Literature DB >> 30671794

Prevalence and Predictors of Unnecessary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Two-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Hyun Woo Lee1, Do Hyun Park2, Jae Hoon Lee3, Dong Wook Oh4, Tae Jun Song4, Sang Soo Lee4, Dong-Wan Seo4, Sung Koo Lee4, Myung-Hwan Kim4, Ji Eun Moon5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: A two-stage procedure involving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), followed by cholecystectomy, is one of the primary treatments of concomitant gallstones and choledocholithiasis. However, negative findings on ERCP and migrating gallstones after cholecystectomy are major concerns. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of unnecessary ERCP and to develop and validate a predictive nomogram using preoperative factors in patients who underwent a two-stage procedure.
METHODS: Consecutive 931 patients were treated with the two-stage procedure for evident gallstones and suspected choledocholithiasis. After the cholecystectomy, a cholangiogram was performed to confirm the absence of the migrating gallstones. The patients were divided into derivation (n = 652) and validation (n = 279) cohorts.
RESULTS: A total of 26.5% (247/931) patients had unnecessary ERCP (negative choledocholithiasis, 14.6%; migrating gallstones, 11.9%). No stones on images (P < 0.001), total bilirubin < 1.2 mg/dL (P = 0.006), and common bile duct diameter < 8.0 mm (P = 0.004) were independent factors associated with negative finding on ERCP with a validated nomogram area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.80). For migrating gallstones after cholecystectomy, radiolucent gallstones (P < 0.001), gallstone size ≤ 6.4 mm (P = 0.001), cystic duct stones (P < 0.001), gallbladder wall thickness ≥ 3.2 mm (P = 0.003), and low-lying cystic duct (P < 0.001) were independent factors with a validated nomogram AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: About one fourth of the patients may have unnecessary ERCP in the two-stage procedure. Based on our nomogram using preoperative factors, high-risk patients who are more likely to perform unnecessary ERCP could be considered for the one-stage procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Gallstones; Two-stage procedure

Year:  2019        PMID: 30671794     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  32 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery and the common bile duct.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; G C Gardner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  R Riciardi; S Islam; J J Canete; P L Arcand; M E Stoker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Sum P Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Classification and nomenclature of gallstones revisited.

Authors:  In Sook Kim; Seung-Jae Myung; Sang-Soo Lee; Sung-Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Donald Garrow; Scott Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Jason Conway; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; E Patchen Dellinger; Allen Cheadle; Leighton Chan; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic).

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Kohut; E Nowakowska-Duława; T Marek; R Kaczor; A Nowak
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Role of liver function tests in predicting common bile duct stones in acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  W K Peng; Z Sheikh; S Paterson-Brown; S J Nixon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.