Literature DB >> 30667607

Inpatient electronic health record maintenance from 2010 to 2015.

Vincent X Liu1, Nimah Haq, Ignatius C Chan, Brian Hoberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the scale and scope of inpatient electronic health record (EHR) maintenance following initial implementation. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study reviewing EHR change documentation within an integrated healthcare delivery system that has 21 hospitals.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, we identified and categorized all significant changes made to the inpatient EHR, as documented within monthly EHR communication updates. We categorized EHR changes as updates to existing functionality or upgrades to new functionality. We grouped changes within larger functional domains as orders, alerts and customization, surgical and emergency department (ED), data review, reports and health information management, and other. We also identified the clinical areas and user roles targeted by these changes.
RESULTS: Over a 6-year period, 5551 unique changes were made to the inpatient EHR, with a median of 72 changes per month. Changes most frequently targeted orders (44.7% of 2190 change documents) and order sets (29.9% of documents). In total, changes affected 135 EHR functions. A total of 151 unique user roles were affected by these changes, with the most frequent roles including nurses (30.6%), physicians (26.6%), and other clinical staff (22.7%). The clinical areas most targeted by changes included surgical areas and the ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Over 6 years, EHR maintenance for clinical functionality was substantial and varied with pervasive impacts, requiring persistent attention, diverse expertise, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30667607      PMCID: PMC6596284     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  28 in total

Review 1.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.

Authors:  Lynda C Burton; Gerard F Anderson; Irvin W Kues
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Jordan Everson; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study.

Authors:  Stewart Babbott; Linda Baier Manwell; Roger Brown; Enid Montague; Eric Williams; Mark Schwartz; Erik Hess; Mark Linzer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Launching HITECH.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.

Authors:  Raj M Ratwani; Rollin J Fairbanks; A Zachary Hettinger; Natalie C Benda
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Electronic Health Records Associated With Lower Hospital Mortality After Systems Have Time To Mature.

Authors:  Sunny C Lin; Ashish K Jha; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.

Authors:  Marc A Ellsworth; Mikhail Dziadzko; John C O'Horo; Ann M Farrell; Jiajie Zhang; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Reed; Jie Huang; Ilana Graetz; Richard Brand; John Hsu; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Challenges to EHR implementation in electronic- versus paper-based office practices.

Authors:  Stephanie O Zandieh; Kahyun Yoon-Flannery; Gilad J Kuperman; Daniel J Langsam; Daniel Hyman; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.