Literature DB >> 24472124

Growth, carcass characteristics, and profitability of organic versus conventional dairy beef steers.

E A Bjorklund1, B J Heins2, A Dicostanzo1, H Chester-Jones1.   

Abstract

Bull calves (n=49), born at the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center (Morris) between March and May 2011, were used to compare growth measurements and profitability of conventional and organic dairy steers. Calves were assigned to 1 of 3 replicated groups at birth: conventional (CONV; n=16), organic (pasture and concentrate; ORG; n=16), or organic grass only (GRS; n=17), and analysis of variables was on a pen basis. Breed groups of calves were Holstein (HO; n=9); Holsteins (n=11) maintained at 1964 breed average level; crossbreds (n=19) including combinations of HO, Montbéliarde, and Swedish Red; and crossbreds (n=10) including combinations of HO, Jersey, Swedish Red, and Normande. The CONV steers were fed a diet of 80% concentrate and 20% forage. The ORG steers were fed a diet of organic corn, organic corn silage, and at least 30% of their diet consisted of organic pasture during the grazing season. The GRS steers grazed pasture during the grazing season and were fed high-quality hay or hay silage during the nongrazing season. Intakes of a total mixed ration were recorded daily with herd management software. A profit function was defined to include revenues and expenses for beef value, feed intake, pasture intake, health cost, and yardage. The GRS (358.6 kg) steers had lesser total gains from birth to slaughter than ORG (429.6 kg) and CONV (534.5 kg) steers. Furthermore, the GRS (0.61 kg/d) steers had lesser average daily gain from birth compared with ORG (0.81 kg/d) and CONV (1.1 kg/d) steers. The GRS and ORG steers had smaller rib eye area (49.5 and 65.8 cm(2), respectively) compared with CONV (75.4 cm(2)) steers. For profitability, GRS steers had 43% greater profit than CONV steers due to organic beef price premiums and lower feed costs. On the other hand, ORG steers had substantially less profit than CONV steers. The higher cost of production for the ORG steers is due to the extreme high value of organic corn. The results of the current study illustrate the economic potential of alternative strategies for growing and marketing male offspring of organic dairy cattle in the Midwest.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy beef; economics; organic; pasture

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472124     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Impact of grazing dairy steers on winter rye (Secale cereale) versus winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and effects on meat quality, fatty acid and amino acid profiles, and consumer acceptability of organic beef.

Authors:  Hannah N Phillips; Bradley J Heins; Kathleen Delate; Robert Turnbull
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comprehensive evaluation of growth performance and meat characteristics of a fattening system combining grazing with feeding rice whole-crop silage in Japanese Black steers.

Authors:  Masahiro Shibata; Yasuko Hikino; Mai Imanari; Kazunori Matsumoto
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 1.749

3.  Transcriptomic Profiling of Spleen in Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Angus Cattle.

Authors:  Yaokun Li; José A Carrillo; Yi Ding; Yanghua He; Chunping Zhao; Jianan Liu; George E Liu; Linsen Zan; Jiuzhou Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.