Literature DB >> 30673222

Hydrocarbon Synthesis via Photoenzymatic Decarboxylation of Carboxylic Acids.

Wuyuan Zhang1, Ming Ma2, Mieke M E Huijbers1, Georgy A Filonenko3, Evgeny A Pidko3, Morten van Schie1, Sabrina de Boer4, Bastien O Burek4, Jonathan Z Bloh4, Willem J H van Berkel5, Wilson A Smith2, Frank Hollmann1.   

Abstract

A recently discovered photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis NC64A ( CvFAP) bears the promise for the efficient and selective synthesis of hydrocarbons from carboxylic acids. CvFAP, however, exhibits a clear preference for long-chain fatty acids thereby limiting its broad applicability. In this contribution, we demonstrate that the decoy molecule approach enables conversion of a broad range of carboxylic acids by filling up the vacant substrate access channel of the photodecarboxylase. These results not only demonstrate a practical application of a unique, photoactivated enzyme but also pave the way to selective production of short-chain alkanes from waste carboxylic acids under mild reaction conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30673222      PMCID: PMC6385076          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Introduction

Valorization of biobased feedstock into chemicals[1−4] and fuels[5−7] represents one of the pillars of a more sustainable society. The last few decades have seen an explosion of synthetic methodologies to transform natural products into building blocks for the chemical industry.[1−4] Catalytic methodologies for the conversion of biobased carboxylic acids, however, are largely limited to esterification or amidation reactions.[8] More recently, chemical[9−12] and biocatalytic[13−17] reduction reactions of carboxylic acids have been developed as well as some approaches for the oxidative decarboxylation into terminal alkenes.[18−21] In addition, redox-neutral decarboxylation of carboxylic acids into the corresponding alkanes represents an attractive method for the synthesis of alkanes for fuel and synthetic applications. Conventional methods, however, require harsh reaction conditions and high loadings of precious metal catalysts. This implies a significant environmental impact of these reactions and questions their economic feasibility. In addition, the selectivity of the reported methods mostly is poor due to the formation of Kolbe- and Hofer–Moest-byproducts.[22,23] To overcome some of these drawbacks, enzymes have been gaining an increasing interest for the direct formation of hydrocarbons.[24−27] Recently, a new fatty acid photodecarboxylase from the unicellular photosynthetic green microalga Chlorella variabilis NC64A (CvFAP) was reported by Beisson and co-workers.[28]CvFAP mediates the blue-light driven decarboxylation of various fatty acids to the corresponding (C1-shortened) alkanes (Figure a). CvFAP, however, shows a marked preference for long-chain fatty acids (C16–C17) with its catalytic activity dropping dramatically with shorter chain carboxylic acids. Presumably, shorter substrates are less efficiently stabilized in the long, narrow substrate access channel of the decarboxylase.[28]
Figure 1

CvFAP-catalyzed photobiocatalytic decarboxylation reaction. (a) general reaction scheme and reaction conditions; (b) schematic representation of acetic acid coordinating to the catalytic flavin group together with tetradecane as decoy molecule filling up the substrate access channel. CvFAP (PDB: 5NCC) is presented as a green cartoon showing the substrate channel as transparent gray surface, while FAD (yellow), acetic acid (blue) and tetradecane (magenta) are represented as sticks. The distances in angstroms from the carboxylate oxygen atom of acetic acid to FAD and from the C1-atom of tetradecane to both carbon atoms of acetic acid are indicated. First, acetic acid was docked into 5NCC, then tetradecane was docked into the minimized result of the first docking using VINA in Yasara (www.yasara.org). The figure was prepared using PyMol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC).

CvFAP-catalyzed photobiocatalytic decarboxylation reaction. (a) general reaction scheme and reaction conditions; (b) schematic representation of acetic acid coordinating to the catalytic flavin group together with tetradecane as decoy molecule filling up the substrate access channel. CvFAP (PDB: 5NCC) is presented as a green cartoon showing the substrate channel as transparent gray surface, while FAD (yellow), acetic acid (blue) and tetradecane (magenta) are represented as sticks. The distances in angstroms from the carboxylate oxygen atom of acetic acid to FAD and from the C1-atom of tetradecane to both carbon atoms of acetic acid are indicated. First, acetic acid was docked into 5NCC, then tetradecane was docked into the minimized result of the first docking using VINA in Yasara (www.yasara.org). The figure was prepared using PyMol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC). A similar phenomenon has been observed with the P450 monooxygenase from Bacillus megaterium, which exhibits (almost) no oxyfunctionalisation activity toward small substrate molecules. The groups of Reetz[29] and Watanabe[30] independently proposed to fill up the vacant space left by small substrate molecules with unreactive, perfluorinated fatty acids. Inspired by their work we reasoned that a similar strategy might be applicable to enlarge the substrate scope of CvFAP (Figure b). We propose using simple alkanes as decoy molecules, as cocatalysts, to accelerate the CvFAP-catalyzed decarboxylation of short-chain carboxylic acids.

Results and Discussion

We first evaluated CvFAP as a photobiocatalyst for the decarboxylation of acetic acid to methane in the presence of various decoy alkanes (Figure ). For this the enzyme was overproduced in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). A typical time course of the reaction is shown in Figure a. No methane could be detected in the absence of CvFAP and only minor amounts were formed in the absence of active illumination (possibly due to the incomplete light-insulation of the reaction vessel). Moreover, no background activity was found in crude extracts prepared from E. coli cells containing an empty vector. 13CH3–CO2H was converted into 13CH4 (Figure S6). Most interestingly, the rate of methane accumulation was almost doubled in the presence of tridecane as decoy molecule, while also the robustness of the reaction increased significantly leading to more than a 3-fold increase of methane yield. The highest acceleration of methane production was achieved in the presence of tetradecane (Figure b). Both in the absence and presence of a decoy molecule, the enzyme reaction rate depended on the concentration of acetic acid (Figure c). In both cases half-maximal rates were obtained at comparable acetic acid concentrations (around 50 mM), suggesting that the decoy molecule did not facilitate the binding of the carboxylic acid but rather increased the enzyme reaction rate. When varying the concentration of the decoy molecule (Figure d), a saturation-type dependency of the reaction rate was observed. Furthermore, at elevated concentrations of the decoy molecule an inhibitory effect was observed, which may be indicative for an ordered mode of binding of substrate and decoy molecule.
Figure 2

Photoenzymatic decarboxylation of acetic acid to methane (A-C). (A) Time course of methane formation performed with (■) and without decoy molecule tridecane (○), and in the absence of CvFAP (▲). Reaction conditions: [decoy molecule] = 15 mM, [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [acetic acid] = 150 mM, Tris–HCl buffer pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, blue light (450 nm). Methane concentration refers to product in the headspace of the reaction vial (4.0 mL of headspace plus 1.0 mL of liquid). (B) Effect of carbon length of decoy alkane on the methane formation. Reaction time: 3h. (C) The rate-dependency of the methane production rate on the acetic acid concentration with (■) and without tridecane (□). Reaction time: 3 h. (D) Turnover number (TON) of CvFAP in the production of butane using nonane as decoy molecule. TON = molbutane × mol–1. The contribution of reaction without using nonane was subtracted. Condition: [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [pentanoic acid] = 150 mM, Tris–HCl buffer pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, 3 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of duplicate experiments (n = 2).

Photoenzymatic decarboxylation of acetic acid to methane (A-C). (A) Time course of methane formation performed with (■) and without decoy molecule tridecane (○), and in the absence of CvFAP (▲). Reaction conditions: [decoy molecule] = 15 mM, [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [acetic acid] = 150 mM, TrisHCl buffer pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, blue light (450 nm). Methane concentration refers to product in the headspace of the reaction vial (4.0 mL of headspace plus 1.0 mL of liquid). (B) Effect of carbon length of decoy alkane on the methane formation. Reaction time: 3h. (C) The rate-dependency of the methane production rate on the acetic acid concentration with (■) and without tridecane (□). Reaction time: 3 h. (D) Turnover number (TON) of CvFAP in the production of butane using nonane as decoy molecule. TON = molbutane × mol–1. The contribution of reaction without using nonane was subtracted. Condition: [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [pentanoic acid] = 150 mM, TrisHCl buffer pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, 3 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of duplicate experiments (n = 2). The rate of the photobiocatalytic decarboxylation reaction was linearly dependent on both the enzyme concentration (Figure S7) and the light intensity (Figure S8). The rate of the reaction in D2O was approximately 1.5 times faster than the same reaction in H2O (Figure S9). This inverse kinetic isotope effect most probably is due to an increased lifetime of the photoexcited flavin cofactor of CvFAP in D2O, as well documented previously for other flavoproteins.[31−33] We interpret these findings with the lifetime of the photoexcited flavin of CvFAP being overall rate-limiting. Encouraged by these promising results, we further evaluated the decarboxylation of a broader range of short-chain carboxylic acids (Table ). The substrate scope of CvFAP was not limited to straight-chain carboxylic acids as also some branched and unsaturated carboxylic acids were converted at significant rates. Decarboxylation of acrylic acid and propionic acid was only possible with the assistance of decoy molecules. Notably, hydrogen gas was formed from the decarboxylation of formic acid. It also becomes clear from Table (and Figures S11–19) that the most suited decoy molecule depends on the carboxylic acid used. In general the number of carbon atoms of substrate and decoy molecule should sum up to 16, which is in line with the previously reported optimal fatty acid chain length.[28] It is also interesting to note that the accelerating effect of the decoy molecule decreased with the chain length of the substrate carboxylic acids.
Table 1

Substrate Scope of the Photobiocatalytic Decarboxylation of Short-Chain Carboxylic Acidsa

Reaction conditions: [decoy molecule] = 7.5 mM, [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [substrate] = 150 mM, Tris–HCl pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, 3 h, blue light (450 nm), photon flux 13.8 μE/Ls. The standard deviation is based on duplicate experiments (n = 2). The concentration refers to product in the headspace of the reaction vial (4.0 mL of headspace plus 1.0 mL of liquid).

Selectivity % = [target product]/([target product]+[other product]) × 100, calculation based on GC.

0.4% propane, 0.038% ethane, 0.01% ethane, 0.2% isopentane and 0.05% propane were observed from Entries 3–7, accordingly.

Reaction was performed at 40 °C.

Reaction conditions: [decoy molecule] = 7.5 mM, [CvFAP] = 6 μM, [substrate] = 150 mM, TrisHCl pH 8.5 (100 mM), 20% DMSO, 30 °C, 3 h, blue light (450 nm), photon flux 13.8 μE/Ls. The standard deviation is based on duplicate experiments (n = 2). The concentration refers to product in the headspace of the reaction vial (4.0 mL of headspace plus 1.0 mL of liquid). Selectivity % = [target product]/([target product]+[other product]) × 100, calculation based on GC. 0.4% propane, 0.038% ethane, 0.01% ethane, 0.2% isopentane and 0.05% propane were observed from Entries 3–7, accordingly. Reaction was performed at 40 °C. The quantum efficiency of the photobiocatalytic decarboxylation reactions was determined. Using acetic acid, butyric acid, pentanoic acid and hexanoic acid, the quantum efficiency (at photon flux 13.8 μE L–1s–1) was 0.008%, 1.3%, 3.2% and 2.7%, respectively (Figure S10). It should be noted that a direct comparison with the numbers reported in the initial report is difficult due to the lack of all necessary data. A further insight into the decarboxylation mechanism was obtained in the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent (TD-DFT) density functional theory (PBE1PBE+D3(BJ)/6-311+G(d,p)+PCM(water)) analysis. These calculations were carried out on a representative model system mimicking the reactive complex of the flavin active site of the FDA and acetate anion as the representative substrate. Our calculations reveal the crucial role of the prearrangement of acetate in the vicinity of the N(5) site of the FAD (CH3COO–···FAD, Figure S32). This van der Waals complex closely resembles the configuration found from the crystal structure analysis shown in Figure . Importantly, in the absence of the confinement caused by the protein residues of CvFAP, an alternative coordination mode dominated by H-bonding between the acetate anion and the N–H moiety of FAD is favored by ca. 20 kJ/mol. However, we were not able to identify a favorable decarboxylation path initiated from this structure, which is in agreement with the lack of decarboxylation activity of the free flavin (Figure S33). When acetate substrate prearrangement is effective, the decarboxylation path starts from the CH3COO–···FAD van der Waals complex exhibiting an absorption maximum at 467 nm.[33] Analysis of the respective frontier orbitals (HOMO, LUMO, Figure S32a) shows that photoexcitation of this molecular complex yields a CH3COO•···FAD• radical pair, from which the decarboxylation of the CH3COO· proceeds rapidly via a highly favorable and low-barrier noncatalytic process. Computational studies propose that the generated CH3 radical further binds the anionic flavin semiquinone resulting in the relaxation of the excited state to the original S0 and the formation of a covalent dearomatized methylquinone flavin adduct. The overall decarboxylation reaction is slightly thermodynamically favorable (ΔGo = −5 kJ·mol–1) allowing thus for a smooth continuation of the catalytic cycle. The flavin adduct intermediate (CH3–FAD−) is then protonated to release the alkane product and regenerate the oxidized FAD closing the catalytic cycle (Figure S32b). Such a reaction pathway is also in agreement with the observed excellent selectivity of the photobiocatalytic decarboxylation reactions with all substrates used. This high selectivity makes the occurrence of free, C-centered radicals (at least for a prolonged period) highly unlikely.

Conclusion

Overall, in the present study we have demonstrated the photobiocatalytic decarboxylation of short-chain carboxylic acids using the fatty acid photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis NC64A (CvFAP). While the wild-type enzyme to some extent can convert also shorter substrates, the use of so-called decoy molecules significantly accelerates the reaction rate. Admittedly, the present reactions showed modest turnover numbers. However, we expect that engineering of both the enzyme and the decoy molecules will further increase the reaction rate and eventually render the CvFAP-catalyzed decarboxylation of a large scope of (waste) carboxylic acids into a viable approach for the generation of light hydrocarbons. Given the recent success in the photodecarboxylation of long fatty acids,[28,34] this work also demonstrates the broad potential of this photodecarboxylase for the application in biofuel synthesis and thus valorization of organic waste streams.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals.

Authors:  Avelino Corma; Sara Iborra; Alexandra Velty
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Renewable energy sources and the realities of setting an energy agenda.

Authors:  Janez Potocnik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Use of perfluorocarboxylic acids to trick cytochrome P450BM3 into initiating the hydroxylation of gaseous alkanes.

Authors:  Norifumi Kawakami; Osami Shoji; Yoshihito Watanabe
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Tuning a p450 enzyme for methane oxidation.

Authors:  Felipe E Zilly; Juan P Acevedo; Wojciech Augustyniak; Alfred Deege; Ulrich W Häusig; Manfred T Reetz
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products.

Authors:  Pierre Gallezot
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 54.564

6.  Zinc-catalyzed chemoselective reduction of esters to alcohols.

Authors:  Shoubhik Das; Konstanze Möller; Kathrin Junge; Matthias Beller
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Selective reduction of carboxylic acid derivatives by catalytic hydrosilylation.

Authors:  Daniele Addis; Shoubhik Das; Kathrin Junge; Matthias Beller
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Reduction of carboxylic acids by Nocardia aldehyde oxidoreductase requires a phosphopantetheinylated enzyme.

Authors:  Padmesh Venkitasubramanian; Lacy Daniels; John P N Rosazza
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Hydrogen bond switching among flavin and amino acid side chains in the BLUF photoreceptor observed by ultrafast infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Cosimo Bonetti; Tilo Mathes; Ivo H M van Stokkum; Katharine M Mullen; Marie-Louise Groot; Rienk van Grondelle; Peter Hegemann; John T M Kennis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Zinc-catalyzed reduction of amides: unprecedented selectivity and functional group tolerance.

Authors:  Shoubhik Das; Daniele Addis; Shaolin Zhou; Kathrin Junge; Matthias Beller
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  11 in total

1.  Promoter engineering for microbial bio-alkane gas production.

Authors:  Duangthip Trisrivirat; John M X Hughes; Robin Hoeven; Matthew Faulkner; Helen Toogood; Pimchai Chaiyen; Nigel S Scrutton
Journal:  Synth Biol (Oxf)       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Photoinduced Covalent Irreversible Inactivation of Proline Dehydrogenase by S-Heterocycles.

Authors:  Ashley C Campbell; Austin R Prater; Alexandra N Bogner; Thomas P Quinn; Kent S Gates; Donald F Becker; John J Tanner
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Photobiocatalytic synthesis of chiral secondary fatty alcohols from renewable unsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  Wuyuan Zhang; Jeong-Hoo Lee; Sabry H H Younes; Fabio Tonin; Peter-Leon Hagedoorn; Harald Pichler; Yoonjin Baeg; Jin-Byung Park; Robert Kourist; Frank Hollmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Photoinduced monooxygenation involving NAD(P)H-FAD sequential single-electron transfer.

Authors:  Simon Ernst; Stefano Rovida; Andrea Mattevi; Susanne Fetzner; Steffen L Drees
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Engineering nature for gaseous hydrocarbon production.

Authors:  Mohamed Amer; Helen Toogood; Nigel S Scrutton
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Light-Driven Enzymatic Decarboxylation of Dicarboxylic Acids.

Authors:  Yong-Yi Zeng; Lan Liu; Bi-Shuang Chen; Wuyuan Zhang
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Quaternary Charge-Transfer Complex Enables Photoenzymatic Intermolecular Hydroalkylation of Olefins.

Authors:  Claire G Page; Simon J Cooper; Jacob S DeHovitz; Daniel G Oblinsky; Kyle F Biegasiewicz; Alyssa H Antropow; Kurt W Armbrust; J Michael Ellis; Lawrence G Hamann; Evan J Horn; Kevin M Oberg; Gregory D Scholes; Todd K Hyster
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Light-driven decarboxylative deuteration enabled by a divergently engineered photodecarboxylase.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Jiajie Fan; Yujiao Lou; Weihua Xu; Zhiguo Wang; Danyang Li; Haonan Zhou; Xianfu Lin; Qi Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Continuous photoproduction of hydrocarbon drop-in fuel by microbial cell factories.

Authors:  Solène Moulin; Bertrand Légeret; Stéphanie Blangy; Damien Sorigué; Adrien Burlacot; Pascaline Auroy; Yonghua Li-Beisson; Gilles Peltier; Fred Beisson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stabilisation of the Fatty Acid Decarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis by Caprylic Acid.

Authors:  Yinqi Wu; Caroline E Paul; Frank Hollmann
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.