a consistent effect of PD-1 axis blockade on virus production among the donors studied is likely multifactorial. First, although PD-1 expression is enriched in HIV-1 infected cells, many HIV-1 infected cells do not express PD-1 and would therefore not be expected to respond to PD-1 axis blockade [13,44]. Second, HIV-1 infected cells that express PD-1 may be resistant to PD-1 axis blockade from severe exhaustion [61] and upregulation of additional immune checkpoints [13,61]. Co-expression of multiple immune checkpoint molecules is associated with higher frequencies of HIV-infected cells compared to expression of single immune checkpoints [13], consequently, inhibition of multiple immune checkpoints may be required for more effective HIV-1 latency reversal. Combination blockade of multiple inhibitory receptors has been shown to improve immune responses, although the associated toxicities will limit this approach [23,62,63]. Third, it is possible that testing more cells or using more sensitive assays of proviral activation, such as measuring HIV-1 RNA transcripts, could have revealed more subtle effects of immune checkpoint blockade than by measuring virion production. Fourth, the infrequent and variable responses that were not longitudinally reproduced in this study suggests that responses are stochastic, possibly from spontaneous viral activation. It is possible that concomitant stimulation may be required to observe the effects of PD-1 blockade, as observed in previous studies [57,58]. Finally, in vivo studies, including mouse models, may allow for more rigorous testing of immune checkpoint blockade. Further human clinical trials will be the best determinant of whether immune checkpoint blockade is safe and can meaningfully impact the HIV-1 reservoir, and whether these therapies are safe for people living with HIV-1.

Methods

Quantification of residual plasma viremia by single-copy assay

Plasma was harvested by centrifugation of whole blood at 400 x g for 10 min, followed by additional centrifugation of plasma at 1350 x g for 15 min. Cell-free plasma was stored at -80°C. HIV-1 RNA was quantified using a two-step qRT-PCR assay that targets the integrase region of pol [29]. The assay limit of detection is 1 copy of RNA per qPCR reaction.

Isolation of PBMC, CD8-depleted PBMC, total CD4+ T cells, and resting CD4+ T cells

Large-volume phlebotomies (180 mL) were performed on patients who were on suppressive ART for ≥16 months. PBMC were isolated by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation. CD8+ T cells were removed from PBMC by positive selection using BD iMag anti-human CD8 Particles (BD). Total CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMC by negative selection using the EasySepCD4+ T cell Enrichment Kit (STEMCELL). Resting CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMC by negative selection using the EasySep Human Custom Enrichment Kit (STEMCELL) that depletes cells expressing CD8, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD36, CD56, CD66b, CD123, TCRγ/δ, glycophorin A, CD69, CD25, and HLA-DR.

Cell culture

PBMC, CD8-depleted PBMC, total CD4+ T cells, and/or resting CD4+ T cells were seeded into 48-well plates at 1x106 cells/mL with up to three replicates. Cells were cultured for 7 days with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS, 2mM L-Glutamine, 0.6% penicillin/streptomycin, and 300nM each of efavirenz and raltegravir to prevent new rounds of infection. Cultures were performed for 7 days because this was the peak of virion accumulation in preliminary studies with anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation. Cells were treated with varying concentrations of BMS-936559 (1.25, 5, or 20μg/mL), varying concentrations of nivolumab (5 or 20μg/mL), or IgG4 isotype control (20μg/mL) with or without concurrent incubation with anti-CD3/CD28 antibody-coated beads at a concentration of 1 bead/cell (Dynabeads Human T-Activator CD3/CD28, Invitrogen).

Quantification of virion HIV-1 RNA in cell culture supernatant

After 7 days of culture, supernatants from replicate wells were collected and pooled. HIV-1 RNA was quantified using the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Roche Cobas Taqman v2.0 (CAP/CTM). The assay limit of detection is 20 cp per reaction, which scaled to 30 cp/mL of culture supernatant. Supernatants from cultures of fresh cells measured using CAP/CTM have previously been shown to be free of contaminating HIV-1 DNA [28,64].

Quantification of HIV DNA by qPCR

Cells were stored in 1x106 aliquots at -80°C. HIV DNA was quantified as previously described [65].

Assays of cellular viability

Day 7 cells were assessed for viability using CellTiter Fluor (Promega). Fluorescence was read at excitation/emission 390/505nm.

Flow cytometric analyses

Cellular purities of isolated total CD4+ T cells, resting CD4+ T cells, and CD8-depleted PBMC were assessed by flow cytometry. The purity of total CD4+ T cells and resting CD4+ T cells were compared to PBMC by staining aliquots of 1x106 PBMC, purified total CD4+ T cells, and resting CD4+ T cells with FITC anti-CD4 (RPA-T4, BD), FITC isotype control (mouse IgG1κ, BD), PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-HLA-DR (G46-6, BD), or PerCP-Cy5.5 isotype control (mouse IgG2aκ, BD) antibodies. CD8 depletion was assessed in aliquots of 1x106 PBMC and CD8-depleted PBMC stained with V450 CD3 (UCHT1, BD) and PerCP-Cy5.5 CD8 (RPA-T8, BD). Data were acquired using an LSRII cytometer and FACSDiva software (BD). At least 20,000 events were collected from all samples. Fluorescence minus one and isotypes controls were used to set gates for analysis. The flow cytometry gating strategy is summarized in S2 Fig.

Baseline expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 on PBMC was determined on aliquots of 0.5-1x106 PBMC isolated on the day of phlebotomy. Samples were incubated with anti-PD-L1 primary antibody (BMS-936559, Bristol-Myers Squibb) or isotype control (human IgG4, Bristol-Myers Squibb) then with V500 CD3 (UCHT1, BD), PerCP CD4 (L200, BD), BV421 anti-PD-1 (EH12.2H7, BioLegend), BV421 isotype control (mouse IgG1κ BioLegend), and anti-PD-L1 secondary antibodies (mouse anti-hIgG4 PE, abcam). Following staining, samples were washed with stain buffer twice and cells were fixed using BD Cytofix buffer. Live singlet cells were identified by live-dead staining and forward scatter profiles. Fluorescence minus one controls were used to set gates for analysis.

Ethics statement

All study participants provided written, informed consent. All original, signed consent forms are maintained in the study file and all procedures were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board.

Longitudinal responses to BMS-936559.

Donors B3 (Panel A), W7 (Panel B), E5 (Panel C), C5 (Panel D), and K5 (Panel E) had repeat experiments using at least one of the cell populations that initially showed latency reversal responses to BMS-936559. Of the five donors with longitudinal experiments performed, only donor K5 had a reproducible virus activation response to BMS-936559 for total CD4+ T cells in the experiment performed with the second blood draw but not the third blood draw (Panel E). HIV RNA (copies/mL) shown are in culture supernatants of the cells and incubation conditions indicated. Total CD4 = total CD4+ T cells; Resting CD4 = resting CD4+ T cells; PBMC = Peripheral blood mononuclear cells; NAC = no-Ab control; IC = isotype control; * = not done.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Flow cytometry gating strategy.

This schematic illustrates how CD4+ and CD8+ (CD4-) T-cells were gated by flow cytometry to measure PD-1 and PD-L1 expression.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Virion production in response to BMS-936559.

Virion production as HIV RNA copies/mL. Cells with yellow shading have virologic responses when defined as being greater than twice the virion production from cells treated with isotype control or > 60 copies/mL. Cells with bolded font have virologic responses when defined as being greater than three times the virion production from cells treated with isotype control or = > 90 copies/mL. BMS = BMS-936559, IC = isotype control, AC = activation control with anti-CD3/28, TND = HIV-1 RNA target not detected.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Virion production in cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies and BMS-936559.

Virion production as HIV RNA copies/mL. 3/28 = anti-CD3/28, IC = isotype control, BMS = BMS-936559, TND = target not detected.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Virion production in response to nivolumab.

Virion production as HIV RNA copies/mL. Cells with yellow background have virologic responses when defined as being greater than twice the virion production from cells treated with isotype control or as > 60 copies/mL. Cells with bolded font have virologic responses when defined as being greater than three times the virion production from cells treated with isotype control or as > 90 copies/mL. IC = isotype control, nivo = nivolumab, AC = activation control with anti-CD3/28, TND = target not detected.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry.

The proportion of cells expressing PD-1 or PD-L1 were measured by flow cytometry on CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells. N/A = Not Applicable.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.