Literature DB >> 26395278

Length of capsular contact for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on prostate MRI: Assessment at an optimal threshold.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Alampady K Shanbhogue1, Annie Wang1, Max Xiangtian Kong2, James S Babb1, Samir S Taneja3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the length of capsular contact of dominant lesions on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) and to determine a threshold value to apply in clinical practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing 3T prostate MRI before prostatectomy were included. Two independent readers (R1, R2) recorded for each lobe the presence or absence of capsular irregularity on T2 -weighted imaging (T2 WI) and of overt measurable EPE. Readers also recorded the length of capsular contact of each lobe's dominant lesion for T2 WI and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Based on prostatectomy specimens, EPE was recorded for each lobe and classified as focal (single focus ≤0.5 mm in depth) vs. established. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, logistic regression, and kappa coefficients were used to assess interpretive approaches on a side-specific basis.
RESULTS: The optimal thresholds were 6 mm and 7 mm of contact using T2 WI and ADC for any EPE, and 10 mm and 7 mm using T2 WI and ADC for nonfocal EPE (AUCs 81.0-82.5%). Capsular contact had higher sensitivity, yet lower specificity, than subjective interpretations for any EPE and for nonfocal EPE (all P ≤ 0.018, aside from any EPE for R2 using ADC). Length of contact exhibited more substantial gains in sensitivity (9-20% for any EPE; 34-41% for nonfocal EPE) than losses in specificity (6-13% for any EPE; 17-27% for nonfocal EPE) compared with subjective interpretations. Interreader agreement: 0.70 for assessments based on length of contact; 0.49-0.59 for subjective assessments.
CONCLUSION: Length of capsular contact of dominant lesions can improve interreader agreement and sensitivity for EPE compared with subjective features, with relatively mild specificity loss.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; diffusion-weighted imaging; prostate cancer; staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26395278     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  28 in total

1.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.

Authors:  Borna K Barth; Pieter J L De Visschere; Alexander Cornelius; Carlos Nicolau; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luke A Ginocchio; Daniel Cornfeld; Adam T Froemming; Rajan T Gupta; Baris Turkbey; Antonio C Westphalen; James S Babb; Daniel J Margolis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Drew Moghanaki; Baris Turkbey; Neha Vapiwala; Behfar Ehdaie; Steven J Frank; Patrick W McLaughlin; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Locally advanced prostate cancer imaging findings and implications for treatment from the surgical perspective.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Vishnupriya Kuchana; Rizwan Aslam; Ashish Kamat; Priya R Bhosale; A R Klekers
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

Review 6.  Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Alice C Shieh; Ezgi Guler; Vijayanadh Ojili; Raj Mohan Paspulati; Robin Elliott; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: An intraindividual assessment of the effect of temporal resolution on qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of histopathologically proven prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin M Ream; Ankur M Doshi; Diane Dunst; Nainesh Parikh; Max X Kong; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Assessing Extraprostatic Extension with Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: Mehralivand Extraprostatic Extension Grade or Extraprostatic Extension Likert Scale?

Authors:  Lars A R Reisæter; Ole J Halvorsen; Christian Beisland; Alfred Honoré; Karsten Gravdal; Are Losnegård; Jan Monssen; Lars A Akslen; Martin Biermann
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17

9.  Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hyungwoo Ahn; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Hyoung Sim Suh; Gheeyoung Choe; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Kyu Hong; Sangchul Lee; Joongyub Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.