Literature DB >> 34018011

Artificial intelligence is a promising prospect for the detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with mpMRI: a two-center comparative study.

Ying Hou1, Yi-Hong Zhang2, Jie Bao3, Mei-Ling Bao4, Guang Yang2, Hai-Bin Shi1, Yang Song5, Yu-Dong Zhang6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A balance between preserving urinary continence as well as sexual potency and achieving negative surgical margins is of clinical relevance while implementary difficulty. Accurate detection of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer (PCa) is thus crucial for determining appropriate treatment options. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for detecting ECE of PCa using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
METHODS: Eight hundred and forty nine consecutive PCa patients who underwent mpMRI and prostatectomy without previous radio- or hormonal therapy from two medical centers were retrospectively included. The AI tool was built on a ResNeXt network embedded with a spatial attention map of experts' prior knowledge (PAGNet) from 596 training patients. Model validation was performed in 150 internal and 103 external patients. Performance comparison was made between AI, two experts using a criteria-based ECE grading system, and expert-AI interaction.
RESULTS: An index PAGNet model using a single-slice image yielded the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.857 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.827-0.884), 0.807 (95% CI, 0.735-0.867), and 0.728 (95% CI, 0.631-0.811) in training, internal, and external validation data, respectively. The performance of two experts (AUC, 0.632 to 0.741 vs 0.715 to 0.857) was lower (paired comparison, all p values < 0.05) than that of AI assessment. When experts' interpretations were adjusted by AI assessments, the performance of two experts was improved.
CONCLUSION: Our AI tool, showing improved accuracy, offers a promising alternative to human experts for ECE staging using mpMRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Extracapsular extension; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate neoplasm

Year:  2021        PMID: 34018011     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05381-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

1.  [Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer--a multi-institutional update].

Authors:  Markus Graefen
Journal:  Aktuelle Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.658

2.  Endorectal MRI of prostate cancer: incremental prognostic importance of gross locally advanced disease.

Authors:  Valdair F Muglia; Antonio C Westphalen; Zhen J Wang; John Kurhanewicz; Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Jonathan I Epstein; Roman Ganzer; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Jihad Kaouk; Mani Menon; Alexandre Mottrie; Robert P Myers; Vipul Patel; Ashutosh Tewari; Arnauld Villers; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The Incremental Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Staging before Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Morlacco; Vidit Sharma; Boyd R Viers; Laureano J Rangel; Rachel E Carlson; Adam T Froemming; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Guillaume Ploussard; Massimo Valerio; Agostino Mattei; Cristian Fiori; Mathieu Roumiguié; Nicola Fossati; Armando Stabile; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Bernard Malavaud; Simone Scuderi; Francesco Barletta; Marco Moschini; Stefania Zamboni; Arnas Rakauskas; Zhe Tian; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The relationship between the extent of extraprostatic extension and survival following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Heather J Chalfin; Seung Bae Lee; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Elizabeth Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laura N Nguyen; Linden Head; Kelsey Witiuk; Nahid Punjani; Ranjeeta Mallick; Sonya Cnossen; Dean A Fergusson; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallée; Christopher Morash; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Gosselaar; R Kranse; M J Roobol; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011.

Authors:  John B Eifler; Zhaoyang Feng; Brian M Lin; Michael T Partin; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Machine learning-based radiomics for multiple primary prostate cancer biological characteristics prediction with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET: comparison among different volume segmentation thresholds.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Yunjun Yang; Fei Yao; Shuying Bian; Dongqin Zhu; Yaping Yuan; Kehua Pan; Zhifang Pan; Xianghao Feng
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 2.  More than Meets the Eye: Using Textural Analysis and Artificial Intelligence as Decision Support Tools in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Teodora Telecan; Iulia Andras; Nicolae Crisan; Lorin Giurgiu; Emanuel Darius Căta; Cosmin Caraiani; Andrei Lebovici; Bianca Boca; Zoltan Balint; Laura Diosan; Monica Lupsor-Platon
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Quality in MR reporting (include improvements in acquisition using AI).

Authors:  Liang Wang; Daniel J Margolis; Min Chen; Xinming Zhao; Qiubai Li; Zhenghan Yang; Jie Tian; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Current Value of Biparametric Prostate MRI with Machine-Learning or Deep-Learning in the Detection, Grading, and Characterization of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Giacomo Aringhieri; Dania Cioni; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Computational Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ştefania L Moroianu; Indrani Bhattacharya; Arun Seetharaman; Wei Shao; Christian A Kunder; Avishkar Sharma; Pejman Ghanouni; Richard E Fan; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.