| Literature DB >> 30663181 |
Masahiro Shibata1,2, Yasuko Hikino2, Mai Imanari3, Kazunori Matsumoto2.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of a system for fattening steers combining grazing with feeding rice whole-crop silage (rWCS) on growth performance, meat characteristics, and the expression of genes involved in skeletal muscle growth. Steers were randomly assigned to grazing or concentrate-fed groups (CT). The grazing group (GZ) was fed rWCS after grazing until 16 months of age. The final body weight was the same in the two groups, but the dressed weight was lower in the GZ than in the CT. The beef color standard was higher in the GZ than in the CT. Although beef marbling did not differ between the two groups, there was less intramuscular fat and subcutaneous fat in the GZ than in the CT. The α-tocopherol and β-carotene contents in the muscle were higher in the GZ than in the CT. The GZ showed a lower daily gain (DG) during the grazing period, which may have resulted from decelerating skeletal muscle growth caused by the increased expression of genes encoding myostatin and atrogin-1. However, the DG and feed efficiency of the GZ increased after grazing. The two groups exhibited a similar level of beef productivity.Entities:
Keywords: beef productivity; carcass and meat characteristics; gene expression; grazing; rice whole-crop silage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30663181 PMCID: PMC8243347 DOI: 10.1111/asj.13176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Sci J ISSN: 1344-3941 Impact factor: 1.749
Variation in the mass and nutritional composition of grass during the period of grazing
| Period (month) | Grass mass (kg of DM/ha) | TDN (% of DM) | CP (% of DM) | ADF (% of DM) | NDF (% of DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–11 | 1,759 | 76.0 | 21.6 | 18.3 | 41.2 |
| 11–12 | 2,093 | 71.3 | 17.0 | 18.6 | 39.8 |
| 12–13 | 3,705 | 72.2 | 20.9 | 20.5 | 49.0 |
| 13–14 | 4,090 | 72.8 | 12.7 | 25.0 | 49.2 |
| 14–15 | 2,715 | 72.7 | 12.8 | 25.9 | 48.9 |
| 15–16 | 4,444 | 70.9 | 8.8 | 36.0 | 62.0 |
TDN: total digestible nutrients; CP: crude protein; ADF: acid detergent fiber; NDF: neutral detergent fiber.
aPeriod: age of steers in months, 10–13 months; winter, 13–16 months; spring.
Nutritional composition of rice whole‐crop silage
| TDN (% of DM) | CP (% of DM) | ADF (% of DM) | NDF (% of DM) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice whole‐crop silage | 57.2 | 6.01 | 33.6 | 57.2 |
TDN: total digestible nutrients; CP: crude protein; ADF: acid detergent fiber; NDF: neutral detergent fiber.
Sequences of real‐time PCR primers used in this studya
| Gene | GenBank accession no. | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) | Product size, bp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| AB076403 | GGCCATGATCTTGCTGTAACCT | GCATCGAGATTCTGTGGAGTG | 144 |
|
| NM1046155 | GTTGTACGGCTGTTGGAACTGA | GCAGGAGCTCCCTTATTAGTC | 148 |
|
| U85042 | TGACCCCTTCATTGACCTTCA | ACCCCAGTGGACTCCACTACAT | 201 |
aAll sequence data are bovine sequences. bGAPDH, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase.
Growth performance and feed intake of steers (GZ, grazed group; CT, concentrate‐fed group)
| GZ | CT | |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (BW), kg | ||
| Before grazing (10 month) | 331 ± 7.97 | 328 ± 11.4 |
| After grazing (16 month) | 469 ± 14.1 | 507 ± 13.5 |
| Middle (22 month) | 661 ± 6.43 | 647 ± 10.6 |
| Final (28 month) | 705 ± 9.14 | 728 ± 8.66 |
| Daily gain, kg/day | ||
| Grazing period (10–16 months) | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 0.99 ± 0.05 |
| WCS feeding period (16–28 months) | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.02 |
| WCS feeding Period 1 (16–22 months) | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.71 ± 0.02 |
| WCS feeding Period 2 (22–28 months) | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.05 |
| TDN intake, kg/day | ||
| Grazing period | 6.20 ± 0.15 | |
| WCS feeding period | 6.14 ± 0.74 | 6.01 ± 0.19 |
| WCS feeding Period 1 | 6.98 ± 0.08 | 6.05 ± 0.17 |
| WCS feeding Period 2 | 5.09 ± 0.15 | 5.99 ± 0.25 |
| Feed efficiency, BW gain/TDN intake | ||
| Grazing period | 0.159 ± 0.005 | |
| WCS feeding period | 0.109 ± 0.003 | 0.107 ± 0.002 |
| WCS feeding Period 1 | 0.140 ± 0.006 | 0.118 ± 0.002 |
| WCS feeding Period 2 | 0.055 ± 0.005 | 0.093 ± 0.007 |
Values are Ms ± SEM.
TDN: total digestible nutrients.
*p < 0.05, # p < 0.10.
Carcass characteristics of steers (GZ, grazed group; CT, concentrate‐fed group)
| GZ | CT | |
|---|---|---|
| Dressed weight, kg | 423 ± 6.13 | 459 ± 4.94 |
| Dressing percentage, % | 72.2 ± 0.40 | 71.8 ± 0.12 |
| Rib eye area, cm2 | 46.0 ± 2.05 | 51.2 ± 1.59 |
| Rib thickness, cm | 7.16 ± 0.30 | 7.32 ± 0.14 |
| Subcutaneous fat thickness, cm | 2.98 ± 0.25 | 3.86 ± 0.20 |
| Beef marbling standard, No. | 3.4 ± 0.25 | 3.2 ± 0.20 |
| Beef color standard, No. | 4.8 ± 0.20 | 3.8 ± 0.20 |
| Beef fat color standard, No. | 5.8 ± 0.20 | 3.0 ± 0.00 |
Values are Ms ± SEM.
*p < 0.05, # p < 0.10.
Nutrient contents, vitamin contents, water‐holding capacity, and Warner–Bratzler shear force in the M. longissimus lumborum (LL) and M. semitendinosus (ST) muscles of steers (GZ, grazed group; CT, concentrate‐fed group)
| LL | ST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GZ | CT | GZ | CT | |
| Crude protein, % | 18.2 ± 0.48 | 16.6 ± 0.58 | 20.8 ± 0.20 | 19.8 ± 0.55 |
| Extract lipid, % | 21.7 ± 1.74 | 27.2 ± 1.62 | 6.38 ± 0.55 | 9.86 ± 1.63 |
| Moisture, % | 59.5 ± 1.33 | 55.4 ± 1.22 | 71.8 ± 0.40 | 69.4 ± 1.07 |
| Vitamin | ||||
| Retinol, μg/100 g | 26.2 ± 3.01 | 21.9 ± 0.87 | 7.00 ± 0.71 | 8.52 ± 1.75 |
| β‐Carotene, μg/100 g | 21.0 ± 3.27 | 3.20 ± 1.10 | 8.80 ± 0.49 | 1.05 ± 0.05 |
| α‐Tocopherol, mg/kg | 17.2 ± 1.02 | 3.35 ± 0.79 | 12.1 ± 0.48 | 2.00 ± 0.24 |
| Fatty acid composition, % | ||||
| SFA | 40.7 ± 1.35 | 40.9 ± 1.73 | 37.0 ± 1.66 | 37.6 ± 1.41 |
| MUFA | 55.0 ± 1.42 | 55.9 ± 1.48 | 56.0 ± 1.69 | 58.0 ± 1.41 |
| PUFA | 1.40 ± 0.15 | 2.22 ± 0.18 | 3.04 ± 0.20 | 3.18 ± 0.32 |
| n‐6/n‐3 | 7.17 ± 0.17 | 10.8 ± 1.17 | 9.26 ± 1.27 | 14.7 ± 1.59 |
| Water‐holding capacity | ||||
| Drip loss, % | 2.24 ± 0.12 | 2.38 ± 0.33 | 5.49 ± 0.18 | 6.49 ± 0.80 |
| Cooking loss, % | 36.6 ± 0.90 | 37.1 ± 2.06 | 39.8 ± 0.54 | 38.5 ± 1.03 |
| Shear force, kg | ||||
| 2 day | 2.02 ± 0.18 | 1.84 ± 0.17 | 4.40 ± 0.39 | 3.63 ± 0.33 |
| 30 day | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 1.28 ± 0.10 | 2.48 ± 0.14 | 2.38 ± 0.15 |
Values are Ms ± SEM.
SFA: sum of saturated fatty acids (14:0, 15:0, 16:0, 17:0, 18:0); MUFA: sum of monounsaturated fatty acids (14:1, 16:1, 17:1 18:1, 20:1); PUFA: sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids (18:2, 18:3, 20:3, 20:4); n‐6/n‐3: (18:2n‐6 + 20:3n‐6 + 20:4n‐6)/(18:3n‐3 + 22:5n‐3).
an‐3 PUFAs were not detected in two samples of both muscles in CT group.
*p < 0.05, # p < 0.10.
Figure 1Developmental changes in myostatin gene expression in the longissimus lumborum (LL) and semitendinosus (ST) muscles of Japanese Black steers assessed by real‐time PCR. Transcript level of myostatin was normalized to GAPDH. Data are M ± SEM at each point. *p < 0.05, compared with the same age. # p < 0.10, compared with the same age. Values for different ages sharing a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). GZ: grazing group; CT: concentrate‐fed group
Figure 2Developmental changes in atrogin‐1 gene expression in the longissimus lumborum (LL) and semitendinosus (ST) muscles of Japanese Black steers assessed by real‐time PCR. Transcript level of atrogin‐1 was normalized to GAPDH. Data are M ± SEM at each point. *p < 0.05, compared with the same age. # p < 0.10, compared with the same age. Values for different ages sharing a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). GZ: grazing group; CT: concentrate‐fed group