Literature DB >> 30661238

Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy.

Harald Paganetti1, Eleanor Blakely2, Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez3, David J Carlson4, Indra J Das5, Lei Dong3, David Grosshans6, Kathryn D Held1, Radhe Mohan6, Vitali Moiseenko7, Andrzej Niemierko1, Robert D Stewart8, Henning Willers1.   

Abstract

The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RBE; proton therapy; relative biological effectiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30661238     DOI: 10.1002/mp.13390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  42 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Henning Willers; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme.

Authors:  Neil G Burnet; Ranald I Mackay; Ed Smith; Amy L Chadwick; Gillian A Whitfield; David J Thomson; Matthew Lowe; Norman F Kirkby; Adrian M Crellin; Karen J Kirkby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Inhibition of ATM Induces Hypersensitivity to Proton Irradiation by Upregulating Toxic End Joining.

Authors:  Qin Zhou; Michelle E Howard; Xinyi Tu; Qian Zhu; Janet M Denbeigh; Nicholas B Remmes; Michael G Herman; Chris J Beltran; Jian Yuan; Patricia T Greipp; Judy C Boughey; Liewei Wang; Neil Johnson; Matthew P Goetz; Jann N Sarkaria; Zhenkun Lou; Robert W Mutter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Dual-storage phosphor proton therapy dosimetry: Simultaneous quantification of dose and linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Jufri Setianegara; Thomas R Mazur; Deshan Yang; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee.

Authors:  Robert W Mutter; J Isabelle Choi; Rachel B Jimenez; Youlia M Kirova; Marcio Fagundes; Bruce G Haffty; Richard A Amos; Julie A Bradley; Peter Y Chen; Xuanfeng Ding; Antoinette M Carr; Leslie M Taylor; Mark Pankuch; Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Alice Y Ho; Petra Witt Nyström; Lisa A McGee; James J Urbanic; Oren Cahlon; John H Maduro; Shannon M MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.013

Review 9.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 10.  Physical and Biological Characteristics of Particle Therapy for Oncologists.

Authors:  Hwa Kyung Byun; Min Cheol Han; Kyungmi Yang; Jin Sung Kim; Gyu Sang Yoo; Woong Sub Koom; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.