Literature DB >> 30655358

Safety and efficiency of the fifth generation Woven EndoBridge device: technical note.

Cristian Mihalea1,2, Jildaz Caroff1, Igor Pagiola1,3, Leon Ikka1, Gelareh Bani Hashemi1, Soheil Naderi1, Vanessa Chalumeau1, Horia Ples2, Bogdan Valeriu Popa4, Thomas Yasuda1, Joaquin Jose Marenco de la Torre1, Marta Iacobucci1, Augustin Ozanne1, Sophie Gallas1, Aymeric Rouchaud5, Sorin Pescariu6, Jacques Moret1, Laurent Spelle1.   

Abstract

BACKROUND: The treatment of wide neck bifurcation aneurysms remains challenging despite the introduction of new techniques (Y stenting, waffle cone technique, or flow diverter stents). The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an innovative solution for this type of cerebral aneurysm. A new WEB 17 is now available and has been designed to offer smaller sized devices to optimize navigability and delivery.
METHODS: Between February 2017 and April 2018 all patients treated with the WEB 17 device in our center were retrospectively reviewed. 25 patients with 28 non-ruptured aneurysms were identified and analyzed. Three patients with two aneurysms both treated with the WEB device were identified.
RESULTS: The device was successfully deployed in all cases. Procedure related morbidity was 4% and mortality was 0%. In one case, a delayed postprocedural thromboembolic event occurred owing to device protrusion. Technical success, complications, angiographic outcomes, procedural data, and follow-ups are reported. The modified Rankin Scale score at discharge was 0 for 24 patients (96%). At the 3, 6, or 9 month follow-up, angiograms were taken of 21 of the 25 patients (84%) (24 of 28 aneurysms had been controlled); 3 patients (3 aneurysms) did not receive angiographic follow-up at the time of submission of this work. Complete occlusion was achieved in 22 of 24 aneurysms (91.66%), and 2 of 24 aneurysm (8.33%) showed a neck remnant.
CONCLUSIONS: The WEB 17 is safe and technically feasible, according to this retrospective single center analysis. For very small bifurcation aneurysms, the WEB 17 seems to have lower complication rates than stent assisted techniques. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the complication rate and long term efficiency. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; device; intervention; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30655358     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  10 in total

1.  Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Woven EndoBridge 17 Device Including Midterm Follow-Up Results: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  C Maurer; I König; A Berlis; W Weber; S Fischer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility.

Authors:  L Goertz; T Liebig; E Siebert; M Herzberg; L Pennig; M Schlamann; J Borggrefe; B Krischek; F Dorn; C Kabbasch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Woven Endobridge (WEB) Device as a Retreatment Strategy After Unsuccessful Surgical Clipping.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Carmen Parra-Farinas; Ruth-Mary deSouza; Naga Kandasamy; Jo Bhattacharya; Prem Rangi; Jonathan Downer
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Widening the Indications for Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: WEB 17 in the Treatment of Aneurysm Locations Different from Those in the Good Clinical Practice Trials.

Authors:  S Zimmer; V Maus; C Maurer; A Berlis; W Weber; S Fischer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Different Rescue Approaches of Migrated Woven Endobridge (WEB) Devices: an Animal Study.

Authors:  Andreas Simgen; Michael Kettner; Philipp Dietrich; Toshiki Tomori; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Pervinder Bhogal; Matthias W Laschke; Michael D Menger; Wolfgang Reith; Umut Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Endovascular Treatment of Small and Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge Device.

Authors:  J-B Girot; J Caroff; J Cortese; C Mihalea; A Rouchaud; V Da Ros; J V Martinez; L Contreras; L Ikka; V Chalumeau; A Ozanne; G B D Aguiar; S Gallas; J Moret; L Spelle
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 7.  How to WEB: a practical review of methodology for the use of the Woven EndoBridge.

Authors:  Nitin Goyal; Daniel Hoit; Julie DiNitto; Lucas Elijovich; David Fiorella; Laurent Pierot; Saleh Lamin; Laurent Spelle; Isil Saatci; Saru Cekirge; Adam S Arthur
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Intracranial aneurysm treatment with intrasaccular flow disruption: comparison of WEB-21 and WEB-17 systems.

Authors:  Paolo Pagano; Laurentiu Paiusan; Sebastien Soize; Laurent Pierot
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.572

9.  Impact of A1 Asymmetry on the Woven EndoBridge Device in Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.

Authors:  J Cortese; J Caroff; J-B Girot; C Mihalea; V Da Ros; G Aguiar; A Elawady; L Ikka; S Gallas; A Ozanne; V Chalumeau; A Rouchaud; J Moret; L Spelle
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  High-resolution image-guided WEB aneurysm embolization by high-frequency optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Zeynep Vardar; Robert M King; Afif Kraitem; Erin T Langan; Lindsy M Peterson; Benjamin H Duncan; Christopher M Raskett; Vania Anagnostakou; Matthew J Gounis; Ajit S Puri; Giovanni J Ughi
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.572

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.