Literature DB >> 30666427

Incidence and contributing factors of perioperative complications in surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Hanan Alshankiti1,2, Sara Houlihan3,4, Magali Robert3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence of perioperative complications of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and their contributing factors are limited, sometimes conflicting, and often mixed with other urogynecologic surgeries.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence and contributing factors for perioperative complications of POP procedures.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out between November 2016 and June 2017. POP procedures of different approaches were included irrespective of the surgeon involved, type of surgery (primary or repeat), or concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence repair. Data on perioperative complications were recorded prospectively.
RESULTS: A total of 366 women were included in the current analysis. The average age was 61.0 ± 13.4 years. The surgical procedures performed were vaginal (75.3%), abdominal (11.3%), or combined (13.4%). Approximately 18.2% of these procedures were repeat surgeries. A total of 38 (11.3%) women developed perioperative complications (3.6% severe and 7.7% minor). These included: 25 (7.4%) intraoperative complications (2.4% severe and 5.1% minor) and 17 (5.1%) postoperative complications (2.1% severe and 3.0% minor). In multivariate analysis, abdominal surgery and McCall culdoplasty were significant predictors of intraoperative complications (alone or when combined with other postoperative complications). On the other hand, concomitant hysterectomy and concomitant incontinence repair procedure were associated with higher postoperative complication rates while vaginal surgery had fewer postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: There was a low rate of perioperative complications. Abdominal surgery and McCall culdoplasty showed higher intraoperative complications. These data should help in preoperative counseling and target ways to further decrease complication rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incidence; Pelvic organ prolapse; Surgical complications; Urogynecology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30666427     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03873-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  27 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Robert Freeman; Matthew Barber; Christopher Maher; Bernard Haylen; Stavros Athanasiou; Steven Swift; Kristene Whitmore; Gamal Ghoniem; Dirk de Ridder
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections.

Authors:  K M Luber; S Boero; J Y Choe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention.

Authors:  Michele Carlo Schiavi; Delia Savone; Daniele Di Mascio; Chiara Di Tucci; Giorgia Perniola; Marzio Angelo Zullo; Ludovico Muzii; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Prevalence of perioperative complications among women undergoing reconstructive pelvic surgery.

Authors:  N C Lambrou; J L Buller; J R Thompson; G W Cundiff; B Chou; F J Montz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Mirhashemi; B L Harlow; E S Ginsburg; L B Signorello; R Berkowitz; S Feldman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Federico Spelzini; Matteo Frigerio; Stefano Manodoro; Maria Lieta Interdonato; Maria Cristina Cesana; Debora Verri; Caterina Fumagalli; Martina Sicuri; Elena Nicoli; Serena Polizzi; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tineke F M Vergeldt; Mirjam Weemhoff; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.