BACKGROUND: Physicians can receive federal payments for meaningful use of complete certified electronic health records (EHRs). Evidence is limited on how EHR use affects clinical care and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between use of a commercially available certified EHR and clinical care processes and disease control in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design with outpatient EHR implementation sequentially across 17 medical centers. Multivariate analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, medical center, time trends, and facility-level clustering. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated delivery system. PATIENTS: 169 711 patients with diabetes mellitus. INTERVENTION: Use of a commercially available certified EHR. MEASUREMENTS: Drug treatment intensification and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) testing and values. RESULTS: Use of an EHR was associated with statistically significant improvements in treatment intensification after HbA(1c) values of 9% or greater (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.15]) or LDL-C values of 2.6 to 3.3 mmol/L (100 to 129 mg/dL) (odds ratio, 1.06 [CI, 1.00 to 1.12]); increases in 1-year retesting for HbA(1c) and LDL-C levels among all patients, with the most dramatic change among patients with the worst disease control (HbA(1c) levels ≥9% or LDL-C levels ≥3.4 mmol/L [≥130 mg/dL]); and decreased 90-day retesting among patients with HbA(1c) levels less than 7% or LDL-C levels less than 2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL). The EHR was also associated with statistically significant reductions in HbA(1c) and LDL-C levels, with the largest reductions among patients with the worst control (0.06-mmol/L [2.19-mg/dL] reduction among patients with baseline LDL-C levels ≥3.4 mmol/L [≥130 mg/dL]; P < 0.001). LIMITATION: The EHR was implemented in a setting with strong baseline performance on cardiovascular care quality measures. CONCLUSION: Use of a commercially available certified EHR was associated with improved drug treatment intensification, monitoring, and physiologic control among patients with diabetes, with greater improvements among patients with worse control and less testing in patients already meeting guideline-recommended glycemic and lipid targets. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
BACKGROUND: Physicians can receive federal payments for meaningful use of complete certified electronic health records (EHRs). Evidence is limited on how EHR use affects clinical care and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between use of a commercially available certified EHR and clinical care processes and disease control in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design with outpatient EHR implementation sequentially across 17 medical centers. Multivariate analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, medical center, time trends, and facility-level clustering. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated delivery system. PATIENTS: 169 711 patients with diabetes mellitus. INTERVENTION: Use of a commercially available certified EHR. MEASUREMENTS: Drug treatment intensification and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) testing and values. RESULTS: Use of an EHR was associated with statistically significant improvements in treatment intensification after HbA(1c) values of 9% or greater (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.15]) or LDL-C values of 2.6 to 3.3 mmol/L (100 to 129 mg/dL) (odds ratio, 1.06 [CI, 1.00 to 1.12]); increases in 1-year retesting for HbA(1c) and LDL-C levels among all patients, with the most dramatic change among patients with the worst disease control (HbA(1c) levels ≥9% or LDL-C levels ≥3.4 mmol/L [≥130 mg/dL]); and decreased 90-day retesting among patients with HbA(1c) levels less than 7% or LDL-C levels less than 2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL). The EHR was also associated with statistically significant reductions in HbA(1c) and LDL-C levels, with the largest reductions among patients with the worst control (0.06-mmol/L [2.19-mg/dL] reduction among patients with baseline LDL-C levels ≥3.4 mmol/L [≥130 mg/dL]; P < 0.001). LIMITATION: The EHR was implemented in a setting with strong baseline performance on cardiovascular care quality measures. CONCLUSION: Use of a commercially available certified EHR was associated with improved drug treatment intensification, monitoring, and physiologic control among patients with diabetes, with greater improvements among patients with worse control and less testing in patients already meeting guideline-recommended glycemic and lipid targets. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
Authors: Kaveh G Shojania; Sumant R Ranji; Kathryn M McDonald; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Vandana Sundaram; Robert J Rushakoff; Douglas K Owens Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-07-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Li Zhou; Christine S Soran; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; E John Orav; David W Bates; Steven R Simon Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mukul Sharma; Mohammed T Ansari; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Karla Soares-Weiser; Teik Chye Ooi; Margaret Sears; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; David Moher Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Patrick J O'Connor; A Lauren Crain; William A Rush; Joann M Sperl-Hillen; Jay J Gutenkauf; Jane E Duncan Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jeph Herrin; Briget da Graca; David Nicewander; Cliff Fullerton; Phil Aponte; Greg Stanek; Terianne Cowling; Ashley Collinsworth; Neil S Fleming; David J Ballard Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Carol M Mangione; Robert B Gerzoff; David F Williamson; W Neil Steers; Eve A Kerr; Arleen F Brown; Beth E Waitzfelder; David G Marrero; R Adams Dudley; Catherine Kim; William Herman; Theodore J Thompson; Monika M Safford; Joe V Selby Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joseph V Selby; Connie S Uratsu; Bruce Fireman; Julie A Schmittdiel; Tiffany Peng; Nicolas Rodondi; Andrew J Karter; Eve A Kerr Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mary Reed; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Ilana Graetz; Romain Neugebauer; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe; Dustin W Ballard; John Hsu Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Neil S Fleming; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; Dunlei Cheng; Russell McCorkle; Briget da Graca; David J Ballard Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alice P S Kong; Gang Xu; Nicola Brown; Wing-Yee So; Ronald C W Ma; Juliana C N Chan Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 43.330