Literature DB >> 30655717

Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Osamu Ishihara1, Seung Chik Jwa1, Akira Kuwahara2, Tomonori Ishikawa3, Koji Kugu4, Rintaro Sawa5,6, Kouji Banno7, Minoru Irahara2, Hidekazu Saito8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology started an online cycle-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) registry system in 2007. This report presents the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART registered for the cycles practiced during 2016.
METHODS: Cycle-specific information for all ART cycles implemented in participating ART facilities were collected. A descriptive analysis was conducted for the registry database of 2016.
RESULTS: In total, 447 790 treatment cycles and 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan) were reported in 2016. The mean patients' age was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5). Among the egg retrieval cycles, 104 575 of 251 399 (41.6%) were freeze-all cycles without fresh embryo transfers (ET), while fresh ET was performed in 64 497 cycles (58.4%). A total of 187 132 frozen-thawed ET cycles were reported, resulting in 62 432 pregnancies and 44 484 neonates born. Single ET was selected for 81.0% of fresh transfers and 82.7% of frozen cycles, resulting in singleton pregnancy/live birth rates of 97.0%/96.4% and 96.7%/96.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The total ART cycles and subsequent live births continued to increase in 2016. Single ET was performed more than 80%, and ET has shifted from using fresh embryos to frozen ones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART registry; Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; freeze‐all; in vitro fertilization; single embryo transfer

Year:  2018        PMID: 30655717      PMCID: PMC6332769          DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


INTRODUCTION

In Japan, the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in 1983, and thereafter, the annual number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles has dramatically increased year by year. Japan has become one of the largest users of ART worldwide in terms of the annual number of treatment cycles done.1 Records of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of ART are crucial to monitor trends and situations of ART treatment implemented in a country. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) started an ART registry system in 1986. In 2007, the JSOG launched an online registration system and collected cycle‐specific information for all ART treatment cycles implemented in ART facilities. The aim of this study was to report the characteristics and treatment outcomes of ART cycles registered during 2016 following the previous report.2

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 2007, the JSOG has requested all participating ART clinics and hospitals to register cycle‐specific information for all treatment cycles. The information includes patient characteristics, information on ART treatment, and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Details on the information collected in the registry have been reported previously.3 For ART cycles conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2016, JSOG requested registration of the information via an online registry system by the end of November 2017. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Saitama Medical University and ethics committee at the JSOG. Using the database registered for 2016, a descriptive analysis was performed to investigate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles, freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles, pregnancies, and neonates were compared with that in previous years. The characteristics of the registered cycles and treatment outcomes were described for fresh and FET cycles. Treatment outcomes included the pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates, multiple pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes for ectopic pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy coexisting with an ectopic pregnancy, artificial abortion, stillbirth, and fetal reduction. Furthermore, the treatment outcomes of pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy rates were analyzed according to patient age. Treatment outcomes for cycles using frozen‐thawed oocytes were also reported.

RESULTS

There were 604 registered ART facilities in 2016, of which 603 participated in the ART registration system. The number of facilities that actually implemented ART treatment in 2016 was 587; 16 registered facilities did not implement ART cycles. The trends in the number of registered cycles, egg retrievals, pregnancies, and neonates for IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and FET cycles from 1985 to 2016 are shown in Table 1. In 2016, 447 790 cycles were registered and 54 110 neonates were recorded, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan (total number of neonates was 976 979 in 2016). The total number of registered cycles demonstrated an increasing trend from 1985 to 2016 for both fresh ET and FET cycles. In 2016, the numbers of cycles registered for fresh IVF, fresh ICSI, and FET cycles were 94 566, 161 262, and 191 962, respectively. The total number of freeze‐all embryos/oocytes cycles showed an increasing trend both for IVF and ICSI cycles, and 34 188/92 185 IVF (37.1%) and 70 387/159 214 ICSI (44.2%) cycles used freeze‐all embryos/oocytes in 2016, resulting in fewer fresh ET cycles in 2016 than in 2015. In terms of FET cycles, 188 388 FETs were performed resulting in 62 749 pregnancies and 44 678 neonates in 2016.
Table 1

Trends in numbers of registered cycles, egg retrieval, pregnancy, and neonates according to IVF, ICSI, and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles, Japan, 1985‐2016

YearFresh cyclesFET cycles[Link]
IVF[Link] ICSI[Link] No. of registered cyclesNo. of ET cyclesNo. of cycles with pregnancyNo. of neonates
No. of registered cyclesNo. of egg retrievalNo. of freeze‐all cyclesNo. of ET cyclesNo. of cycles with pregnancyNo. of neonatesNo. of registered cyclesNo. of egg retrievalNo. of freeze‐all cyclesNo. of ET cyclesNo. of cycles with pregnancyNo. of neonates
1985119511958626427
19867527525565616
198715031503107013554
1988170217021665257114
19894218389029685804461849273
1990740568925361117810311601531717
199111 17710 5818473201516613693525739
199217 40416 38112 2502702252596393652442355535307966
199321 28720 34515 565373033342608244712711761496815978671
199425 15724 03318 6904069373455105339411475969813031112179144
199526 64824 69418 905424638109820905477221732157916821426323298
199627 33826 38521 4924818443613 43813 04411 2692799258829002676449386
199732 24730 73324 7685730506016 57316 37614 27534953249520849581086902
199834 92933 67027 4366255585118 65718 26615 505395237018132764317481567
199936 08534 29027 4556812587022 98422 35018 592470242479950909321981812
200031 33429 90724 4476328544726 71225 79421 0675240458211 65310 71926602245
200132 67631 05125 1436749582930 36929 30923 0585924486213 03411 88830802467
200234 95333 84926 8547767644334 82433 82325 8666775548615 88714 75940943299
200338 57536 48028 2148336660838 87136 66327 8957506599424 45919 64162054798
200441 61939 65629 0908542670944 69843 62829 9467768592130 28724 42276065538
200542 82240 47129 3378893670647 57945 38830 9838019586435 06928 74393966542
200644 77842 24829 4408509625652 53949 85432 5097904540142 17135 80411 7987930
200753 87352 165762628 2287416514461 81360 29411 54134 0327784519445 47843 58913 9659257
200859 14857 21710 13929 1246897466471 35069 86415 39034 4257017461560 11557 84618 59712 425
200963 08360 75411 80028 5596891504676 79075 34019 04635 1677330518073 92771 36723 21616 454
201067 71464 96613 84327 9056556465790 67788 82224 37937 1727699527783 77081 30027 38219 011
201171 42268 65116 20227 28463414546102 473100 51830 77338 0987601541595 76492 78231 72122 465
201282 10879 43420 62729 69367034740125 229122 96241 94340 82979475498119 089116 17639 10627 715
201389 95087 10425 08530 16468174776134 871134 87149 31641 15080275630141 335138 24945 39232 148
201492 26989 39727 62430 41469705025144 247141 88855 85141 43781225702157 229153 97751 45836 595
201593 61491 07930 49828 85864784629155 797153 63963 66041 39681695761174 740171 49556 88840 611
201694 56692 18534 18826 18259034266161 262159 21470 38738 31573245166191 962188 33862 74944 678

ET, embryo transfer; FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.

Including gamete intrafallopian transfer.

Including Split‐ICSI cycles.

Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.

Trends in numbers of registered cycles, egg retrieval, pregnancy, and neonates according to IVF, ICSI, and frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles, Japan, 1985‐2016 ET, embryo transfer; FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization. Including gamete intrafallopian transfer. Including Split‐ICSI cycles. Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte. Distributions of patients’ age in registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy and live birth are shown in Figure 1. The patients’ mean age for the registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), while the mean age for pregnancy and live birth cycles was 36.2 years (SD = 4.1) and 35.6 years (SD = 4.0), respectively.
Figure 1

Age distributions of registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy, and live birth. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsogart/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer

Age distributions of registered cycles, different subgroup of cycles with ET, pregnancy, and live birth. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsogart/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the registered fresh cycles are shown in Table 2. There were 89 857 registered IVF cycles, 24 754 split‐ICSI cycles, 133 709 ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm, 2799 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm extraction (TESE), 27 gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles, 462 cycles with oocyte freezing based on medical indications, and 4220 other cycles. Of the 251 399 cycles with oocyte retrieval, 104 575 (41.6%) were freeze‐all cycles. The pregnancy rate per ET was 22.7% for IVF and 18.2% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm. Single ET was performed at a rate of 81.0% with a pregnancy rate of 20.8%. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 25.9% for IVF, 28.5% for ICSI using ejaculated sperm, and 27.6% for ICSI with TESE, resulting in respective live birth rates per ET of 15.9%, 12.3%, and 10.3%. Singleton pregnancy rate and live birth rate were 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively.
Table 2

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

VariablesIVF‐ETSplitICSIGIFTFrozen oocyteOthers[Link] Total
Ejaculated spermTESE
No. of registered cycles89 85724 754133 7092799274624220255 828
No. of egg retrieval87 65624 545131 8732796274544048251 399
No. of fresh ET cycles25 649649930 9178992750664 497
No. of freeze‐all cycles32 37915 09054 036126103951414104 575
No. of cycles with pregnancy58171555563513418513 227
Pregnancy rate per ET (%)22.723.918.214.93.716.820.5
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval (%)6.66.34.34.83.72.15.3
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval excluding freeze‐all cycles(%)10.516.47.28.73.73.29.0
SET cycles21 199560624 517548336552 238
Pregnancy following SET cycles4825137244849406510 840
Rate of SET cycles82.7%86.3%79.3%61.0%11.1%72.1%81.0%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles22.8%24.5%18.3%17.2%0.0%17.8%20.8%
Miscarriages15083571605370243531
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy25.9%23.0%28.5%27.6%0.0%28.2%26.7%
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 55181496531812118212 536
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 18131170301386
Twin pregnancies[Link] 18031168301383
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 1020003
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 0000000
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] 3.22.03.12.40.01.23.0
Live births407811233806931589159
Live birth rate per ET (%)15.917.312.310.33.711.514.2
Total number of neonates420611553916951599432
Singleton live births393010903666891578833
Twin live births13531122301292
Triplet live births2120005
Quadruplet live births0000000
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies682677102174
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy1010002
Artificial abortions2362800158
Stillbirths2251900046
Fetal reductions0010001
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes1053595300238

ET, embryo transfer; GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF‐ET, in vitro fertilization‐embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer; TESE, testicular sperm extraction.

Others include ZIFT.

Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016 ET, embryo transfer; GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF‐ET, in vitro fertilization‐embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer; TESE, testicular sperm extraction. Others include ZIFT. Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero. The characteristics and treatment outcomes of the FET cycles are shown in Table 3. There were 190 541 registered cycles, of which FET was performed in 187 132 cycles leading to 62 434 pregnancies (pregnancy rate per FET = 33.4%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 26.5%, resulting in a 23.0% live birth rate per ET. Single ET was performed at a rate of 82.7%, and the singleton pregnancy and live birth rate was 96.7% and 96.4%, respectively.
Table 3

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of frozen cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

VariablesFETOthers[Link] Total
No. of registered cycles190 5411222191 763
No. of FET187 1321100188 232
No. of cycles with pregnancy62 43229462 726
Pregnancy rate per FET (%)33.426.733.3
SET cycles154 801849155 650
Pregnancy following SET cycles53 13023053 360
Rate of SET cycles (%)82.777.282.7
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles (%)34.327.134.3
Miscarriages16 5528416 636
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%)26.528.626.5
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 59 47225759 729
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 2020122032
Twin pregnancies[Link] 1979111990
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 38139
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 303
Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link] 3.34.53.3
Live births43 15317643 329
Live birth rate per FET (%)23.116.023.0
Total number of neonates44 48417844 662
Singleton live births41 61517041 785
Twin live births141241416
Triplet live births15015
Quadruplet live births000
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies3572359
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy101
Artificial abortions2771278
Stillbirths1752177
Fetal reduction23124
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes1702111713

FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte.

Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of frozen cycles in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016 FET, frozen‐thawed embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer. Including cycles using frozen‐thawed oocyte. Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero. The treatment outcomes of registered cycles including pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, and multiple pregnancy rates according to patients’ age are shown in Table 4. Similarly, the distribution of the pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age is shown in Figure 2. The pregnancy rate per ET exceeded 40% up to 33 years of age, gradually fell below 30% after 39 years of age and below 10% after 44 years of age. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17% for those under 32 years of age and gradually increased with an increase in patient age. The miscarriage rate was below 20% under 35 years of age but gradually increased to 34.3% and 52.6% for those of 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. The live birth rate per registered cycle was around 20% up to 33 years of age and decreased to 9.0% and 2.8% at 40 and 43 years of age, respectively. Multiple pregnancy rates varied between 2% and 3% across most of the age groups.
Table 4

Treatment outcomes of registered cycles according to patients' age, Japan, 2016

Age (y)No. of registered cyclesNo. of ET cyclesPregnancyLive birthMiscarriagePregnancy rate per ET (%)Pregnancy rate per registered cycles (%)Live birth rate per registered cycles (%)Miscarriage rate per pregnancy (%)Multiple pregnancy rate (%)[Link]
Under 20s39311033.32.62.60.00.0
21291364246.220.713.833.30.0
227137119229.715.512.718.20.0
23160863732443.023.120.010.80.0
2436421198771546.426.921.215.37.3
257484401891433743.025.319.119.63.8
2614639033862947342.726.420.118.93.4
272581163173756813045.228.622.017.63.4
28465828981310103521645.228.122.216.52.7
29713945271939152032742.827.221.316.93.0
3010 02063492729213447543.027.221.317.43.0
3112 95181563434266761342.126.520.617.92.9
3215 83210 0664184324975541.626.420.518.03.2
3318 96612 1384909378490040.425.920.018.33.1
3422 69014 34556494302112039.424.919.019.82.7
3525 44416 18062844727128838.824.718.620.53.8
3628 30317 66764124661146736.322.716.522.93.4
3731 19519 26469264899171636.022.215.724.83.6
3834 73320 92967594676178232.319.513.526.43.3
3938 67722 60767034454195329.717.311.529.13.5
4039 75222 16857733567197826.014.59.034.33.8
4139 21920 97147712691189522.812.26.939.73.2
4238 04819 20833971717153217.78.94.545.12.5
4329 01113 7711918820100913.96.62.852.62.7
4420 313882393033056510.54.61.660.82.4
4512 5604961319922086.42.50.765.22.0
466437238911236734.71.70.665.20.0
47341811463310222.91.00.366.70.0
4817165479181.60.50.188.90.0
497722436142.50.80.166.70.0
Over 50s4811585323.21.00.640.00.0

ET, embryo transfer.

Multiple pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Figure 2

Pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsog-art/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer

Treatment outcomes of registered cycles according to patients' age, Japan, 2016 ET, embryo transfer. Multiple pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero. Pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patients’ age. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology assisted reproductive technology Databook 2016 (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsog-art/2016data_20180930.pdf). ET, embryo transfer The treatment outcomes for FET using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications are shown in Table 5. The total number of FET using frozen oocytes was 106 cycles, of which 23 cycles resulted in a pregnancy (pregnancy rate per FET = 21.1%). The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 17.4%, resulting in a 15.1% live birth rate per ET.
Table 5

Treatment outcomes of embryo transfers using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016

VariablesEmbryo transfer using frozen‐thawed oocyte
No. of registered cycles199
No. of ET106
No. of cycles with pregnancy23
Pregnancy rate per ET21.7%
SET cycles68
Pregnancy following SET cycles15
Rate of SET cycles64.2%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles22.1%
Miscarriages4
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy17.4%
Singleton pregnancies[Link] 23
Multiple pregnancies[Link] 0
Twin pregnancies[Link] 0
Triplet pregnancies[Link] 0
Quadruplet pregnancies[Link] 0
Multiple pregnancy rate[Link] 0
Live births16
Live birth rate per ET15.1%
Total number of neonates16
Singleton live births16
Twin live births0
Triplet live births0
Quadruplet live births0
Pregnancy outcomes
Ectopic pregnancies0
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy0
Artificial abortions0
Still births0
Fetal reduction0
Unknown cycles for pregnancy outcomes3

ET, embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Treatment outcomes of embryo transfers using frozen‐thawed oocytes based on medical indications in assisted reproductive technology, Japan, 2016 ET, embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer. Singleton, twin, triplet and quadruplet pregnancies were defined according to the number of gestational sacs in utero.

DISCUSSION

Using the current Japanese ART registry system, this study demonstrated that the total number of registered ART cycles was 447 790, and resultant live births were 54 110, accounting for one in 18.1 neonates born in Japan in 2016. These figures are the largest since the registry started. Single ET was performed at rates of more than 80% for both fresh and frozen cycles, resulting in a singleton live birth rate of 96% in total. The number of freeze‐all cycles increased, resulting in a reduction in the number of fresh ET cycles. These results represent the latest clinical practice of ART in Japan. One potential reason for the rising number of ART cycles is the advancing age of patients receiving ART. In the registered cycles, the mean age of registered cycles was 38.1 years (SD = 4.5), which was much higher than the mean age for cycles with live births (35.6 years, SD = 4.0). This age gap between patients receiving ART and patients who gave live birth after ART warrants further investigation. Patients’ age is the most important factor determining the probability of a live birth after ART. Since the pregnancy and live birth rates decreased as patients’ age increased (Table 4), the number of ET cycles resulting in a live birth would theoretically exceed that in patients of a younger age. Thus, substantial education of patients regarding the association between age and probabilities for pregnancy in ART is essential. Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80% both for fresh and frozen cycles, which is the highest rate in the world.1 Single ET is one effective way to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes related to multiple births while maintaining a cumulative live birth rate.4 In 2008, JSOG recommended restricting the number of ETs to one in order to prevent multiple pregnancies, although double ET was allowed for women over 35 years of age or for women who experienced recurrent implantation failure. As a result, the rate of single ET dramatically increased from 49.9% in 2007 to 73.0% in 20105 and continues to rise (82.7% in FET cycles in 2016). The single ET policy has been credited with improving other indicators of perinatal outcomes in Japan.6 There was a significant transition to the freeze‐all policy (Table 1). Freeze‐all provides an effective treatment option for patients at high risk for ovarian hyper‐stimulation syndrome (OHSS), preventing the symptoms and severity becoming worse.7 A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in China demonstrated that the freeze‐all strategy had a significantly decreased risk for adverse outcomes such as OHSS and miscarriage, and a significantly higher rate of live birth among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients.8 Whether the freeze‐all strategy would improve ART outcomes among non‐PCOS patients remains unresolved. Observational investigations demonstrated that FET cycles resulted in better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes than fresh cycles,6, 9, 10 however, two RCTs published in 2018 revealed that the effect of the freeze‐all strategy on pregnancy outcomes (ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate) was not different between patients who had the freeze‐all strategy and who received fresh ET after oocyte retrievals.11, 12 The strengths of the Japanese ART registry system include its mandatory reporting system and high compliance rate. Patients cannot receive a government subsidy for a cycle if their ART facility does not register the cycle‐specific information. Almost all the participating ART clinics and hospitals (603 out of 604 facilities) registered cycle‐specific information, which is high among participating countries of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies.1 Since the Japanese ART registry system has such a significant compliance, the next step for improving the registration system is maintaining the quality of the database. In order to use the registry database for research purposes and for important feedback to participating ART facilities and patients, we need to maintain the integrity of registration, and to assess the validity of the registry, as done by other countries.13, 14 For example, by maintaining data quality, the United States registry system developed a patients’ and clinicians’ platform for the prediction of pregnancy and live birth rate (https://www.sart.org/), helpful for patients’ education and promoting appropriate informed consent at ART facilities. Thus, the need for ongoing improvements in the registration system for participating ART facilities and patients appears inevitable. In conclusion, our analysis of the ART registry for 2016 demonstrated that the total number of ART cycles increased and resulted in 54 110 neonates (one in 18.1 neonates in Japan). The patients’ age receiving ART was significantly higher than the mean age of patients who had live birth. Single ET was performed at a rate of more than 80%, resulting in a 96% singleton live birth rate. Ongoing investigation is required to determine the effect of the increasing use of freeze‐all cycles. These data represent the latest clinical practices of ART in Japan, and further improvements in the registration system in Japan will be important.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Saitama Medical University and the ethics committee at the JSOG.

DISCLOSURES

Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study. Human rights statement and informed consent: All the procedures accorded with the ethical standards of the relevant committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients in the study. Animal rights: This article does not contain any study that was performed by any of the authors that included animal participants.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Siriol Griffiths; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012.

Authors:  Kazumi Takeshima; Seung Chik Jwa; Hidekazu Saito; Aritoshi Nakaza; Akira Kuwahara; Osamu Ishihara; Minoru Irahara; Fumiki Hirahara; Yasunori Yoshimura; Tetsuro Sakumoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan-analysis of four-year data from the national registry system.

Authors:  Kazumi Takeshima; Hidekazu Saito; Aritoshi Nakaza; Akira Kuwahara; Osamu Ishihara; Minoru Irahara; Humiki Hirahara; Yasunori Yoshimura; Tetsuro Sakumoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update.

Authors:  James P Toner; Charles C Coddington; Kevin Doody; Brad Van Voorhis; David B Seifer; G David Ball; Barbara Luke; Ethan Wantman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  Selma Mourad; Julie Brown; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 6.  Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Pinborg; U B Wennerholm; L B Romundstad; A Loft; K Aittomaki; V Söderström-Anttila; K G Nygren; J Hazekamp; C Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Daksha Gopal; Rebecca F Liberman; Marlene Anderka; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010.

Authors:  S Dyer; G M Chambers; J de Mouzon; K G Nygren; F Zegers-Hochschild; R Mansour; O Ishihara; M Banker; G D Adamson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Chen; Yuhua Shi; Yun Sun; Bo Zhang; Xiaoyan Liang; Yunxia Cao; Jing Yang; Jiayin Liu; Daimin Wei; Ning Weng; Lifeng Tian; Cuifang Hao; Dongzi Yang; Feng Zhou; Juanzi Shi; Yongle Xu; Jing Li; Junhao Yan; Yingying Qin; Han Zhao; Heping Zhang; Richard S Legro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006.

Authors:  Anja Pinborg; Anne Loft; Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen; Steen Rasmussen; Anders Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  10 in total

1.  Down syndrome live births following assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a nationwide survey between 2007 and 2016.

Authors:  Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Namba; Shunsuke Tamaru; Akira Kuwahara; Haruhiko Sago; Osamu Ishihara; Yoshimasa Kamei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Impact of subchorionic hematoma in early pregnancy on obstetric complications: A retrospective cohort study in women who had live births after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  Shuhei So; Osamu Mochizuki; Wakasa Yamaguchi; Nao Murabayashi; Naomi Miyano; Fumiko Tawara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-08-05

3.  Risk factors for resignation from work after starting infertility treatment among Japanese women: Japan-Female Employment and Mental health in Assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study.

Authors:  Yuya Imai; Motoki Endo; Keiji Kuroda; Kiyohide Tomooka; Yuko Ikemoto; Setsuko Sato; Kiyomi Mitsui; Yuito Ueda; Gautam A Deshpande; Atsushi Tanaka; Rikikazu Sugiyama; Koji Nakagawa; Yuichi Sato; Yasushi Kuribayashi; Atsuo Itakura; Satoru Takeda; Takeshi Tanigawa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Evaluation of the effect of piezo-intracytoplasmic sperm injection on the laboratory, clinical, and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Fujii; Yuji Endo; Shingo Mitsuhata; Momoko Hayashi; Hiroaki Motoyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-18

5.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2018 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Osamu Ishihara; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Yukiko Katagiri; Yoshimitsu Kuwabara; Toshio Hamatani; Miyuki Harada; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 6.  A comparison of assisted human reproduction (AHR) regulation in Ireland with other developed countries.

Authors:  Olivia McDermott; Lauraine Ronan; Mary Butler
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2019 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Yukiko Katagiri; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Takeshi Iwasa; Masanori Ono; Keiichi Kato; Hiroshi Kishi; Yoshimitsu Kuwabara; Miyuki Harada; Toshio Hamatani; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-14

8.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2017 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Osamu Ishihara; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Yukiko Katagiri; Yoshimitsu Kuwabara; Toshio Hamatani; Miyuki Harada; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-21

9.  Erectile Dysfunction is Predictive Symptom for Poor Semen in Newlywed Men in Japan.

Authors:  Akira Tsujimura; Ippei Hiramatsu; Yuki Nagashima; Keisuke Ishikawa; Yuka Uesaka; Taiji Nozaki; Tatsuya Ogishima; Masato Shirai; Kazutaka Terai; Kazuhiro Kobayashi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.491

10.  Relationship between follicular size and developmental capacity of oocytes under controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Isao Tamura; Mai Kawamoto-Jozaki; Taishi Fujimura; Yumiko Doi-Tanaka; Haruka Takagi; Yuichiro Shirafuta; Yumiko Mihara; Toshiaki Taketani; Hiroshi Tamura; Norihiro Sugino
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.