BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia may be impaired at remembering interitem and item-context relationships (relational memory), even when memory for items is intact. Here, we applied the novel approach of using eye movements to assess integrity of item and relational memory in schizophrenia. This method does not rely on introspection and may be more readily translated to animal models than traditional behavioral methods. METHODS: Sixteen healthy control subjects and 16 patients were administered a scene memory task while eye movements were monitored. During testing, participants indicated whether the scenes were unchanged, contained a new item (item manipulation), had a change in item location (relational manipulation), or were new. It was predicted that memory would be disproportionately impaired when relational changes were made. RESULTS: Results confirmed that tasks were equally difficult and showed that patients were impaired identifying all scene types. These behavioral impairments were associated with more severe disorganization and negative symptoms. Eye movement results were more specific. Both groups looked disproportionately at critical regions of repeated versus novel scenes-an effect of scene repetition. However, in contrast with predictions, patients showed equivalent eye-movement-based memory impairment whether changes were relational or item-based. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first experiment to demonstrate that eye movements can be used to investigate item and relational memory in schizophrenia. The eye movement procedure was well tolerated and was more specific than behavioral measures with respect to memory impairment. Results suggest that eye movements may be of use in clinical trials and translational studies employing animal models.
BACKGROUND:Patients with schizophrenia may be impaired at remembering interitem and item-context relationships (relational memory), even when memory for items is intact. Here, we applied the novel approach of using eye movements to assess integrity of item and relational memory in schizophrenia. This method does not rely on introspection and may be more readily translated to animal models than traditional behavioral methods. METHODS: Sixteen healthy control subjects and 16 patients were administered a scene memory task while eye movements were monitored. During testing, participants indicated whether the scenes were unchanged, contained a new item (item manipulation), had a change in item location (relational manipulation), or were new. It was predicted that memory would be disproportionately impaired when relational changes were made. RESULTS: Results confirmed that tasks were equally difficult and showed that patients were impaired identifying all scene types. These behavioral impairments were associated with more severe disorganization and negative symptoms. Eye movement results were more specific. Both groups looked disproportionately at critical regions of repeated versus novel scenes-an effect of scene repetition. However, in contrast with predictions, patients showed equivalent eye-movement-based memory impairment whether changes were relational or item-based. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first experiment to demonstrate that eye movements can be used to investigate item and relational memory in schizophrenia. The eye movement procedure was well tolerated and was more specific than behavioral measures with respect to memory impairment. Results suggest that eye movements may be of use in clinical trials and translational studies employing animal models.
Authors: Martin Lepage; Alonso Montoya; Marc Pelletier; Amélie M Achim; Matthew Menear; Samarthji Lal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-06-30 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Theo G M van Erp; Tyler A Lesh; Barbara J Knowlton; Carrie E Bearden; Molly Hardt; Katherine H Karlsgodt; David Shirinyan; Vikas Rao; Michael F Green; Kenneth L Subotnik; Keith Nuechterlein; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Anthony P Weiss; Donald C Goff; Margaret Duff; Joshua L Roffman; Daniel L Schacter Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John D Ragland; Charan Ranganath; Deanna M Barch; James M Gold; Brittaney Haley; Angus W MacDonald; Steven M Silverstein; Milton E Strauss; Andrew P Yonelinas; Cameron S Carter Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Suzanne N Avery; Kristan Armstrong; Jennifer U Blackford; Neil D Woodward; Neal Cohen; Stephan Heckers Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John D Ragland; Robert S Blumenfeld; Ian S Ramsay; Andrew Yonelinas; Jong Yoon; Marjorie Solomon; Cameron S Carter; Charan Ranganath Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Deborah E Hannula; Robert R Althoff; David E Warren; Lily Riggs; Neal J Cohen; Jennifer D Ryan Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Suzanne N Avery; Kristan Armstrong; Maureen McHugo; Simon Vandekar; Jennifer Urbano Blackford; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 9.306