| Literature DB >> 30679701 |
Chu-Hsuan Huang1, Po-Ting Yeh1,2, Yi-Ting Hsieh1,2, Tzyy-Chang Ho1,2, Chung-May Yang1,2, Chang-Hao Yang3,4.
Abstract
This study analyze the morphological characteristics of branching vascular networks (BVN) in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and correlate imaging characteristics with clinical presentations. We presented a retrospective observational case series for fifty cases of PCV confirmed by indocyanine green angiography. Macular OCTA were done by the AngioVue. The PCV cases were classified by distinct morphologic patterns of BVN by two retina specialists and clinical features were analyzed. The sensitivity of polyp detection by OCTA was 86% after manual segmentation and that of BVN was 90%. Three distinct morphologic patterns of BVN were identified. (1) The "Trunk" pattern (47%) exhibited major vessel trunk with features including presence of drusens, thin choroid, and larger BVN area. (2) The "Glomeruli" pattern (33%) showed anastomotic vascular network without major trunk. (3) The "Stick" pattern (20%) had localized BVN and the thickest choroid. Subtypes 2 and 3 held higher recurrence rate. In conclusions, the precise visualization of BVN on OCTA supported that OCTA might be a noninvasive tool to study the morphology of BVN in PCV, which exhibits three different morphological types. Identifying the morphology of BVN has the potential to prognosticate outcomes in PCV patients.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30679701 PMCID: PMC6345899 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37384-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The multimodal image revealed compatible multiple polyps in manual-segmented OCTA and ICGA study and the BVN was clearer in OCTA. This was a 65 year-old female who was newly diagnosed as PCV by ICGA. (a) The fundus revealed nodular lesion and retinal hemorrhage. (b) The mid-phase ICGA revealed 3 polyps indicated by black arrows and BVN. (c) Transverse OCT B-scan image at the level corresponded to horizontal dash line in (a), revealed RPE detachment and sub-RPE iso-reflective lesion. (d) Vertical OCT B-scan image at the level corresponded to vertical dash line in (a), also revealed RPE detachment and sub-RPE iso-reflective lesion. (e) Automated OCTA en face image, which revealed BVN but no definite polyp. (f) OCTA en face image after manual adjustment of level of outer plexiform layer and bruch’s membrane, which clearly revealed 3 polyps (1~3) compatible with ICGA. (g) In the representative B-scan At the level of blue line in (e), the automatically set OPL (upper green line) and bruch’s membrane (lower green line) were deviated due to high PED. (h) In the representative B scan at the level of blue line in (f), the manually adjusted OPL (purple line) and bruch’s membrane (green line) produced en face image as in (f). (i,j). Polyp structure with high flow signal in angio-flowgram which lied around RPE (circle) and localization of polyp 3 (i) and polyp 1 (j).
The demographic data and the OCTA detection rates for polyps and branching vascular network (BVN) in the treatment-naïve and prior-treated groups.
| Total (n = 50) | Treatment-naïve (n = 29) | Prior-treated (n = 21) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y/o) | 67.5 ± 7.3 | 68.8 ± 7.1 | 68.0 ± 7.4 | 0.292* |
| Gender (Female) | 32.0% | 37.9% | 23.8% | 0.291† |
| BCVA at diagnosis (LogMAR) | 0.773 ± 0.588 | 0.606 ± 0.609 | 0.831 ± 0.564 | 0.184* |
| ICGA-BVN | 76.0% | 72.41% | 80.95% | 0.485† |
| OCTA-Polyps (Automated) | 62.0% | 62.07% | 61.90% | 0.991† |
| OCTA-Polyps (Manual) | 86.0% | 82.76% | 90.48% | 0.684† |
| OCTA-BVN (Manual) | 90.0% | 82.76% | 100% | 0.066† |
*Student’s t-test.
†Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 2Three distinct patterns were identified from BVN on OCTA. Type 1: “The Trunk pattern”: presence of one or more main trunk of neovascular vessel and may have radiated branches pointing toward periphery of the vascular network. (c) The main trunk enlarged after the combination treatment while the anastomosing network shrank. (e) Type 2: “The Glomeruli pattern”: a vascular network with intensely interconnecting anastomosis, but without visible major trunk. (i) The vasculature became finer after combined therapy. (k) Type 3: “The Stick pattern”: localized fine neovascular network without definite pattern. (o) The vasculature remained after combined therapy. (q) The SRF recurred 6 months after treatment (arrowhead) in Type 2 and 3, but resolved in type 1 completely. There was presence of drusens in fundus photography in type 1 (arrow) and exudation in type 1 and 3 (empty arrow).
The demographic data, characteristics of ICGA and OCTA examinations, and treatment response between the 3 groups of distinct branching vascular network (BVN) morphology.
| Type 1 “Trunk” (n = 21) | Type 2 “Glomeruli” (n = 15) | Type 3 “Stick” (n = 9) | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y/o) | 68.0 ± 7.6 | 69.7 ± 7.3 | 65.8 ± 7.3 | 0.469* |
| Gender (Female) | 52.4% (11) | 13.3% (2) | 22.2% (2) | 0.036† |
| Treatment Naïve | 52.4% (11) | 60.0% (9) | 55.6% (5) | 0.902† |
| Presence of Drusens | 66.7% (14) | 33.3% (5) | 22.2% (2) | 0.037† |
| Submacular hemorrhage | 47.6% (10) | 53.3% (8) | 55.6% (5) | 0.903† |
| ICGA-BVN | 95.2% (20) | 93.3% (14) | 44.4% (4) | 0.001† |
| Presence of Feeder Vessel | 76.2% (16) | 60.0% (9) | 22.2% (2) | 0.022† |
| OCTA-Polyps (Manual) | 90.5% (19) | 100.0% (15) | 77.8% (7) | 0.178† |
| OCTA-SFCT (μm) | 195.5 ± 66.6 | 239.5 ± 89.7 | 284.3 ± 80.1 | 0.019*,‡ |
| OCTA-CRT (μm) | 270.6 ± 60.5 | 282.5 ± 78.7 | 259.1 ± 49.8 | 0.691* |
| OCTA-BVN area (mm2) | 0.919 ± 0.517 | 0.667 ± 0.381 | 0.404 ± 0.211 | 0.021*,§ |
| BCVA at diagnosis (LogMAR) | 0.910 ± 0.730 | 0.544 ± 0.357 | 0.530 ± 0.496 | 0.117* |
| BCVA post-PDT 6 m (LogMAR) | 0.738 ± 0.656 | 0.476 ± 0.325 | 0.503 ± 0.458 | 0.316* |
| OCTA-SRF recurrence | 28.6% (6) | 80.0% (12) | 88.9% (8) | 0.001† |
| PDT Re-Treatment rate | 28.6% (6) | 40.0% (6) | 55.6% (5) | 0.368† |
*One-way ANOVA, Scheffer test if p < 0.05, †Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. ‡Post Hoc: p = 0.023, between Type 1 and 3. §Post Hoc: p = 0.019, between Type 1 and 3, SFCT: subfoveal choroidal thickness, SRF: subretinal fluid, CRT: central retinal thickness, PDT: photodynamic therapy.