PURPOSE: Programmed death-1 (PD-1), an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells, may suppress antitumor immunity. This phase I study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of anti-PD-1 blockade in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors and to preliminarily assess antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) received a single intravenous infusion of anti-PD-1 (MDX-1106) in dose-escalating six-patient cohorts at 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, followed by a 15-patient expansion cohort at 10 mg/kg. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at 3 months were eligible for repeated therapy. RESULTS: Anti-PD-1 was well tolerated: one serious adverse event, inflammatory colitis, was observed in a patient with melanoma who received five doses at 1 mg/kg. One durable complete response (CRC) and two partial responses (PRs; melanoma, RCC) were seen. Two additional patients (melanoma, NSCLC) had significant lesional tumor regressions not meeting PR criteria. The serum half-life of anti-PD-1 was 12 to 20 days. However, pharmacodynamics indicated a sustained mean occupancy of > 70% of PD-1 molecules on circulating T cells > or = 2 months following infusion, regardless of dose. In nine patients examined, tumor cell surface B7-H1 expression appeared to correlate with the likelihood of response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Blocking the PD-1 immune checkpoint with intermittent antibody dosing is well tolerated and associated with evidence of antitumor activity. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens and combinatorial therapies with vaccines, targeted therapies, and/or other checkpoint inhibitors is warranted.
PURPOSE:Programmed death-1 (PD-1), an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells, may suppress antitumor immunity. This phase I study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of anti-PD-1 blockade in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors and to preliminarily assess antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) received a single intravenous infusion of anti-PD-1 (MDX-1106) in dose-escalating six-patient cohorts at 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, followed by a 15-patient expansion cohort at 10 mg/kg. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at 3 months were eligible for repeated therapy. RESULTS: Anti-PD-1 was well tolerated: one serious adverse event, inflammatory colitis, was observed in a patient with melanoma who received five doses at 1 mg/kg. One durable complete response (CRC) and two partial responses (PRs; melanoma, RCC) were seen. Two additional patients (melanoma, NSCLC) had significant lesional tumor regressions not meeting PR criteria. The serum half-life of anti-PD-1 was 12 to 20 days. However, pharmacodynamics indicated a sustained mean occupancy of > 70% of PD-1 molecules on circulating T cells > or = 2 months following infusion, regardless of dose. In nine patients examined, tumor cell surface B7-H1 expression appeared to correlate with the likelihood of response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Blocking the PD-1 immune checkpoint with intermittent antibody dosing is well tolerated and associated with evidence of antitumor activity. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens and combinatorial therapies with vaccines, targeted therapies, and/or other checkpoint inhibitors is warranted.
Authors: H Nishimura; T Okazaki; Y Tanaka; K Nakatani; M Hara; A Matsumori; S Sasayama; A Mizoguchi; H Hiai; N Minato; T Honjo Journal: Science Date: 2001-01-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Susan M Kuntz; Bradley C Leibovich; Haidong Dong; Christine M Lohse; W Scott Webster; Shomik Sengupta; Igor Frank; Alexander S Parker; Horst Zincke; Michael L Blute; Thomas J Sebo; John C Cheville; Eugene D Kwon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Scott E Strome; Haidong Dong; Hideto Tamura; Stephen G Voss; Dallas B Flies; Koji Tamada; Diva Salomao; John Cheville; Fumiya Hirano; Wei Lin; Jan L Kasperbauer; Karla V Ballman; Lieping Chen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christian Blank; Ian Brown; Amy C Peterson; Mike Spiotto; Yoshiko Iwai; Tasuku Honjo; Thomas F Gajewski Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Neil H Segal; D Williams Parsons; Karl S Peggs; Victor Velculescu; Ken W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; James P Allison Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P Waterhouse; J M Penninger; E Timms; A Wakeham; A Shahinian; K P Lee; C B Thompson; H Griesser; T W Mak Journal: Science Date: 1995-11-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kimberly Loo; Katy K Tsai; Kelly Mahuron; Jacqueline Liu; Mariela L Pauli; Priscila M Sandoval; Adi Nosrati; James Lee; Lawrence Chen; Jimmy Hwang; Lauren S Levine; Matthew F Krummel; Alain P Algazi; Miguel Pampaloni; Michael D Alvarado; Michael D Rosenblum; Adil I Daud Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-07-20
Authors: Ingunn M Stromnes; Thomas M Schmitt; Aude G Chapuis; Sunil R Hingorani; Philip D Greenberg Journal: Immunol Rev Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 12.988
Authors: Jing Gong; Sanjeev Noel; Joshua Hsu; Errol L Bush; Lois J Arend; Mohanraj Sadasivam; Sul A Lee; Johanna T Kurzhagen; Abdel Rahim A Hamad; Hamid Rabb Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2020-04-13