Literature DB >> 32179191

Woven Endobridge (WEB) Device as a Retreatment Strategy After Unsuccessful Surgical Clipping.

Thomas C Booth1, Carmen Parra-Farinas2, Ruth-Mary deSouza3, Naga Kandasamy4, Jo Bhattacharya5, Prem Rangi6, Jonathan Downer7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms is typically robust and durable. However, residual aneurysmal components may be seen after clipping. Furthermore, there may be occasional aneurysmal recurrence. These factors are both clinically relevant because subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping is a rare but important event. The rationale for any treatment is to substantially decrease the future risk of hemorrhage. Small series have shown coiling as a retreatment strategy after unsuccessful clipping, but none has explored the feasibility of Woven Endobridge (WEB) implantation. CASE DESCRIPTION: We examined the feasibility of WEB implantation as second-line treatment for wide-necked residual aneurysms after unsuccessful clipping. We also recorded the safety and efficacy in this small series of 6 patients. To determine safety, we measured the modified Rankin Scale score before and after the procedure, and at 2 later time points (mean follow-up, 5 months and 15 months). To determine efficacy, we obtained radiographic aneurysm occlusion outcomes (including WEB Occlusion Scale) at these 2 time points. Four middle cerebral artery and 2 anterior communicating artery complex aneurysms were treated with WEB implantation, showing feasibility in 6/6 cases (100%). Follow-up at 15 months showed no change from preprocedural modified Rankin Scale score and there were no other complications. There was adequate occlusion in 5/6 cases (83%).
CONCLUSIONS: WEB implantation provided a feasible option in this challenging retreatment scenario. This is a small series and prospective data are required to make outcome inferences for this population. Nonetheless, we observed no complications and high adequate occlusion rates.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm remnant; Endovascular treatment; Intrasaccular device; Recurrent aneurysm; Residual aneurysm; Surgical clipping; Woven Endobridge (WEB)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179191      PMCID: PMC7611019          DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  34 in total

1.  Safety results from the treatment of 109 cerebral aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge technique: preliminary results in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Aimee Lawson; Andy Molyneux; Robin Sellar; Saleh Lamin; Allan Thomas; Anil Gholkar; Tufail Patankar
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  An update on intrasaccular flow disruption for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Matthias Gawlitza; Sébastien Soize; Pierre-François Manceau; Laurent Pierot
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Intrasaccular Flow Disruption with WEB Device: Current Place and Results in Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Laurent Pierot; Adam S Arthur; David Fiorella; Laurent Spelle
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  MRA versus DSA for the follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated using endovascular techniques: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Syed Uzair Ahmed; J Mocco; Xiangnan Zhang; Michael Kelly; Amish Doshi; Kambiz Nael; Reade De Leacy
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Risk of Aneurysm Residual Regrowth, Recurrence, and de Novo Aneurysm Formation After Microsurgical Clip Occlusion Based on Follow-up with Catheter Angiography.

Authors:  Jan-Karl Burkhardt; Michelle H J Chua; Miriam Weiss; Angelique Sao-Mai S Do; Ethan A Winkler; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Secondary coiling after incomplete surgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms: a rescue strategy or a treatment option for complex cases? Institutional series and systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa; Federico Bianchi; Alba Scerrati; Alessio Albanese; Enrico Cotroneo; Alberto Delitala; Renato Gigli; Giuseppe La Rocca; Enrico Marchese; Alessandro Pedicelli; Alfredo Puca; Giovanni Sabatino; Alessando Olivi; Carmelo Lucio Sturiale
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Failed aneurysm surgery. Reoperation in 115 cases.

Authors:  C G Drake; A H Friedman; S J Peerless
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Therapeutic strategies for residual or recurrent intracranial aneurysms after microsurgical clipping.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Kim; Joonho Chung; Seung Kon Huh; Keun Young Park; Dong Joon Kim; Byung Moon Kim; Jae Whan Lee
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  WEB in Partially Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms: A Word of Caution.

Authors:  G Anil; A J P Goddard; S M Ross; K Deniz; T Patankar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series.

Authors:  Laurent Pierot; Jacques Moret; Xavier Barreau; Istvan Szikora; Denis Herbreteau; Francis Turjman; Markus Holtmannspötter; Anne-Christine Januel; Vincent Costalat; Jens Fiehler; Joachim Klisch; Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Werner Weber; Hubert Desal; Stéphane Velasco; Thomas Liebig; Luc Stockx; Joachim Berkefeld; Andrew Molyneux; James Byrne; Laurent Spelle
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.