Literature DB >> 25891173

Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.

Caroline Robert1, Jacob Schachter, Georgina V Long, Ana Arance, Jean Jacques Grob, Laurent Mortier, Adil Daud, Matteo S Carlino, Catriona McNeil, Michal Lotem, James Larkin, Paul Lorigan, Bart Neyns, Christian U Blank, Omid Hamid, Christine Mateus, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Michele Kosh, Honghong Zhou, Nageatte Ibrahim, Scot Ebbinghaus, Antoni Ribas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immune checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced melanoma. Pembrolizumab inhibits the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint and has antitumor activity in patients with advanced melanoma.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 study, we assigned 834 patients with advanced melanoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks or four doses of ipilimumab (at 3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks. Primary end points were progression-free and overall survival.
RESULTS: The estimated 6-month progression-free-survival rates were 47.3% for pembrolizumab every 2 weeks, 46.4% for pembrolizumab every 3 weeks, and 26.5% for ipilimumab (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.58; P<0.001 for both pembrolizumab regimens versus ipilimumab; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.46 to 0.72 and 0.47 to 0.72, respectively). Estimated 12-month survival rates were 74.1%, 68.4%, and 58.2%, respectively (hazard ratio for death for pembrolizumab every 2 weeks, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.83; P=0.0005; hazard ratio for pembrolizumab every 3 weeks, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P=0.0036). The response rate was improved with pembrolizumab administered every 2 weeks (33.7%) and every 3 weeks (32.9%), as compared with ipilimumab (11.9%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Responses were ongoing in 89.4%, 96.7%, and 87.9% of patients, respectively, after a median follow-up of 7.9 months. Efficacy was similar in the two pembrolizumab groups. Rates of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 to 5 severity were lower in the pembrolizumab groups (13.3% and 10.1%) than in the ipilimumab group (19.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival and had less high-grade toxicity than did ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; KEYNOTE-006 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01866319.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891173     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1850 in total

1.  Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

Authors:  Marie Perier-Muzet; Elodie Gatt; Julien Péron; Claire Falandry; Mona Amini-Adlé; Luc Thomas; Stephane Dalle; Amelie Boespflug
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 2.  Evolutionary basis of a new gene- and immune-therapeutic approach for the treatment of malignant brain tumors: from mice to clinical trials for glioma patients.

Authors:  Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  The Prognostic Value of BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Wen Jiang; Paul D Brown; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Daniel A Wattson; Helen A Shih; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Natalie A Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Emil Lou; Thomas Amatruda; William A Sperduto; John P Kirkpatrick; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Jason K Molitoris; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Inhibiting Notch1 enhances immunotherapy efficacy in melanoma by preventing Notch1 dependent immune suppressive properties.

Authors:  Hong Qiu; Patrick M Zmina; Alex Y Huang; David Askew; Barbara Bedogni
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the Age of Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes.

Authors:  Aric Colunga; Thomas Pulliam; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Glioblastoma targeted therapy: updated approaches from recent biological insights.

Authors:  M Touat; A Idbaih; M Sanson; K L Ligon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Tumour radiosensitivity is associated with immune activation in solid tumours.

Authors:  Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Systemic BRAF/MEK Inhibitors as a Potential Treatment Option in Metastatic Conjunctival Melanoma.

Authors:  Joel M Mor; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2016-12-08

9.  Deregulated MITF sumoylation: A route to melanoma.

Authors:  Robert Ballotti; Corine Bertolotto
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 10.  Neurological Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Christophoros Astaras; Rita de Micheli; Bianca Moura; Thomas Hundsberger; Andreas F Hottinger
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.