Literature DB >> 30645118

Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization To Reproduce ab Initio Anisotropy.

Junmei Wang1, Piotr Cieplak2, Ray Luo3, Yong Duan4.   

Abstract

A set of atomic polarizability parameters for a new polarizable Gaussian model (pGM) has been developed with the goal to accurately reproduce the polarizability anisotropy, taking advantage of its ability to attenuate all short-range electrostatic interactions, by fitting the ab initio molecular polarizability tensors ( A pq) calculated at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level. For comparison, we also rederived the parameters for three Thole models in which the 1-2 (bonded), 1-3 (separated by two bonds), and 1-4 (separated by three bonds) interactions are fully included. The average percent errors (APEs) of molecular polarizability tensors for 4842 molecules or dimers are 2.98, 3.76, 3.28, and 3.82% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba models, respectively, with atom-type independent, universal screening factors (USF). The APEs are reduced further to 2.30, 2.69, 2.25, and 2.48% for the four corresponding polarizable models with atom-type dependent, variable screening factors (VSF). It is encouraging that the pGM with variable screening factors achieved APEs of 1.83 for 1155 amino acid analogs, dipeptides, and tetrapeptides, 1.39 for 28 nucleic acid bases, 0.708 for 1464 water clusters, and 1.99 for 85 dimers of water and biological building blocks. Compared to the new set of models, the APEs of the old Thole models that were fitted to isotropic molecular polarizabilities are 8.7% for set A (without the 1-2 and 1-3 interactions) and 6.3% for set D (with the 1-2 and 1-3 interactions) models, respectively. MPAD, a metric of molecular polarization anisotropy difference based on the diagonal terms of molecular polarizability tensors was defined and applied to assess the polarizable models in reproducing the ab initio molecular polarization anisotropy. The MPADs are 3.71, 4.70, 4.11, and 4.77% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba USF models, respectively. The APEs are reduced further to 2.85, 3.58, 2.90, and 3.15% for the four corresponding VSF models. Thus, the new pGM and Thole models notably improve molecular polarization anisotropy. Since pGM attenuates all short-range electrostatic interactions, its application is expected to improve stability in charge fitting, energy, and force calculations and the accuracy of multibody polarization.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30645118     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  8 in total

1.  Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Junxi Mu; Hao Liu; Jian Zhang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Wei Yang; Tai-Sung Lee; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Efficient formulation of polarizable Gaussian multipole electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Haixin Wei; Ruxi Qi; Junmei Wang; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Data-Driven Mapping of Gas-Phase Quantum Calculations to General Force Field Lennard-Jones Parameters.

Authors:  Sophie M Kantonen; Hari S Muddana; Michael Schauperl; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.

Authors:  Jacob M Litman; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Stress tensor and constant pressure simulation for polarizable Gaussian multipole model.

Authors:  Haixin Wei; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  PyRESP: A Program for Electrostatic Parameterizations of Additive and Induced Dipole Polarizable Force Fields.

Authors:  Shiji Zhao; Haixin Wei; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.578

8.  Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.

Authors:  Edward King; Ruxi Qi; Han Li; Ray Luo; Erick Aitchison
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.006

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.