Literature DB >> 32962378

A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.

Xibing He1, Viet H Man1, Wei Yang2, Tai-Sung Lee3, Junmei Wang1.   

Abstract

The General AMBER Force Field (GAFF) has been broadly used by researchers all over the world to perform in silico simulations and modelings on diverse scientific topics, especially in the field of computer-aided drug design whose primary task is to accurately predict the affinity and selectivity of receptor-ligand binding. The atomic partial charges in GAFF and the second generation of GAFF (GAFF2) were originally developed with the quantum mechanics derived restrained electrostatic potential charge, but in practice, users usually adopt an efficient charge method, Austin Model 1-bond charge corrections (AM1-BCC), based on which, without expensive ab initio calculations, the atomic charges could be efficiently and conveniently obtained with the ANTECHAMBER module implemented in the AMBER software package. In this work, we developed a new set of BCC parameters specifically for GAFF2 using 442 neutral organic solutes covering diverse functional groups in aqueous solution. Compared to the original BCC parameter set, the new parameter set significantly reduced the mean unsigned error (MUE) of hydration free energies from 1.03 kcal/mol to 0.37 kcal/mol. More excitingly, this new AM1-BCC model also showed excellent performance in the solvation free energy (SFE) calculation on diverse solutes in various organic solvents across a range of different dielectric constants. In this large-scale test with totally 895 neutral organic solvent-solute systems, the new parameter set led to accurate SFE predictions with the MUE and the root-mean-square-error of 0.51 kcal/mol and 0.65 kcal/mol, respectively. This newly developed charge model, ABCG2, paved a promising path for the next generation GAFF development.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32962378      PMCID: PMC7728379          DOI: 10.1063/5.0019056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  61 in total

1.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Elise Dumont; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design.

Authors:  Ercheng Wang; Huiyong Sun; Junmei Wang; Zhe Wang; Hui Liu; John Z H Zhang; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-08-19

4.  ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solution.

Authors:  Chuan Tian; Koushik Kasavajhala; Kellon A A Belfon; Lauren Raguette; He Huang; Angela N Migues; John Bickel; Yuzhang Wang; Jorge Pincay; Qin Wu; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Extension of the CHARMM General Force Field to sulfonyl-containing compounds and its utility in biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Xibing He; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  FreeSolv: a database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies, with input files.

Authors:  David L Mobley; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Wenbo Yu; Vincent D Ustach; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Delin Sun; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 9.  An Empirical Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator Model: Development History and Recent Applications.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Jing Huang; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Improving the Efficiency of Free Energy Calculations in the Amber Molecular Dynamics Package.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaus; Levi T Pierce; Ross C Walker; J Andrew McCammont
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  26 in total

1.  Integration of Experimental Data and Use of Automated Fitting Methods in Developing Protein Force Fields.

Authors:  Marcelo D Polêto; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2022-03-18

2.  Effects of All-Atom Molecular Mechanics Force Fields on Amyloid Peptide Assembly: The Case of PHF6 Peptide of Tau Protein.

Authors:  Viet Hoang Man; Xibing He; Jie Gao; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Preserving the Integrity of Empirical Force Fields.

Authors:  Asuka A Orr; Suliman Sharif; Junmei Wang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.162

4.  Methotrexate recognition by the human reduced folate carrier SLC19A1.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wright; Justin G Fedor; Han Zhang; Pyeonghwa Jeong; Yang Suo; Jiho Yoo; Jiyong Hong; Wonpil Im; Seok-Yong Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Binding thermodynamics and interaction patterns of human purine nucleoside phosphorylase-inhibitor complexes from extensive free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Mechanistic analysis of light-driven overcrowded alkene-based molecular motors by multiscale molecular simulations.

Authors:  Mudong Feng; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Variational Method for Networkwide Analysis of Relative Ligand Binding Free Energies with Loop Closure and Experimental Constraints.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Pathways and Mechanism of Caffeine Binding to Human Adenosine A2A Receptor.

Authors:  Hung N Do; Sana Akhter; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-27

Review 9.  Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules.

Authors:  Xibing He; Brandon Walker; Viet H Man; Pengyu Ren; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Generalizing the Discrete Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics Approach for Multisite Sampling of Many Ligands.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Xinqiang Ding; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.