Literature DB >> 26518122

Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012.

Kazumi Takeshima1, Seung Chik Jwa2, Hidekazu Saito3, Aritoshi Nakaza4, Akira Kuwahara5, Osamu Ishihara6, Minoru Irahara5, Fumiki Hirahara7, Yasunori Yoshimura8, Tetsuro Sakumoto4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the introduction of single embryo transfer (SET) policy in Japan has improved perinatal outcomes.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 140,718 live births and 510 stillbirths (after 22 weeks of gestation) conceived by assisted reproductive technology in Japan between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), perinatal mortality, and other pregnancy complications. RESULT(S): The rate of SET increased significantly from 52.2% in 2007 to 82.6% in 2012, while the rate of multiple pregnancy decreased significantly from 10.7% to 4.1% over the same period. The rates of PTB, LBW, and SGA decreased significantly, while that of LGA increased. Perinatal mortality decreased from 0.70% to 0.40% in fresh cycles, while that of frozen cycles did not change. Double ET or more was associated with a significantly increased risk for multiple pregnancy, placenta accreta, preterm premature rupture of membrane, cesarean section (CS), PTB, LBW, SGA, and early neonatal death compared with SET. Compared with before the SET policy was launched, the risks of multiple pregnancy, CS, early PTB before 32 weeks, LBW, VLBW, and SGA were significantly decreased after the policy was launched, with significant interactions of fresh/frozen status. CONCLUSION(S): The results suggest that the SET policy improved perinatal outcomes in Japan. The impact of SET policy was different in fresh and frozen cycles for several perinatal outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; low birth weight; perinatal outcome; preterm delivery; single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518122     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Increased incidence of post-term delivery and Cesarean section after frozen-thawed embryo transfer during a hormone replacement cycle.

Authors:  Kazuki Saito; Kenji Miyado; Kenji Yamatoya; Akira Kuwahara; Eisuke Inoue; Mami Miyado; Maki Fukami; Tomonori Ishikawa; Takakazu Saito; Toshiro Kubota; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Birth weight reference for Japanese twins and risk factors for infant mortality: A population-based study.

Authors:  Yuri Ishida; Yo Takemoto; Masaya Kato; Mahbub Latif; Erika Ota; Naho Morisaki; Atsuo Itakura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Effectiveness and Safety of Two Consecutive Cycles of Single Embryo Transfer Compared With One Cycle of Double Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yangqin Peng; Shujuan Ma; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Minghong Yao; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Tjitske Zaat; Miriam Zagers; Femke Mol; Mariëtte Goddijn; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-04

5.  Treatment period and medical care costs to achieve the first live birth by assisted reproductive technology are lower in the single embryo transfer period than in the double embryo transfer period: a retrospective analysis of women younger than 40 years of age.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kawahara; Akane Ueda; Takashi Nakahori; Tetsuro Honda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  The twin epidemic in infertility care - Why do we persist in transferring too many embryos?

Authors:  W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-12

7.  Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  W Ombelet; G Martens; L Bruckers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Osamu Ishihara; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Tomonori Ishikawa; Koji Kugu; Rintaro Sawa; Kouji Banno; Minoru Irahara; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-29

10.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by The Ethics Committee of The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Hidekazu Saito; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Kazuki Saito; Tomonori Ishikawa; Osamu Ishihara; Koji Kugu; Rintaro Sawa; Kouji Banno; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.