| Literature DB >> 30678308 |
Mohammad H Semreen1, Sameh S M Soliman2, Balsam Q Saeed3, Abdullah Alqarihi4, Priya Uppuluri5,6, Ashraf S Ibrahim7,8.
Abstract
Candida auris, a newly-emerging Candida species, is a serious global health threat due to its multi-drug resistant pattern, difficulty to diagnose, and the high mortality associated with its invasive and bloodstream infections. Unlike C. albicans, and C. dubliniensis which can form true hyphae, C. auris grows as yeast or pseudohyphae and is capable of developing biofilms. The reasons for the inability of C. auris to form true hyphae are currently unknown. Metabolites secreted by microorganisms, including Candida, are known as important factors in controlling morphogenesis and pathogenesis. Metabolic profiling of C. auris and C. albicans cultures was performed using gas chromatography⁻mass spectrometry (GC⁻MS). Compared to C. albicans, C. auris secreted several hyphae-inhibiting metabolites, including phenylethyl, benzyl and isoamyl alcohols. Furthermore, a biofilm-forming metabolite-tyrosol-was identified. On the other hand, several other biomarkers identified from C. auris but not from C. albicans cultures may be produced by the organism to overcome the host immune system or control fungal adaptations, and hence ease its invasion and infections. The results from this study are considered as the first identification of C. auris metabolic activities as a step forward to understand its virulence mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Candida auris; GC-MS; hyphae; metabolic profiling; morphogenesis; yeast
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678308 PMCID: PMC6384714 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24030399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Growth of C. auris (CAU09) in comparison to C. albicans at biofilm-forming condition at 4 and 16 h. Candida isolates were cultured at 37 °C in 125 mL Corning culture flasks.
Figure 2GC-MS chromatograms of Candida cultures extracts. Chromatograms of (A) C. albicans ATCC10231 strain compared to (B) C. auris (CAU09) strain. (C) and (D) GC-MS chromatograms of C. auris CAU09 at two different growth stages (C) 16 h compared to (D) 4 h incubation periods representing the differences in metabolites abundance. CAU09 was used as a representative to C. auris strains since all C. auris strains showed a similar pattern of GC-MS analysis (data not shown). Cell-free supernatants were collected, extracted by chloroform and derivatized by MSTFA and TMS prior to GC-MS analysis using GC-2010 coupled with a GC–MS QP-2010 Ultra.
Figure 3Heatmap of major identified metabolites in Candida cultures by GC-MS. Metabolite average relative percentage of four experimental replicates from two independent biological experiments were displayed as colors ranging from red to green as shown in the key. The relative percentage of a metabolite represented in relation to total areas of all detected metabolites in an extract.
Figure 4Relative percentages of metabolites produced by C. auris CAU09 cultures. (A) The metabolites produced by the organism for the purpose of its morphogenic changes. (B) The metabolites produced by the organism for the purpose of protection and colonization. The quantity of each metabolite was represented as the relative percentage by measuring the area under the peak of each metabolite in relation to the total areas of all other metabolites detected in the extract. The data display the mean of the relative percentage ± standard error of the mean. The data was graphed using Box-and-Whiskers Plots and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. P value < 0.05 was considered as significant. The standard error represents the mean of 4 replicas of two independent experiments. The level of significance was indicated by asterisks.
Figure 5Comparison of relative percentages of metabolites produced by different C. auris strains. (A) Proposed metabolites employed in morphogenic changes. (B) Proposed metabolites produced by the organism for the purpose of protection and colonization. The quantity of each metabolite was represented as the relative percentage by measuring the area under the peak of each metabolite in relation to the total areas of all other metabolites detected in the extract. The data display the mean of the relative percentage ± standard error of the mean. The data was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). P value < 0.05 was considered as significant. The standard error represents the mean of 4 experimental replicates of two independent biological experiments. The level of significance was indicated by asterisks.