OBJECTIVES: To analyze functional outcomes and complication rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in patients who had undergone buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) beforehand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospectively maintained single-center database comprises data from 236 patients from 2009 to 2015 who underwent AUS implantation. A total of 17 patients after BMGU were available for analysis. Primary endpoints consisted of continence and complication rates. Continence was defined as no use of safety pads, social continence as < 2 pads per day. Stricture recurrence was defined as a decrease in uroflowmetry, a maximum flow rate < 10 ml/s or residual urine volume (> 100 ml). Kaplan-Meier analysis determined explantation-free survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6-31 months). Indication for AUS implantation was severe urinary incontinence with a history of radical prostatectomy (RRP) in 8 (47.1%), trauma in 1 (5.9%) and TUR-P in 8 (47.1%) patients. Pelvic irradiation was reported in 13 (76.5%) cases. The median length of buccal mucosa graft for urethroplasty was 4 cm (3-5 cm). A double cuff was implanted in 14 patients (82.4%), 3 patients received a single cuff. Complete and social continence was achieved in 76.5% and 100% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in complications and explantation-free survival (log-rank, p = 0.191) between patients who had undergone BMGU before AUS compared to patients with no history of BMGU. CONCLUSIONS: According to the prospective follow-up data in a homogenous cohort, AUS implantation seems to be a viable, safe and effective therapeutic strategy for incontinence treatment despite previous BMGU.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze functional outcomes and complication rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in patients who had undergone buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) beforehand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospectively maintained single-center database comprises data from 236 patients from 2009 to 2015 who underwent AUS implantation. A total of 17 patients after BMGU were available for analysis. Primary endpoints consisted of continence and complication rates. Continence was defined as no use of safety pads, social continence as < 2 pads per day. Stricture recurrence was defined as a decrease in uroflowmetry, a maximum flow rate < 10 ml/s or residual urine volume (> 100 ml). Kaplan-Meier analysis determined explantation-free survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6-31 months). Indication for AUS implantation was severe urinary incontinence with a history of radical prostatectomy (RRP) in 8 (47.1%), trauma in 1 (5.9%) and TUR-P in 8 (47.1%) patients. Pelvic irradiation was reported in 13 (76.5%) cases. The median length of buccal mucosa graft for urethroplasty was 4 cm (3-5 cm). A double cuff was implanted in 14 patients (82.4%), 3 patients received a single cuff. Complete and social continence was achieved in 76.5% and 100% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in complications and explantation-free survival (log-rank, p = 0.191) between patients who had undergone BMGU before AUS compared to patients with no history of BMGU. CONCLUSIONS: According to the prospective follow-up data in a homogenous cohort, AUS implantation seems to be a viable, safe and effective therapeutic strategy for incontinence treatment despite previous BMGU.
Authors: Sascha A Ahyai; Tim A Ludwig; Roland Dahlem; Armin Soave; Clemens Rosenbaum; Felix K-H Chun; Margit Fisch; Marianne Schmid; Luis A Kluth Journal: BJU Int Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jay Simhan; Allen F Morey; Nirmish Singla; Timothy J Tausch; J Francis Scott; Gary E Lemack; Claus G Roehrborn Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew J Resnick; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; R Lawrence Van Horn; David F Penson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Victor Maximilian Schuettfort; Roland Dahlem; Luis Kluth; Daniel Pfalzgraf; Clemens Rosenbaum; Tim Ludwig; Margit Fisch; Christoph-Philip Reiss Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Roger K Khouri; Nicolas M Ortiz; Benjamin M Dropkin; Gregory A Joice; Adam S Baumgarten; Allen F Morey; Steven J Hudak Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Connor G Policastro; Jay Simhan; Francisco E Martins; Nicolaas Lumen; Krishnan Venkatesan; Javier C Angulo; Shubham Gupta; Paul Rusilko; Erick Alejandro Ramírez Pérez; Kirk Redger; Brian J Flynn; Michael Hughes; Stephen Blakely; Dmitriy Nikolavsky Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Katharina Kuhlencord; Roland Dahlem; Malte W Vetterlein; Raisa S Abrams-Pompe; Valentin Maurer; Christian P Meyer; Silke Riechardt; Margit Fisch; Tim A Ludwig; Phillip Marks Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Ane Ullate; Ignacio Arance; Miguel Virseda-Chamorro; Sonia Ruiz; Juliusz Szczesniewski; Carlos Téllez; Fabian Queissert; Juan F Dorado; Javier C Angulo Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 4.964