Literature DB >> 30665694

Anisotropic Material Properties of Wild-Type and Tectb-/- Tectorial Membranes.

Charlsie Lemons1, Jonathan B Sellon2, Elisa Boatti1, Daniel Filizzola2, Dennis M Freeman3, Julien Meaud4.   

Abstract

The tectorial membrane (TM) is an extracellular matrix that is directly coupled with the mechanoelectrical receptors responsible for sensory transduction and amplification. As such, the TM is often hypothesized to play a key role in the remarkable sensory abilities of the mammalian cochlea. Genetic studies targeting TM proteins have shown that changes in TM structure dramatically affect cochlear function in mice. Precise information about the mechanical properties of the TMs of wild-type and mutant mice at audio frequencies is required to elucidate the role of the TM and to understand how these genetic mutations affect cochlear mechanics. In this study, images of isolated TM segments are used to determine both the radial and longitudinal motions of the TM in response to a harmonic radial excitation. The resulting longitudinally propagating radial displacement and highly spatially dependent longitudinal displacement are modeled using finite-element models that take into account the anisotropy and finite dimensions of TMs. An automated, least-square fitting algorithm is used to find the anisotropic material properties of wild-type and Tectb-/- mice at audio frequencies. Within the auditory frequency range, it is found that the TM is a highly viscoelastic and anisotropic structure with significantly higher stiffness in the direction of the collagen fibers. Although no decrease in the stiffness in the fiber direction is observed, the stiffness of the TM in shear and in the transverse direction is found to be significantly reduced in Tectb-/- mice. As a result, TMs of the mutant mice tend to be significantly more anisotropic within the frequency range examined in this study. The effects of the Tectb-/- mutation on the TM's anisotropic material properties may be responsible for the changes in cochlear tuning and sensitivity that have been previously reported for these mice.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30665694      PMCID: PMC6369431          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of isolated tectorial membrane using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Rachel Gueta; David Barlam; Roni Z Shneck; Itay Rousso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tectorial membrane stiffness gradients.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Gulam Emadi; Geoffrey Getnick; Alicia Quesnel; Peter Dallos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The 3D structure of the tectorial membrane determined by second-harmonic imaging microscopy.

Authors:  Rachel Gueta; Eran Tal; Yaron Silberberg; Itay Rousso
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Roozbeh Ghaffari; Alexander J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ultrastructural organization of proteoglycans and fibrillar matrix of the tectorial membrane.

Authors:  V Tsuprun; P Santi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Tectorial membrane. II: Stiffness measurements in vivo.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; L K Cefaratti
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Jesung Park; Audrey K Ellerbee; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix.

Authors:  J A Hasko; G P Richardson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Modified protein expression in the tectorial membrane of the cochlea reveals roles for the striated sheet matrix.

Authors:  Gareth P Jones; Stephen J Elliott; Ian J Russell; Andrei N Lukashkin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Consequences of Location-Dependent Organ of Corti Micro-Mechanics.

Authors:  Yanju Liu; Sheryl M Gracewski; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Yi Wang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Reducing tectorial membrane viscoelasticity enhances spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and compromises the detection of low level sound.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Charlsie Lemons; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  The interplay of organ-of-Corti vibrational modes, not tectorial- membrane resonance, sets outer-hair-cell stereocilia phase to produce cochlear amplification.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are biomarkers for mice with tectorial membrane defects.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.